State Disparities in the Diagnosis and Placement of Pupils with Learning Disabilities

Abstract

We investigated the hypothesis that interstate disparities in the diagnosis of pupils with learning disabilities (LD) are more strongly correlated with demographic and sociopolitical factors than with the biological prevalence of the disability. We also investigated the relationship of these factors to placement practices. Thirteen independent variables representing state characteristics were simultaneously regressed against each of seven static dependent variables, measuring diagnostic and placement practices in 1989, and two dynamic dependent variables, measuring changes in practices between 1976 and 1989. Results of the regression indicated that although demographic and sociopolitical factors explained none of the total prevalence of the four most common physical disabilities (adjusted R ²[R ²] = 0), they did explain to a moderate degree the state prevalence of LD (R ² ranged from .15 to .28), and were more predictive still depending on measure of LD prevalence. Moreover, these same factors strongly predicted the extent to which states mainstreamed their pupils (R ² = .59) and the size of the nonmainstreamed cognitively disabled (LD and educable mentally retarded) population (R ² = .56).

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Algozzine, B. , & Korinek, L. (1985). Where is special education for students with high prevalence handicaps going? Exceptional Children, 51, 388–394.

Goldberger, A. (1991). A course in econometrics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Hallahan, D. , Keller, C. , & Ball, D. A comparison of prevalence rate variability from state to state for each of the categories of special education. Remedial and Special Education, 1986, 7(2), 8–14.

Kelman, M. , & Lester, G. (in press). Jumping the queue: An inquiry into the legal treatment of students with learning disabilities. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Keough, B. (1986). Future of the LD field: Research and practice. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 19, 455–460.

Linn, R. (1986). Quantitative methods in research on teaching. In M. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 92–118). New York: Macmillan.

Mercer, C. (1983). Students with learning disabilities (2nd ed.). Columbus, OH: C.E. Merrill.

Moore, A. (1995). Structural equation modeling in special education research. Remedial and Special Education, 16, 178–183.

Noel, M. , & Fuller, B. The social policy construction of special education: The impact of state characteristics on identification and integration of handicapped children. Remedial and Special Education, 1985, 6(3), 27–35.

10.

Patrick, J. , & Reschley, D. (1982). Relationship of state educational criteria and demographic variables to school system prevalence of mental retardation. American Journal of Mental Retardation, 86, 351–360.

11.

Reynolds, C. (1984). Critical measurement issues in learning disabilities. The Journal of Special Education, 18, 451–476.

12.

Shepard, L. , & Smith, M. (1983). An evaluation of the identification of learning disabled students in Colorado. Learning Disability Quarterly, 6, 115–127.

13.

Singer, J. , Palfrey, J. , Butler, J. , & Walker, D. (1989). Variation in special education classification across school districts: How does where you live affect what you are labeled? American Educational Research Journal, 26, 261–281.

14.

U.S. Department of Education . (1979). Progress toward a free appropriate public education of all handicapped children: A report to Congress on the implementation of Public Law 92–142: The Education for All Handicapped Children Act (Table D-1.6). Washington, DC: Author. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 175 196)

15.

U.S. Department of Education . (1991). To assure the free appropriate public education of all handicapped children: Thirteenth annual report to Congress on the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (Tables AA20, AA23, AB2). Washington, DC: Author. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 332 488)

16.

U.S. Department of Education . (1992). To assure the free appropriate public education of all handicapped children: Fourteenth annual report to Congress on the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (pp. 15–16). Washington, DC: Author. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 347 779)