It has been observed for decades that some students have a particularly difficult time learning another language. Colleges and universities have an obligation to offer special language programs designed to help these students succeed in their attempts to learn another language. However, for those few students who cannot learn another language even with special instruction, allowing them to meet the foreign language requirement though the substitution of related courses is appropriate and does not constitute a fundamental alteration of the goals of a liberal education.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq.
2.
Arries, J. (1994). An experimental Spanish course for learning disabled students. Hispania, 77,110-117.
3.
Baron, N.S. (1982). Rationales and rationalizations in foreign language requirements. Liberal Education, 68, 181-191.
4.
Block, L. (1996, August). Effective language teaching for students with learning disabilities. Paper presented at the Consortium on Foreign Language and Learning Disability, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.
5.
Brod, R., & Huber, B.J. (1996). The MLA survey of foreign language entrance and degree requirements 1994-95. ADFL Bulletin, 28, 35-43.
6.
Carroll, J.B. (1981). Twenty-five years of research on foreign language aptitude. In K. C. Diller (Ed.), Individual differences and universals in language learning aptitude (pp. 87-136.). Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press .
7.
Cummins, J. (1984). Bilingualism and special education: Issues in assessment and pedagogy. San Diego: College-Hill.
8.
Demuth, K., & Smith, N. (1987). The foreign language requirement An alternative program. Foreign Language Annals, 20, 67-77.
9.
Dinklage, K. (1971). Inability to learn a foreign language. In G. Blaine & C. McArthur (Eds.), Emotional problems of the student (pp. 185-208). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
10.
Downey, D., & Hill, B. (1994, August). The foreign language modification program at the University of Colorado at Boulder. Paper presented at the meeting of the Rocky Mountain Language Association Convention , Colorado Springs, CO.
11.
Dunkel, H.B. (1947). The effect of personality on language achievement . Journal of Educational Psychology, 38, 277-282.
12.
Gajar, A. (1987). Foreign language learning disabilities: The identification of predictive and diagnostic variables. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 20, 327-330.
13.
Ganschow, L., & Sparks, R. (1991). A screening instrument for the identification of foreign language problems. Foreign Language Annals, 24, 383-398.
14.
Ganschow, L., & Sparks, R. (1993). "Foreign" language learning disabilities: Issues, research and teaching implications. In S. Vogel & P. Adelman (Eds.), Success for college students with learning disabilities (pp. 283-322). New York: Springer Verlag.
15.
Ganschow, L., & Sparks, R. (1995). Effects of direct instruction in phonology on the native language skills and foreign language aptitude of at-risk foreign language learners. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 28, 107-120.
16.
Goodman, J., Freed, B., & McManus, W. (1990). Determining exemptions from foreign language requirements: Use of the Modern Language Aptitude Test. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 15, 131-141.
17.
Guckenberger et al. v. Boston University, et al. 974 F. Supp. 106 (D. Mass. 1997).
18.
Guckenberger et al. v. Boston University et al. (1998, June 1). (Text of judge's decision regarding foreign language substitutions.) Academe Today, the Internet Site of the Chronicle of Higher Education.
19.
Hill, B., Downey, D.M., Sheppard, M., & Williamson, V. (1995). Accommodating the needs of students with severe language learning disabilities in modified foreign language courses. In G. Crouse (Ed.), Report of central states conference on the teaching of foreign languages: Broadening the frontiers of fvreign lareguage education. Lincolnwood, IL: National Textbook
20.
Ho, D.Y.F. (1987). Prediction of foreign language skills: A canonical and part canonical correlation study. Contemporary Educational Psychotogy, 12, 119-130.
21.
Hughes, C., & Smith, J. (1990). Cognitive and academic performance of college students with learning disabilities: A synthesis of the literature. Learning Disability Quarterly, 13, 66-79.
22.
Javorsky, J., Sparks, R., & Ganschow, L. (1992). Perceptions of college students with and without specific learning disabilities about foreign language courses. Larrning Disabilities Research & Practice, 7, 31-44.
23.
Kenneweg, S. (1988). Meeting special learning needs in the Spanish curriculum of a college preparatory school. In B. Snyder (Ed.), Get ready, get set, go! Action in the foreign language classroom (pp- 16-18). Columbus: Ohio Foreign Language Association.
24.
Leons, E., Herbert, H., & Conley, C. (1997, October). The foreign language project at Landmark College. Paper presented at the Sharing Our Gifts Conference, Putney, VT.
Lewin, T. (1998, May 31) Students lose on last issue in bias suit . The New York Times, p. A12.
27.
Mabbott, A.S. (1994). Students labeled learning disabled and the foreign language requirement: Background and suggestions for teachers. In Carol A. Klee (Ed.), Faces in a crowd: The individual learner in multisection courses (pp- 325-353). Boston: Heinle and Heinle.
28.
McCusker, C.E. (1995). The Americans with Disabilities Act: Its potential for expanding the scope of reasonable academic accommodations. TheJournal of College and University Law, 21, 619-641.
29.
McGuire, J., & Shaw, S. (1998). Policies and procedures survey. Unpublished manuscript , the University of Connecticut, Storrs.
30.
Milani, A. (1996). Disabled students in higher education: Administrative and judicial enforcement of disability law. TheJournal of College and University Law, 22, 989-1043.
31.
Moore, F.X., III (1995). Section 504 and the Americans with Disabilities Act: Accommodating the learning disabled student in the foreign language curriculum . ADFL Bulletin, 26(2), 59-62.
32.
Myer, B., & Ganschow, L. (1989). Profiles of frustration: Second language learners with specific learning disabilities. In J. Lalande (Ed.), Shaping the future of foreign language education: FLES, articulation, and proficiency (pp. 32-53). Lincolnwood, IL: National Textbook.
33.
Myer, B.J., Ganschow, L., Sparks, R., & Kenneweg, S. (1989). Cracking the code: Helping students with specific learning disabilities. In D. McAlpine (Ed.), Defining the essentials for the foreign language classroom (pp. 112-120). Lincolnwood, IL: National Textbook
34.
Rehabilitation Act of 1973, Section 504, 29 U.S.C. § 794.
35.
Rudolph, F. (1968). The American college and university: A history . New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
36.
Rudolph, F. (1977). Curriculum: A history of the American undergraduate course of study. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
37.
Rudy, W. (1960). The evolving liberal arts curriculum: A historical review of basic themes. New York: Teachers College, Columbia University.
38.
Schaefer, W.D. (1990). Education without compromise: From chaos to coherence in higher education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
39.
Schneider, E. (1995, Fall). A multisensory, direct approach to teaching German as a foreign language to at-risk college students. NEBODSNewsletter, 1, 14-15.
40.
Schneider, E. (1996). Teaching foreign languages to at-risk learners . (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 402 788)
41.
Sparks, R., & Ganschow, L. (1991). Foreign language learning difficulties: Affective or native language aptitude differences?Modern Language Journal , 75, 3-16.
42.
Sparks, R., & Ganschow, L. (1993a). The effects of a multisensory structured language approach on the native and foreign language aptitude of at-risk foreign language learners: A follow-up and replication study. Annals of Dyslexia , 43, 194-216.
43.
Sparks, R., & Ganschow, L. (1993b). The impact of native language learning problems on foreign language learning: Case study illustrations of the linguistic coding deficit hypothesis. The Modern Language Journal, 77, 58-74.
44.
Sparks, R., & Ganschow, L. (1993c). Searching for the cognitive locus of foreign language learning difficulties: Linking first and second language learning . The Modern Language Journal, 77, 289-302.
45.
Sparks, R. Ganschow, L., Artzer, M., & Patton, J. (1997). Foreign language proficiency of at-risk and not-at-risk learners over 2 years of foreign language instruction: A follow-up study. journal of Learning Disabilities, 30, 92-98.
46.
Sparks, R., Ganschow, L., Fluharty, K., & Little, S. (1995). An exploratory study on the effects of Latin on the native language skills and foreign language aptitude of students with and without learning disabilities. The Classical Journal, 91, 165-184.
47.
Sparks, R., Ganschow, L., & Javorsky, J. (1992). Diagnosing and accommodating the foreign language learning difficulties of college students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Resorch & Practice, 7, 150-160.
48.
Sparks, R., Ganschow, L., Kenneweg, S., & Miller, K. (1991). UsingOrton- Gillingham methodology to teach a foreign language to learning disabled dyslexic students: Explicit teaching of phonology in a second language. Annals of Dyslexia, 41, 96-118.
49.
Sparks, R., Ganschow, L., & Patton, J. (1995). Prediction of performance in first-year foreign language courses: Connections between native and foreign language learning . Journal of Educational Psychology, 87, 638-655.
50.
Sparks, R., Ganschow, L., Patton, J., Artzer, M., Seibenhar, D., & Plageman, M. (1997). Prediction of foreign language proficiency. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 549-561.
51.
Sparks, R., Ganschow, L., & Pohlman, J. (1989). Linguistic coding deficits in foreign language learners. Annals of Dyslexia, 39, 179-195.
52.
Sparks, R., Ganschow, L., Pohlman, J., Skinner, S., & Artzer, M. (1992). The effects of multisensory structured language instruction on native language and foreign language aptitude skills of at-risk high school foreign language learners. Annals of Dyslexia , 42, 25-53.
53.
Sparks, R., Philips, L., & Ganschow, L. (1996). Students classified as learning disabled and the college foreign language requirement: A case study of one university. In J. Liskin-Gasparro (Ed.), Patterns and policies: The changing demo-graphics of foreign language instruction (pp. 123-159). Boston: Heinle and Heinle.
54.
Sudermann, D., & Cisar, M. (1992). Foreign language across the curriculum: A critical appraisal. The Modern Language Journal, 76, 295-308.
55.
Van Doren, M. (1943). Liberal education. New York : Henry Holt.
56.
Weingartner, R.H. (1992). Undergraduate education. New York: Macmillan.
57.
Winter, D.G., McClelland, D.C., & Stewart, A.J. (1981). A new case for the liberal arts. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
