Verbal retelling abilities for social studies lectures were examined and compared in 20 adolescent boys, ages 12-5 to 14-7, with language-learning disabilities (LLD) and 29 with normal language abilities (NL). Participants viewed one videotaped social studies lecture with a comparison expository discourse structure and one with a causation discourse structure. Following each lecture presentation, participants verbally retold the lecture. Results of several repeated-measures analyses of variance indicated that the group with LLD produced a significantly smaller number of T-units, subordinate clauses, subordinate clauses per T-unit, T-units per second, lecture components per second, and percentage of lecture components in their retellings, compared with the group with NL, regardless of lecture type. Both groups produced a significantly greater number of T-units and subordinate clauses for the comparison lecture. By contrast, both groups recalled a significantly greater number of lecture components per T-unit and per second for the causation lecture. Results indicated that the comparison discourse structure facilitated more substantive and elaborate retellings, whereas the causation discourse structure facilitated more efficient, concise retellings in both groups. Research and instructional implications are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bacon, E.H., & Carpenter, D. (1989). Learning disabled and nondisabled college students' use of structure in recall of stories and text. Learning Disability Quarterly, 12, 108-118.
2.
Bashir, A.S., & Scavuzzo, A. (1992). Children with language disorders: Natural history and academic success. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 25, 53-65.
3.
Bromage, B.K., & Mayer, R.E. (1986). Quantitative and qualitative effects of repetition on learning from technical text. Journal of Educational Psychology , 78, 271-278.
4.
Bryant, D., Fleischner, J., MacGinitie, W., Shepherd, M.J., & Williams, J. (1983). Research Institute for the Study of Learning Disabilities final report (1980-1983). New York: Teacher's College, Columbia University.
5.
Buttrill, J., Niizawa, J., Biemer, C., Takahashi, C., & Hearn, S. (1989). Serving the language learning disabled adolescent: A strategies-based model. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 16, 2-15.
6.
Carroll, J.B., Davis, P., & Richman, H. (1971). The American Heritage word frequency book. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.
7.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
8.
Copmann, K.S.P., & Griffith, P.L. (1994). Event and story structure recall bv children with specific learning disabilities, language impairments, and normally achieving children. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 23, 231-248.
9.
Donahue, M.L., & Pidek, C.M. (1993). Listening comprehension and paraphrasing in content-area classrooms. Journal of Childhood Communication Disorders, 15, 35-42.
10.
Ehren, B.J. (1994). New directions for meeting the academic needs of adolescents with language learning disabilities? In G. P. Wallach & K. G. Butler (Eds.), Language learning disabilities in school-age children and adolescents (pp. 393-417). New York: Merrill.
11.
Einstein, G.O., Morris, J., & Smith, S. (1985). Note taking, individual differences, and memory for lecture information. Journal of Educational Psychology , 77, 522-532.
12.
Fang, I.E. (1966). The easy listening formula. Journal of Broadcasting, 11, 63-68.
13.
Goss, B. (1982, April). Listening to language: An information processing perspective. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Southern Speech Communication Association, Hot Springs, AR.
14.
Graybeal, C.M. (1981). Memory for stories in language-impaired children . Applied Psycholinguistics, 2, 269-283.
15.
Hunt, K.W. (1965). Grammatical structure written at three grade levels . Champaign, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
16.
Johnston, J.R. (1982). Narratives: A new look at communication problems in older language-disordered children. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 13, 144-155.
17.
Kiewra, K.A., Mayer, R.E., Christensen, M., Kim, S., & Risch, N. (1991). Effects of repetition on recall and note-taking strategies for learning from lectures. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 120-123.
18.
King, A. (1989). Effects of self-questioning training on college students' comprehension of lectures. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 14, 366-381.
19.
Liles, B.Z. (1985). Cohesion in the narratives of normal and language-disordered children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 28, 122-133.
20.
Merritt, D.D., & Liles, B.Z. (1987). Story grammar ability in children with and without language disorder: Story generation, story retelling, and story comprehension . Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 30, 539-552.
21.
Meyer, B.J.F., & Freedle, R.O. (1984). Effects of discourse type on recall. American Educational Research Journal, 21, 121-143.
22.
Moran, M. (1980). An investigation of the demands on oral language skills of learning disabled students in secondary classrooms (Research Report No.1). Lawrence: University of Kansas Institute for Research in Learning Disabilities.
23.
Nelson, N.W. (1993). Language disorders in context: Infancy through adolescence. New York: Merrill.
24.
Richgels, D.J., McGee, L.M., Lomax, R.G., & Sheard, C. (1987). Awareness of four text structures: Effects on recall of expository text. Reading Research Quarterly, 22, 177-196.
25.
Rickards, J.P., & McCormick, C.B. (1988). Effect of interspersed conceptual pre-questions on note-taking in listening comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 30, 592-594.
26.
Ruhl, K.L., Hughes, C.A., & Gajar, A.H. (1990). Efficacy of the pause procedure for enhancing learning disabled and nondisabled college students' long- and short-term recall of facts presented through lecture. Learning Disability Quarterly , 13, 55-64.
27.
Schumaker, J., Sheldon-Wildgen, J., & Sherman, J. (1980). An observational study of the academic and social behaviors of learning disabled adolescents in the regular classroom (Research Report No. 22). Lawrence: University of Kansas Institute for Research in Learning Disabilities.
28.
Scott, C.M. (1994). A discourse continuum for school-age students: Impact of modality and genre. In G. P. Wallach & K.G. Butler (Eds.), Language learning disabilities in school-age children and adolescents (pp. 219-252). New York: Merrill.
29.
Spires, H.A. (1993). Learning from a lecture: Effects of comprehension monitoring. Reading Research and Instruction, 32, 19-30.
30.
Tabachnick, B.G., & Fidell, L.S. (1989). Using multivariate statistics (2nd ed.). New York: Harper & Row.
31.
Ward-Lonergan, J.M., Liles, B.Z., & Anderson, A.M. (1998). Listening comprehension and recall abilities in adolescents with language-learning disabilities and without disabilities for social studies lectures. jounwl of Communication Disordtrs, 1,1-32.
32.
Wechsler, D. (1974). Wechger intelligence scale for children-Rerised . San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corp.
33.
Weismer, S.E. (1985). Constructive comprehension abilities exhibited by language-disordered children- Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 28, 175-184.
34.
Wiig, E., & Semel, E. (1984). Language assessment and intervention for the learning disobled (2nd ed.). Columbus, OH: Merrill.
35.
Wong, B.Y.L. (1980). Activating the inactive learner: Use of questions/prompts to enhance comprehension and retention of implied information in learning disabled children. Learning Disability Quarterly, 3, 29-37.
Zigmond, N., Kerr, M., & Schaeffer, A. (1988). Behavior patterns of learning disabled and non-learning disabled adolescents in high school academic dasses. Remedial and Special Education, 9, 6-11.
