Two studies examined students classified as having learning disabilities (LD) who had received course substitutions for the college foreign language (FL) requirement. In the first study, 42 students at one university were divided into groups and compared on measures of IQ, academic achievement, FL aptitude, college grade point average (GPA), and FL and English grades. Findings showed that most of the 42 students had been classified as LD in college after experiencing problems in FL courses. Comparisons based on students' performance on measures of FL aptitude, native language skill, and performance in FL courses showed few significant group differences. In the second study, the 42 students from the first study were compared with 86 students at another university who had also been classified as LD and received course substitutions for the college FL requirement. Comparisons on demographic information and measures of IQ, academic achievement, FL aptitude, college GPA, and FL GPA showed few significant differences between the two groups. Both studies suggest that students classified as LD at different universities exhibit similar demographic, cognitive, academic achievement, and FL aptitude profiles and that educators should not make the a priori assumption that students classified as LD require course substitutions for the FL requirement or experience problems with FL learning.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Aaron, P.G. (1997). The impending demise of the discrepancy formula . Review of Educational Research, 67, 461-502.
2.
Arries, R. (1994). An experimental Spanish course for learning disabled students. Hisprrnia, 77, 110-117.
3.
Barr, V. (1993). Foreign language requirement and students with learning disabilities (Report No. EDO-FL-93-04). Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.
4.
Carroll, J., & Sapon, S. (1959). Modern Language Aptitude Test (MLAT): Manual. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corp.
5.
Fisher, E. (1986). Learning disability specialist looks at foreign language instruction. HilltopSpectrum, 4, 1-3.
6.
Frankenberger, W., & Fronzaglio, K. (1991). A review of states' criteria and procedures for identifying children with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 24, 495-500.
7.
Freed, B. (1987). Exemptions from the foreign language requirement: A review of recent literature, problems, and policy. ADFL Bulletin, 18, 13-17.
8.
Ganschow, L., Myer, B., & Roeger, K. (1989). Foreign language polides and procedures for students with specific learning disabilities. Learning DisabilitiesFocus, 5, 50-58.
9.
Ganschow, L., & Sparks, R. (1986). Learning disabilities and foreign language difficulties: Deficit in listening skills?Journal of Reading, Writing, and Learning Disabilities Internutional, 2, 306-319.
10.
Ganschow, L., & Sparks, R. (1987). The foreign language requirement. Learning DisabilitiesFocus, 2, 116-123.
11.
Ganschow, L., & Sparks, R. (1995). Effects of direct instruction in Spanish phonology on the native language skills and foreign language aptitude of at-risk foreign language learners. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 28, 107-120.
12.
Ganschow, L., & Sparks, R. (1996). Foreign language anxiety among high school women . Modern Language Journal, 80, 199-212.
13.
Ganschow, L., Sparks, R., Anderson, R., Javorsky, J., Skinner, S., & Patton, J. (1994). Differences in anxiety and language performance among high- and low-anxious college foreign language learners. Modern Langunge Journal, 78, 41-55.
14.
Ganschow, L., Sparks, R., & Javorsky, J. (1998). Foreign language learning problems: An historical perspective. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 31, 248-258.
15.
Ganschow, L., Sparks, R., Javorsky, J., Pohlman, J., & Bishop-Marbury, A. (1991). Identifying native language difficulties among foreign language learners in college: A "foreign" language learning disability?Journal of Learning Disabilities, 24, 530-541.
16.
Guckenberger, et al. v. Trustees of Boston University et al., 974F. Supp. 106 (D. Mass. 1996).
17.
Guckenberger, et al. v. Trustees of Boston University et aL, 974F. Supp. 106 (D. Mass. 1997).
18.
Guckenberger, et al. v. Trustees of Boston University et aL, 974F. Supp. 106 (D. Mass. 1998).
19.
Humes-Bartlo, M. (1989). Variation in children's ability to learn second languages. In K. Hyltenstam & L. Obler (Eds.), Bilingualism across the life span (pp. 41-54). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
20.
Jastak, S., & Wilkinson, G. (1984). Wide range achievement test-revised. Wilmington, DE: Jastak.
21.
Lefebvre, R. (1984). A psychological consultation program for learning disabled adults. Journal of College Student Personnel, 25, 361-362.
22.
Mabbott, A. (1994). Students labeled learning disabled and the foreign language requirement: Background and suggestions for teachers. In C. Klee (Ed.), The individual learner in multisertion courses (pp. 325-353). Boston: Heinle & Heinle.
23.
Moore, F. (1995). Section 504 and the Americans with Disabilities Act: Accommodating the learning disabled student in the foreign language curriculum . ADFL Bulletin, 260, 59-62-
24.
Olshtain, E., Shohamy, E., Kemp, J., & Chatow, R. (1990). Factors predicting success in EFL among culturally different learners. Language Learning, 40, 23-44.
25.
Sattler, J. (1988). Assessment of children (3rd ed.). San Diego, CA: Author.
26.
Service, E. (1992). Phonology, working memory, and foreign language learning. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 45A, 21-50.
27.
Skehan, P. (1986). The role of foreign language aptitude in a model of school learning. Langunge Testing, 3,188-221.
28.
Sparks, R. (1995). Examining the linguistic coding differences hypothesis to explain individual differences in foreign language learning. Annals of Dyslexia, 45, 187-214.
29.
Sparks, R., Artzer, M., Javorsky, J., Patton, J., Ganschow, L., Miller, K., & Hordubay, D. (1998). Students classified with learning disabled (LD) and non-learning disabled students: Two comparison studies of native language skill, foreign language aptitude, and foreign language proficiency. Foreign Language Annals, 31, 535-551.
30.
Sparks, R., Artzer, M., Patton, J., Ganschow, L., Miller, K., Hordubay, D., & Walsh, G. (1998). Benefits of multisensory language instruction in Spanish for at-risk learners: A comparison study. Annals of Dyslexia, 48, 239-270.
31.
Sparks, R., & Ganschow, L. (1991). Foreign language learning difficulties: Affective or native language aptitude differences?Modern language Journal , 75, 3-16.
32.
Sparks, R., & Ganschow, L. (1993a). Identifying and instructing at-risk foreign language learners in college. In D. Benseler (Ed.), The dynamics of language program direction (pp. 173-199). Boston: Heinle & Heinle.
33.
Sparks, R., & Ganschow, L. (1993b). Searching for the cognitive locus of foreign language learning problems: Linking first and second language learning. Modern Language Journal, 77, 289-302.
34.
Sparks, R., & Ganschow, L. (1993c). The effects of a multisensory structured language approach on the native language and foreign language aptitude skills of at-risk learners: A follow-up and replication study. Annals of Dyslexia , 43, 194-216.
35.
Sparks, R., & Ganschow, L. (1995a). A strong inference approach to causal factors in foreign language learning: A response to Madntyre. Modern Language Journal. 79, 235-244.
36.
Sparks, R., & Ganschow, L. (1995b). Parent perceptions in the screening for performance in foreign language courses. Foreign Language Annals, 28, 37-391.
37.
Sparks, R., & Ganschow, L. (1996). Teachers' perceptions of students' foreign language academic skills and affective characteristics. Journal of Educational Research, 89, 172-185.
38.
Sparks, R., & Ganschow, L. (1997). Aptitude for learning a foreign language: A review . In M. O'Connell & M. Gardenghi (Eds.), Prüfen, testen, bewerten in modernen fremdsprachenunterricht [Measurement, testing, and validation in modem foreign language education] (pp. 49-61). Frankfurt, Germany: Europäischer Verlag der Wissenschaften.
39.
Sparks, R., Ganschow, L., Artzer, M., & Patton, J. (1997). Foreign language proficiency of at-risk and not-at-risk learners over two years of foreign language instruction. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 30, 92-98.
40.
Sparks, R., Ganschow, L., Artzer, M., Siebenhar, D., & Plageman, M. (1997). Language anxiety and proficiency in a foreign language. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 85, 559-562.
41.
Sparks, R., Ganschow, L., Artzer, M., Siebenhar, D., & Plageman, M. (1998). Differences in native language skills, foreign language aptitude, and foreign language grades among high, average, and low proficiency learners: Two studies. Language Testing, 15, 181-216.
42.
Sparks, R., Ganschow, L., Fluharty, K., & Little, S. (1996). An exploratory study on the effects of Latin on the native language skills and foreign language aptitude of students with and without learning disabilities. Classical Journal, 91, 165-184.
43.
Sparks, R., Ganschow, L., & Javorsky, J. (1995). I know one when I see one (or I know one because I am one): A response to Mabbott. Foreign Language Annals , 28, 479-487.
44.
Sparks, R., Ganschow, L., Javorsky, J., Pohlman, J., & Patton, J. (1992a). Identifying native language deficits in high-and low-risk foreign language learners in high school. Foreign Language Annals, 25, 403-418.
45.
Sparks, R., Ganschow, L., Javorsky, J., Pohlman, J., & Patton, J. (1992b). Test comparisons among students identified as high-risk, low-risk, and learning disabled in high school foreign language courses. Modern Language Journal, 76, 142-159.
46.
Sparks, R., Ganschow, L., & Patton, J. (1995). Prediction of performance in first-year foreign language courses: Connections between native language and foreign language learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87, 638-655.
47.
Sparks, R., Ganschow, L., Patton, J., Artzer, M., Siebenhar, D., & Plageman, M. (1997). Prediction of proficiency in a foreign language . Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 549-561.
48.
Sparks, R., Ganschow, L., & Pohlman, J. (1989). Linguistic coding deficits in foreign language learners. Annals of Dyslexia, 39, 179-195.
49.
Sparks, R., Ganschow, L., Pohlman, J., Artzer, M., & Skinner, S., (1992). The effects of a multisensory, structured language approach on the native and foreign language skills of high-risk foreign language learners. Annals of Dyslexia, 42, 25-53.
50.
Sparks, R., Javorsky, J., & Ganschow, L. (1995). Satiating the appetite of the sociologic sponge: A rejoinder to Mabbott. Foreign Language Annals, 28, 495-498.
51.
Sparks, R., Philips, L., & Ganschow, L. (1996). Students classified with learning disabled and the college foreign language requirement. In J. Liskin-Gasparro (Ed.), Patterns and policies: The changing demo-graphics of foreign language instruction (pp. 123-159). Boston: Heinle & Heinle.
52.
Sparks, R., Philips, L., Ganschow, L., & Javorsky, J. (in press-a). Students classified as learning disabled and the college foreign language requirement: A quantitative analysis. Journal of Learning Disabilities.
53.
Sparks, R., Philips, L., Ganschow, L., & Javorsky, J. (in press-b). Comparison of students classified as learning disabled who petitioned for or fulfilled the college foreign language requirement. Journal of Learning Disabilities.
54.
Spolsky, B. (1989). Conditions for second language learning. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
55.
Wechsler, D. (1981a). Wechsler adult intelligence scale-revised (WAIS-R) . San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corp.
56.
Wechsler, D. (1981b). Wechsler intelligence scale for children-revised (WISC-R). San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corp.
57.
Woodcock, R. (1987). Woodcock reading mastery test-Revised. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service .
58.
Woodcock, R., & Johnson, M.B. (1978). Woodcock-Johnson psycho-educational battery (WJPB). Allen Park, TX: DLM Teaching Resources.
59.
Woodcock, R., & Johnson, M.B. (1989). Woodcock-Johnson Revised Tests of Achievement (WJ-R). Chicago, IL: Riverside.
