Reading problems are among the most prevalent concerns for those who teach students with learning disabilities. In the present research, 39 students with severe reading problems were taught word recognition and comprehension skills using the failure free Reading Program. The intervention is based on principles identified in research on successful reading programs. Key steps in the program included (a) previewing the story, (b) listening to the story being read, (c) presenting content from the story, (d) reading the story, and (e) reviewing the story. Improved performance in letter-word identification, word attack, comprehension, and dictation was evident after intensive intervention. Discrepancies between intellectual ability and reading achievement decreased in more than half of the students. The failure free Reading Program seems to hold promise for improving reading in students with learning disabilities.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Center, Y., Wheldall, K., Freeman, L., Outhred, L., & McNaught, M. (1995). An evaluation of Reading Recovery, Reading Research Quarterly, 30, 240–263.
2.
Clay, M. M. (1985). The early detection of reading difficulties (3rd ed.). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
3.
Frankenberger, W., & Fronzaglio, J. (1991). A review of states' criteria and procedures for identifying children with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 24, 495–500.
4.
Freeman, T. J., & McLaughlin, T. F. (1984). Effects of a taped-words treatment procedure on learning disabled students' sight-word oral reading. Learning Disability Quarterly, 7, 49–54.
5.
Hiebert, E. H. (1994). Reading Recovery in the United States: What difference does it make to an age cohort?Educational Researcher, 23(9), 15–25.
6.
Kirk, S. A., & Elkins, J. (1975). Characteristics of children enrolled in Child Service Demonstration Centers. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 8, 630–637.
7.
Kuder, S. (1990). Effectiveness of the DISTAR reading program for children with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 23, 69–71.
8.
Lerner, J. (1993). Learning disabilities: Theories, diagnosis, and teaching strategies.Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
9.
Lockavitch, J. (1994). failure free Reading Program.Concord, NC: JFL Enterprises.
10.
Lockavitch, J. (1995). Don't close the book on your not-yet reader.Concord, NC: JFL Enterprises.
11.
Lovitt, T. C., & DeMeir, D. M (1984). An evaluation of the Slingerland method with LD youngsters. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 17, 267–272.
12.
Lyon, R. (1985). Education validation studies of learning disabilities subtypes. In B. Rourke (Ed.), Learning disabilities in children: Advances in subtype analysis.New York: Guilford Press.
13.
O'Connor, R. E., Jenkins, J. R., Cole, K. N., & Mills, P. E. (1993). Two approaches to reading instruction with children with disabilities: Does program make a difference? Exceptional Children, 59, 312–323.
14.
O'Shea, L. J., & Valcante, G. (1986). A comparison over time of relative discrepancy scores of low achievers. Exceptional Children, 53, 253–259.
15.
Perkins, V. L. (1988). Feedback effects on oral reading errors of children with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 21, 244–248.
16.
Polloway, E. A., Epstein, M. H., Polloway, C. H., Patton, J. R., & Ball, D. W.Corrective reading program: An analysis of effectiveness with learning disabled and mentally retarded students. Remedial and Special Education, 1986, 7(4), 41–47.
17.
Rose, T. L. (1986). Effects of illustrations on reading comprehension of learning disabled students. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 19, 542–544.
18.
Rose, T. L., & Beattie, J. R. (1986). Relative effects of teacher-directed and taped previewing on oral reading. Learning Disability Quarterly, 9, 193–199.
19.
Rose, T. L., McEntire, E., & Dowdy, C. (1982). Effects of two error-correction procedures on oral reading. Learning Disability Quarterly, 7, 100–105.
20.
Rose, T. L., & Sherry, L. (1984). Relative effects of two previewing procedures on LD adolescents' oral reading performance. Learning Disability Quarterly, 7, 39–44.
21.
Rosenberg, M. S. (1986). Error-correction during oral reading: A comparison of three techniques. Learning Disability Quarterly, 9, 182–192.
22.
Sachs, A. (1983). The effects of three prereading activities on learning disabled students' reading comprehension. Learning Disability Quarterly, 6, 248–251.
23.
Sachs, A.The effects of previewing activities on oral reading miscues. Remedial and Special Education, 1984, 5(3), 45–49.
24.
Salend, S. J., & Nowak, M. R. (1988). Effects of peer-previewing on LD students' oral reading skills. Learning Disability Quarterly, 10, 47–53.
25.
Sleeter, C. (1986). Learning disabilities: The social construction of a special education category. Exceptional Children, 53, 46–54.
26.
Smith, N. B. (1965). American reading instruction.Newark, DE: International Reading Association. (Original work published 1934)
27.
Thorpe, H. W., Chiang, B., & Darch, C. B. (1981). Individual and group feedback systems for improving oral reading accuracy in learning disabled and regular class children. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 14, 332–334.
28.
Tindal, J., Algozzine, B., & Ysseldyke, J. E. (1996). Effective strategies for improving reading performance. Manuscript in preparation.
29.
van Bon, W., Boksebeld, L., Font Freide, T., & van den Hurk, A. (1991). A comparison of three methods of reading-while-listening. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 24, 471–483.
30.
Wasik, B. A., & Slavin, R. E. (1983). Preventing early reading failure with one-to-one tutoring: A review of five programs. Reading Research Quarterly, 28, 179–200.
31.
Weinstein, G., & Cooke, N. L. (1992). The effects of two repeated reading interventions on generalization of fluency. Learning Disability Quarterly, 15, 21–28.
32.
Wood, K. D., & Algozzine, B. (1995). Teaching reading to high-risk learners: A unified perspective.Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
33.
Ysseldyke, J. E., & Algozzine, B. (1995). Special education: A practical approach for teachers (3rd ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
