Many forms of technology, both “high” and “low,” can help individuals with learning disabilities capitalize on their strengths and bypass, or compensate for, their disabilities. This article surveys the current status of assistive technology for this population and reflects on future promises and potential problems. In addition, a model is presented for conceptualizing assistive technology in terms of the types of barriers it helps persons with disabilities to surmount. Several current technologies are described and the research supporting their effectiveness reviewed: word processing, computer-based instruction in reading and other academic areas, interactive videodisc interventions for math, and technologies for daily life. In conclusion, three themes related to the future success of assistive technology applications are discussed: equity of access to technology; ease of technology use; and emergent technologies, such as virtual reality.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Alliance for Technology Access. (1994). Computer resources for people with disabilities.Alameda, CA: Hunter House.
Bangert-Drowns, R. L.The word processor as an instructional tool: A meta-analysis of word processing in writing instruction. Review of Educational Research, 1993, 63(1), 69–93.
4.
Behrmann, M. M. (1994). Assistive technology for students with mild disabilities. Intervention in School and Clinic, 30, 70–83.
5.
Bookshelf [Computer software]. (1994). Richmond, WA: Microsoft Corp.
6.
Boone, R., & Higgins, K. (1993). Hypermedia basal readers: Three years of school-based research. Journal of Special Education Technology, 12, 86–106.
7.
Borgh, K., & Dickson, W. P. (1992). The effects on children's writing of adding speech synthesis to a word processor. Journal of Research on Computing and Education, 24, 533–544.
8.
Bottge, B. A., & Hasselbring, T. S. (1993). A comparison of two approaches for teaching complex, authentic mathematics problems to adolescents in remedial math classes. Exceptional Children, 59, 556–566.
9.
Cavalier, A. R., Ferretti, R. P., & Okolo, C. M. (1994). Technology and individual differences. Journal of Special Education Technology, 12, 175–181.
10.
Chiang, B., & Ford, M.Whole language alternatives for students with learning disabilities. LD Forum, 1990, 16(1), 31–34.
11.
Christensen, C. A., & Gerber, M. M. (1990). Effectiveness of computerized drill and practice games in teaching basic math facts. Exceptionality, 1, 149–165.
12.
Cochran-Smith, M., Paris, C. L., & Kahn, J. L. (1991). Learning to write differently.Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
13.
Collins, T. (1989, March). A summary of the Learning Disabled College Writers Project at the University of Minnesota-General College. Paper presented at the annual Conference on College Composition and Communication, Seattle, WA. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 303 819)
14.
Collins, T., Engen-Wedin, N., Margolis, W., & Price, L. (1987). Learning disabled writers and word processing: Performance and attitude gains. Research & Teaching in Developmental Education, 4(1), 13–20.
15.
Collins, T., & Price, L. (1986). Testimony from learning disabled college writers on the efficacy of word processing in their writing process.Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Learning Disabled College Writers Project. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 267 411)
16.
Co:Writer (Version 2.0) [Computer software]. (1992–94). Wauconda, IL: Don Johnston.
17.
Dalton, B., Winburg, N. E., & Morocco, C. C. (1990). "If you could just push a button": Two fourth grade boys with learning disabilities learn to use a computer spelling checker. Journal of Special Education Technology, 10, 177–191.
18.
Darter, C. L., Jr., & Phelps, L. N. (1990). The impact of the computer on the teaching of reading: A review of the literature. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 326 836)
19.
Edyburn, D. L. (1991). Fact retrieval by students with and without learning handicaps using print and electronic encyclopedias. Journal of Special Education Technology, 11, 75–90.
20.
Fais, L., & Wanderman, R. (1987). A computer-aided writing program for learning disabled adolescents.Litchfield, CT: The Forman School. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 293 273)
21.
Gersten, R., & Dimino, J.Visions and revisions: A special education perspective on the whole language controversy. Special Education and Remedial Education, 1993, 14(4), 5–13.
22.
Gordon, J., Vaughn, S., & Schumm, J. S. (1993). Spelling interventions: A review of literature and implications for instruction for students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 8, 175–181.
23.
Graham, S., & MacArthur, C. (1988). Improving learning disabled students' skills at revising essays produced on a word processor: Self-instructional strategy training. The Journal of Special Education, 22, 133–152.
24.
Haapa, B. L., & Lewis, R. B.Designing word processing software for specific populations: Individuals with hearing impairments and those with learning disabilities. Closing the Gap, 1992a, 10(6), 12, 15.
25.
Haapa, B. L., & Lewis, R. B. (1992b). The impact of grammar checking and auditory feedback on the writing performance of students with disabilities. In H. J. Murphy (Ed.), Proceedings of the seventh annual conference: "Technology and Persons with Disabilities" (pp. 215–219). North-ridge, CA: Office of Disabled Student Services, California State University, North-ridge.
26.
Hasselbring, T. S., Goin, L. I., & Bransford, J. D.Developing math automaticity in learning handicapped children: The role of computerized drill and practice. Focus on Exceptional Children, 1988, 20(6), 1–7.
27.
Hawisher, G. E. (1989). Research and recommendations for computers and composition. In G. E. Hawisher & C. L. Selfe (Eds.), Critical perspectives on computers and composition instruction (pp. 44–69). New York: Teachers College Press.
28.
Hebert, B. M., & Murdock, J. Y. (1994). Comparing three computer-aided instruction output modes to teach vocabulary words to students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 9, 136–141.
29.
Helsel-Dewert, M., & Van Der Meiracker, M.The intelligibility of synthetic speech to learning handicapped children. Journal of Special Education Technology, 1987, 9(1), 38–44.
30.
Higgins, K., & Boone, R. (1990). Hypertext computer study guides and the social studies achievement of students with learning disabilities, remedial students, and regular education students. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 23, 529–540.
31.
Higgins, K., & Boone, R.Hypermedia CAI: A supplement to an elementary school basal reader program. Journal of Special Education Technology, 1991, 11(1), 1–15.
32.
Higgins, K., & Boone, R. (1993). Technology as a tutor, tool, and agent for reading. Journal of Special Education Technology, 12, 29–37.
33.
Holzberg, C. S.Sound and image: The world on a disc. inCider/A+, 1991, 9(11), 30–34.
Kerchner, L. B., & Kistinger, B. J. (1984). Language processing/word processing: Written expression, computers, and learning disabled students. Learning Disability Quarterly, 7, 329–335.
Kinnaman, D. E.2.5 million strong— and growing. Technology & Learning, 1992, 13(1), 67.
40.
Koscinski, S. T., & Gast, D. L. (1993). Computer-assisted instruction with constant time delay to teach multiplication facts to students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 8, 157–168.
41.
LaQuey, T., & Ryer, J. C. (1994). The internet companion (Voyager electronic ed.). Santa Monica, CA: Voyager.
42.
Layton, K. (1991). Closed-captioned television: A viable technology for the reading teacher. Reading Teacher, 44, 598–599.
43.
Leahy, P. (1991). A multi-year formative evaluation of IBM's "Writing to Read" program. Reading Improvement, 28, 257–264.
44.
Lerner, J. W. (1993). Learning disabilities (6th ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
45.
Lerner, J. W., Cousin, P. T., & Richeck, M. (1992). Critical issues in learning disabilities: Whole language learning. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 7, 226–230.
46.
Lewis, R. B. (1993). Special education technology: Classroom applications.Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
47.
Lewis, R. B. (1997). Changes in technology use in California's special education programs. Remedial and Special Education, 18, 233–242.
48.
Lewis, R. B., & Doorlag, D. H. (1995). Teaching special students in the mainstream (4th ed.). Columbus, OH: Merrill.
49.
Lewis, R. B., Harrison, P. J., Lynch, E. W., & Saba, F. (1994). Applications of technology in special education: A statewide study. Learning Disabilities: A Multidisci-plinary Journal, 5, 69–79.
50.
Lindsey, J. D. (Ed.). (1993). Computers and exceptional individuals (2nd ed.). Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
51.
MacArthur, C. A., & Graham, S.Learning disabled students' composing under three methods of text production: Handwriting, word processing, and dictation. The Journal of Special Education, 1987, 21(3), 22–42.
52.
MacArthur, C. A., & Schwartz, S. S.An integrated approach to writing instruction: The Computers and Writing Instruction Project. LD Forum, 1990, 16(1), 35–41.
53.
MacArthur, C. A., Schwartz, S. S., & Graham, S. (1991). A model for writing instruction: Integrating word processing and strategy instruction into a process approach to writing. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 6, 230–236.
54.
Male, M. (1994). Technology for inclusion.Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
55.
Massey, H. J. (1998). Language-impaired children's comprehension of synthesized speech. Language, Speech, and Hearing in Schools, 19, 401–409.
56.
Mastering Fractions [Videodisc program]. (1985). Washington, DC: Systems Impact.
57.
Mather, N. (1992). Whole language reading instruction for students with learning disabilities: Caught in the cross fire. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 7, 87–95.
McDermott, P. A., & Stegemann, J. H. (1987). The comparative effects of computer-assisted instruction on motivation and achievement of learning disabled and non-learning disabled students.Philadelphia: Pennsylvania University. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 309 611)
60.
McGregor, G., Drossner, D., & Axelrod, S. (1990). Increasing instructional efficiency: A comparison of voice plus text vs. text alone on the error rate of students with mild disabilities during CAI. Journal of Special Education Technology, 10, 192–197.
61.
Microsoft Word (Version 5.1) [Computer software]. (1992). Richmond, WA: Microsoft Corp.
62.
Morocco, C. C., & Neuman, S. B., with Bullock, M., Cushman, H., Neale, A., Packard, D., & Traversi, D. (1985). Teaching children to write with computers: Comparing approaches.Newton, MA: Education Development Center. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 327 036)
63.
Morocco, C. C., Neuman, S. B., Cushman, H., Packard, D., & Neale, A. E. (1987). Teachers, children and the magical writing machine: Instructional contexts for word processing with learning disabled children.Newton, MA: Education Development Center. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 296 492)
64.
Neuman, S. B., & Morocco, C. C., with Bullock, M., Cushman, H., Neale, A., Packard, D., & Traversi, D. (1985). A model teaching environment for using word processors with LD children.Newton, MA: Education Development Center. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 327 037)
65.
Newcomer, P. L., & Barenbaum, E. M. (1991). The written composing ability of children with learning disabilities: A review of the literature from 1980 to 1990. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 10, 578–593.
66.
Office of Technology Assessment. (1988). Power on! New tools for teaching and learning.Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
67.
Okolo, C. M. (1992). The effect of computer-assisted instruction format and initial attitude on the arithmetic facts proficiency and continuing motivation of students with learning disabilities. Exceptionality, 3, 195–211.
68.
Okolo, C. M., Bahr, C. M., & Rieth, H. J. (1993). A retrospective view of computer-based instruction. Journal of Special Education Technology, 12, 1–27.
69.
Okolo, C. M., Hinsey, M., & Yousefian, B.Learning disabled students' acquisition of keyboarding skills and continued motivation under drill-and-practice and game conditions. Learning Disabilities Research, 1990, 5(2), 100–109.
70.
Outhred, L. (1987). To write or not to write: Does using a word processor assist reluctant writers? Australia and New Zealand Journal of Developmental Disabilities, 13, 211–217.
71.
Outhred, L. (1989). Word processing: Its impact on children's writing. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 22, 262–264.
Raskind, M., & Higgins, E. (1993, February). The compensatory effectiveness of assistive technology on postsecondary students with learning disabilities. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Conference of the Learning Disabilities Association, San Francisco.
74.
Russell, R. G. (1991, April). A meta-analysis of word processing and attitudes and the impact on the quality of writing. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.
75.
Salpeter, J.Answers to your questions about CD-ROM. Classroom Computer Learning, 1988, 8(6), 18.
76.
Scherer, M. J. (1993). Living in the state of stuck: How technology impacts the lives of people with disabilities.Cambridge, MA: Brookline Books.
77.
Scrogan, L. (Ed.). (1988). The OTA report: New technologies are making a difference. Classroom Computer Learning, 9(2), 33–42.
78.
Slavin, R. E. (1991). Reading effects of IBM's "Writing to Read" program: A review of evaluations. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 13, 1–11.
79.
SmartVoice [Computer software]. (1994). St. Clair Shores, MI: Quality Computers.
80.
Smith, L. G., Siders, J. A., & Oshrin, S. E. (1987). Intelligibility of computer synthesized speech among mildly handicapped and nonhandicapped youth. In D. L. Johnson, C. D. Maddux, & A. C. Candler (Eds.), Computers in the special education classroom (pp. 75–79). New York: Haworth.
81.
Stoddard, B., & MacArthur, C. A.A peer editor strategy: Guiding learning-disabled students in response and revision. Research in the Teaching of English, 1993, 27(1), 76–103.
82.
Swanson, H. L. (1989). Strategy instruction: Overview of principles and procedures for effective use. Learning Disability Quarterly, 12, 3–14.
83.
The Amazing Writing Machine [Computer software]. (1994). Novato, CA: Brøder-bund.
84.
The Writing Center [Computer software]. (1991). Fremont, CA: Learning Co.
85.
Thompson, R. A. (1990, July). The relative effectiveness of computer assisted instruction (CAD for teaching students to read English. Paper presented at the 13th World Congress on Reading, Stockholm, Sweden. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 322 479)
86.
Torgesen, J. K. (1977). The role of nonspecific factors in the task performance of learning disabled children: A theoretical assessment. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 10, 27–34.
87.
Typing Tutor 6 [Computer software]. (1994). Indianapolis, IN: Que Software.
88.
U.S. Congress, Office of Technology Assessment. (1988). Power on! New tools for teaching and learning, OTA-SET-379. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
89.
U.S. Department of Education. (1996). Eighteenth annual report to congress on the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act.Washington, DC: Author.
90.
VanProoyen, N., & Clouse, R. W. (1994). Three approaches to teaching reading: Basal, language experience, and computer-assisted instruction. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 366 910)
91.
Wanderman, R. (1994, October). High and low tech tools and advice for students and adults with learning disabilities. Paper presented at the annual Closing the Gap Microcomputer Technology in Special Education and Rehabilitation Conference, Minneapolis, MN.
92.
Watkins, M. W. (1989). Computerized drill-and-practice and academic attitudes of learning disabled students. Journal of Special Education Technology, 9, 167–172.
93.
Wise, B. W., & Olson, R. K. (1994). Computer speech and the remediation of reading and spelling problems. Journal of Special Education Technology, 12, 207–220.
94.
Woodward, J. (1992). Virtual reality and its potential use in special education: Identifying emerging issues and trends in technology for special education.Washington, DC: COSMOS Corp. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 350 766)
95.
Woodward, J., & Carnine, D. (1993). Use of technology for mathematics assessment and instruction: Reflection on a decade of innovations. Journal of Special Education Technology, 12, 38–48.
96.
Write:OutLoud (Version 2.0) [Computer software]. (1992). Wauconda, IL: Don Johnston.
97.
Write This Way [Computer software]. (1992). Dimondale, MI: Hartley Courseware.
98.
Yau, M., Ziegler, S., & Siegel, L. (1990). Lap top computers and the learning disabled student: A study of the value of portable computers to the writing progress of students with fine motor problems.Toronto, Canada: Toronto Board of Education, Library Services Department. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 320 342)
