Follow-up studies examining the outcomes for children and youth with learning disabilities who attended special education have appeared in the literature for decades. As American society becomes more technologically advanced and competitive, postsecondary school opportunities and subsequent employment choices that are meaningful and provide a livable wage teeter out of the reach of young people with learning disabilities. Follow-up study investigators seek to understand how to better prepare youth to meet these challenges by studying their long-term outcomes. The authors review data from 13 frequently referenced follow-up studies regarding postschool outcomes, postsecondary education, and employment, with attention to gender differences, for youth with learning disabilities who were served by and graduated from special education programs nationwide. They take a critical look at contradictions in the findings and discuss five methodological issues that seem to influence the conduct and interpretation of follow-up studies: aggregating data across disability categories; combining data on graduates who have been out of school for unequal periods of time; ignoring the issues of missing data, participant attrition, and incomplete data sets; combining data from different informants; and using nonequivalent databases to make comparisons to a population with no disabilities. The authors provide recommendations for conducting follow-up research on the long-term quality of life of children and youth with disabilities and their families.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Affleck, J. Q., Edgar, E., Levine, P., & Kortering, L. (1990). Postschool status of students classified as mildly mentally retarded, learning disabled, nonhandicapped: Does it get better with time? Education and Training in Mental Retardation, 25, 315–324.
2.
Babbie, E. R. (1973). Survey research methods.Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
3.
Bakeman, R., & Gottman, J. M. (1986). Observing interaction: An introduction to sequential analysis.New York: Cambridge University Press.
4.
Baller, W. R. (1936). A study of the present social status of a group of adults who when they were in elementary schools were classified as mentally deficient. Genetic Psychology Monographs, 18, 165–244.
5.
Baller, W. R., Charles, D. C., & Miller, E. L. (1967). Mid-life attainment of the mentally retarded: A longitudinal study. Genetic Psychology Monographs, 75, 235–239.
6.
Berliner, D. C. (1992, February). Educational reform in an era of disinformation. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education, San Antonio.
7.
Blackorby, J. (1991). Disability, special education, and social class: Their relationship to postschool status. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Washington, Seattle.
8.
Blackorby, J., Edgar, E., & Kortering, L. (1991). A third of our youth? A look at the problem of high school dropout among students with mild handicaps. The Journal of Special Education, 25, 102–113.
9.
Blackorby, J., & Wagner, M. (1996). Longitudinal postschool outcomes of youth with disabilities: Findings from the National Longitudinal Transition Study. Exceptional Children, 62, 399–413.
10.
Boehne, G. M.Regarding special classes for sub-normal children. Journal of Psycho-Asthenics, 1912, 17(1), 20–28.
11.
Boorstin, D. J. (1974). The Americans: The democratic experience.New York: Vintage Books.
12.
Bronner, A. F. (1933). Follow-up studies of mental defectives. Proceedings and Addresses of the American Association for the Study of the Feebleminded, 38, 258–264.
13.
Bruck, M. (1985). The adult functioning of children with specific learning disabilities: A follow-up study. Advances in Applied Developmental Psychology, 1, 91–129. New Jersey: Ablex.
14.
Bruininks, R. H., Wolman, C., & Thurlow, M. L.Considerations in designing survey studies and follow-up systems for special education service programs. Remedial and Special Education, 1990, 11(2), 7–17, 46.
15.
Bullis, M., Bull, B., & Johnson, B. (1994). Young adults who are hearing and deaf in a transition study: Did they and their parents supply similar data? Exceptional Children, 60, 323–333.
16.
Children's Defense Fund. (1987, January). Adolescent pregnancy: An anatomy of a social problem in search of comprehensive solutions. Washington DC: Children's Defense Fund Adolescent Pregnancy Prevention Clearinghouse.
17.
Coyle-Williams, M.Improving the self-sufficiency of teen parents. TASPP Brief, 1989, 1(6), 14.
18.
Davenport, C. B.Feeble inhibitionedness. Journal of Psycho-Asthenics, 1911, 18(3), 147–149.
19.
Dillman, D. A. (1978). Mail and telephone surveys.New York: Wiley-Interscience.
20.
Dinger, J. (1961). Postschool adjustment of former educable retarded pupils. Exceptional Children, 27, 353–360.
21.
Edgar, E.Employment as an outcome for mildly handicapped students: Current status and future directions. Focus on Exceptional Children, 1988, 21(1), 18.
22.
Edgar, E., & Levine, P. (1988). A longitudinal follow-along study of graduates of special education. Unpublished manuscript, University of Washington, Seattle.
23.
Fafard, M. B., & Haugbrich, P. A. (1981). Vocational and social adjustment of learning disabled young adults: A follow-up survey. Learning Disability Quarterly, 4, 122–130.
24.
Fairweather, J. S., & Shaver, D. (1991). Making transition to postsecondary education and training. Exceptional Children, 57, 264–270.
25.
Fay, F. (1996). Clinton approves copyright access. Justice for all: SJU Mobility Disabilities List, Internet, September 17.
26.
Fernald, W. E. (1919). After-care of the patients discharged from Waverly for a period of 25 years. Ungraded, 5, 25–31.
27.
Fine, M., & Asch, A. (1988). Women with disabilities: Essays in psychology, culture, and politics, Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
28.
Fisher, A. T., & Harnisch, D. L. (1989). Career expectations and aspirations of youth with and without handicaps. In T. E. Allen & J. A. Holt (Eds.), Handicapped youth and the outcomes of their schooling: Recent research advances in the United States.New York: Pergamon Press.
29.
Fitts, A. M. (1916). How to fill the gap between the special classes and the institution. Journal of Psycho-Asthenics, 20, 78–87.
30.
Fowler, F. J. (1984). Survey research methods.Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
31.
Frank, A. R., Sitlington, P. L., & Carson, R. R.Young adults with behavioral disorders: A comparison with peers with mild disabilities. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 1995, 3(3), 156–164.
32.
Getzel, E. E.Entering postsecondary programs: Early individualized planning. Teaching Exceptional Children, 1990, 23(1), 51–53.
33.
Gill, D., & Edgar, E.Outcomes of a vocational program designed for students with mild disabilities: The Pierce County Vocational-Special Education Cooperative. Journal for Vocational Special Needs Education, 1990, 12(3), 17–22.
34.
Grant, G.Essay reviews—On equality of educational opportunity: Papers deriving from the Harvard University faculty seminar on the Coleman Report. Harvard Educational Review, 1972, 42(1), 109–125.
35.
Hallahan, D. P., Keller, C. E., & Ball, D. W.A comparison of prevalence rate variability from state to state for each of the categories of special education. Remedial and Special Education, 1986, 7(2), 8–14.
36.
Halpern, A. S. (1990). A methodological review of follow-up and follow-along studies tracking school leavers from special education. Career Development of Exceptional Individuals, 13, 13–27.
37.
Halpern, A. S. (1992). Transition: Old wine in new bottles. Exceptional Children, 202–211.
38.
Hamilton, S. F.Excellence and the transition from school to work. Phi Delta Kappan, 1986, 68(4), 239–242.
39.
Haring, K. A., & Lovett, D. L. (1990). A follow-up study of special education graduates. The Journal of Special Education, 23, 463–477.
40.
Hasazi, S., Gordon, L. R., & Roe, C. A. (1985). Factors associated with the employment status of handicapped youth exiting high school from 1979–1983. Exceptional Children, 51, 455–469.
41.
Hasazi, S. B., Gordon, L. R., Roe, C. A., Hull, M., Finck, K., & Salembier, G. A. (1985). A statewide follow-up on the post high school employment and residential status of students labeled "mentally retarded."Education and Training of the Mentally Retarded, 20, 222–234.
42.
Hasazi, S. B., Johnson, R. E., Hasazi, J. E., Gordon, L. R., & Hull, M. (1989). Employment of youth with and without handicaps following high school: Outcomes and correlates. The Journal of Special Education, 23, 243–255.
43.
Henderson, C. (1995). College freshmen with disabilities: A triennial statistical profile.Washington, DC: American Council on Education, HEATH Resource Center.
44.
Henninger, C. H. (1912). The feeble-minded outside the institution and their relation to society. Journal of Psycho-Asthenics, 16, 151–159.
45.
Kranstover, L. L., Thurlow, M., & Bruininks, R. H.Special education graduates vs. non-graduates: A longitudinal study of outcomes. Career Development of Exceptional Individuals, 1989, 12(2), 153–166.
46.
Kroll, L.G. (1984). LD's—What happens when they are no longer children?Academic Therapy, 20(2), 133–148.
47.
Levine, P. (1992). The case of the missing subject: Missing subjects and response rates in follow-up studies of special and regular education graduates. Unpublished manuscript, University of Washington, Seattle.
48.
Levine, P. (1993). Gender differences in long-term postschool outcomes for youth with mild mental retardation, learning disabilities and no disabilities: Myth or reality? Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Washington, Seattle.
49.
Levine, P., & Edgar, E. (1994). An analysis of respondent agreement in follow-up studies of graduates of special and regular education programs. Exceptional Children, 60, 292–343.
50.
Levine, P., & Edgar, E. (1995). An analysis by gender of long-term postschool outcomes for youth with and without disabilities. Exceptional Children, 61, 282–300.
51.
Lewis, L. (1994). Deaf and hard of hearing students in postsecondary education. Statistical analysis report.Washington, DC: Westat, Inc.
52.
Lichtenstein, S. J. (1989). Postschool patterns of handicapped and nonhandicapped graduates and dropouts. International Journal of Educational Research, 13, 501–531.
53.
Macleod-Gallinger, J. (1985). Secondary school graduate follow-up program for the deaf: Sixth annual report.Rochester, NY: Division of Career Opportunities, Rochester Institute of Technology, National Technical Institute for the Deaf.
54.
Marder, C., & Cox, R. (1991). More than a label: Characteristics of youth with disabilities. In M. Wagner, L. Newman, R. D'Amico, E. D. Jay, P. Butler-Nalin, C. Marder, & R. Cox (Eds.), (1991), Youth with disabilities: How are they doing? The first comprehensive report from the National Longitudinal Transition Study of Special Education Students. Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.
55.
McCay, V. & Lafalce-Landers, E. (1993). A longitudinal study of gifted deaf and hard of hearing people. American Annals of the Deaf, 138, 427–434.
56.
McFall, T. (1966). Postschool adjustment: A survey of fifty former students of classes for the educable mentally retarded. Exceptional Children, 32, 633–634.
57.
Milburn, R. M. (1909). Problems of feeblemindedness. Journal of Psycho-Asthenics, 13, 51–59.
58.
Mithaug, D. E., Horiuchi, C. N., & Fanning, P. N. (1985). A report on the Colorado statewide follow-up survey of special education students. Exceptional Children, 51, 397–404.
59.
Murphy, K., & Welch, F.Wage premiums for college graduates: Recent growth and possible explanations. Educational Researcher, 1989, 18(4), 27–34.
60.
National Information Center for Children and Youth with Handicaps.Sexuality education for children and youth with disabilities. News Digest, 1992, 1(3), 1–28.
61.
Nisbet, J., & Lichtenstein, S. (1992). Gender differences in the postschool status of young adults with mild disabilities. Fact Sheet: Following the Lives of Young Adults, 4, 15.
62.
Nourse, S. W. (1995). Special education students who attend postsecondary educational programs: What programs are attended, who graduates, and does it help? Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Washington, Seattle.
63.
Peterson, L., & Smith, L. (1960). The postschool adjustment of educable mentally retarded adults compared with that of adults with normal intelligence. Exceptional Children, 26, 404–408.
64.
Perry, N. J. (1992, August 10). Why it's so tough to be a girl. Fortune, pp. 82–84.
65.
Pinsent, H. (1906). The employment of the feeble-minded. Journal of Psycho-Asthenics, 9, 184–190.
66.
Quigley, S., Jenne, W., & Phillips, S. (1968). Deaf students in colleges and universities.Washington DC: Alexander Graham Bell Association.
67.
Rogers, A. C. (1907). Minutes of the association: President's annual address. Journal of Psycho-Asthenics, 12, 61–94.
68.
Rousso, H. (1988). Daughters with disabilities: Defective women or minority women? In M. Fine & A. Asch (Eds.), Women with disabilities: Essays in psychology, culture, and politics (pp. 139–171). Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
69.
Rumberger, R. (1987). High school dropout: A review of the issues and evidence. Review of Educational Research, 57, 101–121.
70.
Rumberger, R. W., & Daymont, T. N. (1982, March). The economic value of academic and vocational training acquired in high school. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association.
71.
Saxton, M. & Howe, F. (Eds.). (1987). With wings: An anthology of literature by and about women with disabilities.New York: Feminist Press.
72.
Schalock, R. L., Ross, I., Werbel, G., & Peterson, K.Post secondary community placement of handicapped students: A five-year follow-up analysis. Learning Disability Quarterly, 1986, 9(4), 295–303.
73.
Scuccimarra, D., & Speece, D. (1990). Employment outcomes and social integration of students with mild handicaps: The quality of life two years after high school. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 23, 213–219.
74.
Siegel, S., Park, H.-S., Gumpel, T., Ford, J., Tappe, P., & Gaylord-Ross, R. (1990). Research in vocational special education. In Gaylord-Ross, R. (Ed.), Issues and research in special education (Vol. 1, pp. 173–242). New York: Teachers College Press.
75.
Sigelman, C. K., Schoenrock, C. J., Winer, J. L., Spanhel, C. L., Hromas, S. G., Martin, P. W., Budd, E. C., & Bensberg, G. J. (1981). Issues in interviewing mentally retarded persons: An empirical study. In Deinstitutionalization and community adjustment of mentally retarded people (pp. 114–129). Washington, DC: American Association on Mental Deficiency.
76.
Sitlington, P. L., & Frank, A. R. (1990). Are adolescents with learning disabilities successfully crossing the bridge into adult life?Learning Disability Quarterly, 13(1), 97–111.
77.
Sivard, R. L. (1985). Women … a world survey.Washington, DC: World Priorities.
78.
Tizard, J. (1965). Longitudinal and follow-up studies. In A. M. Clark & A. D. B. Clark (Eds), Mental deficiency, the changing outlook. New York: Free Press.
79.
Van Wagenen, B.Surgical sterilization: An eugenic measure. Journal of Psycho-Asthenics, 1914, 18(4), 185–196.
80.
Vogel, S. A.Adults with learning disabilities: Research questions and methodological issues in planning a research agenda for 2000 and beyond. Canadian Journal of Special Education, 1996, 11(2), 33–54.
81.
Vogel, S. A., & Adelman, P. B. (1992). The success of college students with learning disabilities: Factors related to educational attainment. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 25, 430–441.
82.
Wagner, M. (1992). Being female—A secondary disability? Gender differences in the transition experiences of young people with disabilities.Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.
83.
Wagner, M., Newman, L., D'Amico, R., Jay, E. D., Butler-Nalin, P., Marder, C., & Cox, R. (1991). Youth with disabilities: How are they doing? The first comprehensive report from the National Longitudinal Transition Study of special education students.Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.
84.
Zigmond, N., & Thornton, H.Follow-up of post secondary age learning disabled graduates and dropouts. Learning Disabilities Research, 1985, 1(1), 50–55.
