Secondary students with learning disabilities generally make inadequate progress in mathematics. Their achievement is often limited by a variety of factors, including prior low achievement, low expectations for success, and inadequate instruction. This article will discuss techniques that have been demonstrated to be effective with secondary students who have learning disabilities in mathematics.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Algozzine, B., O'Shea, D. J., Crews, W. B., & Stoddard, K. (1987). Analysis of mathematics competence of learning disabled adolescents. The Journal of Special Education, 21, 97–107.
2.
Archer, A., & Isaacson, S. (1989). Design and delivery of academic instruction.Reston, VA: Council for Exceptional Children.
3.
Becker, W. C., & Carnine, D. W. (1981). Direct instruction: A behavior theory model for comprehensive educational intervention with the disadvantaged. In S. W. Bijou & R. Ruiz (Eds.), Behavior modification: Contributions to education (pp. 145–210). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
4.
Bereiter, C. (1994). Constructivism, socioculturalism, and Popper's World 3. Educational Researcher, 23, (7), 21–23.
5.
Bottge, B. A., & Hasselbring, T. S. (1993). A comparison of two approaches for teaching complex, authentic mathematics problems to adolescents in remedial math classes. Exceptional Children, 59, 556–566.
6.
Bransford, J. D., Sherwood, R. D., Hasselbring, T. S., Kinzer, C. K., & Williams, S. M. (1990). Anchored instruction: Why we need it and how technology can help. In D. Nix & R. Spiro (Eds.), Cognition, education, multimedia (pp. 115–141). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
7.
Brophy, J. E., & Good, T. L. (1974). Teacher-student relationships: Causes and consequences.New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
8.
Carnine, D. (1980). Preteaching vs. poor readersconcurrent teaching of the component skills of a multiplication algorithm. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 11, 375–379.
9.
Carnine, D. (1989). Designing practice activities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 22, 603–607.
10.
Carnine, D. (1992). Expanding the notion of teachers' rights: Access to tools that work. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 25, 13–19.
11.
Carpenter, R. L. (1985). Mathematics instruction in resource rooms. Learning Disability Quarterly, 8, 95–100.
12.
Carpenter, T. P., Matthews, W., Linquist, M. M., & Silver, E. A. (1984). Achievement in mathematics: Results from the national assessment. Elementary School Journal, 84, 485–495.
13.
Case, L. P., Harris, K. R., & Graham, S. (1992). Improving the mathematical problem-solving skills of students with learning disabilities: Self-regulated strategy development. The Journal of Special Education, 26, 1–19.
14.
Cawley, J. F., Fitzmaurice, A. M., Shaw, R., Kahn, H., & Bates, H., III. (1978). Mathematics and learning disabled youth: The upper grade levels. Learning Disability Quarterly, 1, (4), 37–52.
15.
Cawley, J. F., Fitzmaurice, A. M., Shaw, R., Kahn, H., & Bates, H., III. (1979). LD youth and mathematics: A review of characteristics. Learning Disability Quarterly, 2, (1), 29–44.
16.
Cawley, J. F., & Miller, J. H. (1989). Cross-sectional comparisons of the mathematical performance of children with learning disabilities: Are we on the right track toward comprehensive programming?. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 22, 250–259.
17.
Chapman, J. (1988). Learning disabled children's self-concepts. Review of Educational Research, 58, 347–371.
18.
Chow, S. (1981). A study of academic learning time of mainstreamed LD students.San Francisco: Far West Laboratory for Educational Research.
19.
Christenson, S. L., Ysseldyke, J. E., & Thurlow, M. (1989). Critical instructional factors for students with mild handicaps: An integrative review. Remedial and Special Education, 20, (5), 21–31.
20.
Cobb, P. (1988). The tension between theories of learning and instruction in mathematics education. Educational Psychologist, 23, 87–103.
21.
Cobb, P. (1994a). Constructivism in mathematics and science education. Educational Researcher, 23, (7), 4
22.
Cobb, P. (1994b). Where is the mind? Constructivist and sociocultural perspectives on mathematical development. Educational Researcher, 23, (7), 13–20.
23.
Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt University. (1991). Technology and design of generative learning environments. Educational Technology, 3, (5), 34–40.
24.
Cybriwsky, C. A., & Schuster, J. W. (1990). Using constant delay procedures to teach multiplication facts. Remedial and Special Education, 21, (1), 54–59.
25.
Darch, C., Carnine, D., & Gersten, R. (1984). Explicit instruction in mathematics problem solving. Journal of Educational Research, 77, 350–359.
26.
Deshler, D. D., & Schumaker, J. B. (1986). Learning strategies: An instructional alternative for low achieving adolescents. Exceptional Children, 52, 583–590.
27.
Driver, R., Asoko, H., Leach, J., Mortimer, E., & Scott, P. (1994). Constructing scientific knowledge in the classroom. Educational Researcher, 23, (7), 5–12.
28.
Ellis, E. S., Lenz, B. K., & Sabornie, E. J. (1987a). Generalization and adaptation of learning strategies to natural environments: Part 1. Critical agents. Remedial and Special Education, 8, (1), 6–20.
29.
Ellis, E. S., Lenz, B. K., & Sabornie, E. J. (1987b). Generalization and adaptation of learning strategies to natural environments: Part 2. Research into practice. Remedial and Special Education, 8, (2), 6–23.
30.
Engelmann, S. (1993). Priorities and efficiency. LD Forum, 18, (2), 5–8.
31.
Engelmann, S., & Carnine, D. (1982). Theory of instruction: Principles and applications.New York: Irvington.
32.
Fuchs, L. S., & Deno, S. L. (1991). Paradigmatic distinctions between instructionally relevant measurement models. Exceptional Children, 57, 488–499.
33.
Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., & Deno, S. L. (1985). Importance of goal ambitiousness and goal mastery to student achievement. Exceptional Children, 52, 63–71.
34.
Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Hamlett, C. L., & Steckler, P. M. (1990). The role of skills analysis in curriculum-based measurement in math. School Psychology Review, 19, 6–22.
35.
Gadanidis, G. (1994). Deconstructing constructivism. The Mathematics Teacher, 87, (2), 91–97.
36.
Gersten, R. (1985). Direct instruction with special education students: A review of evaluation research. The Journal of Special Education, 19, 41–58.
37.
Harris, K. R., & Graham, S. (1994). Constructivism: Principles, paradigms, and integration. The Journal of Special Education, 28, 233–247.
38.
Hasselbring, T. S., Goin, L. T., & Bransford, J. D. (1988). Developing math automaticity in learning handicapped children: The role of computerized drill and practice. Focus on Exceptional Children, 20, (6), 1–7.
39.
Hasselbring, T. S., Sherwood, R. D., Bransford, J. D., Mertz, J., Estes, B., Marsh, J., & Van Haneghan, J. (1991). An evaluation of specific videodisc courseware on student learning in a rural school environment (Final Report). Nashville: Peabody College of Vanderbilt University, The Learning Technology Center. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 338 225)
40.
Hutchinson, N. L. (1993). The effect of cognitive instruction on algebra problem solving of adolescents with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 16, 34–63.
41.
Jitendra, A. K., Kameenui, E., & Carnine, D. (1994). An exploratory evaluation of dynamic assessment of the role of basals on comprehension of mathematical operations. Education and Treatment of Children, 17, 139–162.
42.
Kameenui, E. J., & Simmons, D. C. (1990). Designing instructional strategies: The prevention of academic problems.Columbus, OH: Merrill.
43.
Kelly, B., Gersten, R., & Carnine, D. (1990). Student error patterns as a function of curriculum design: Teaching fractions to remedial high school students and high school students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 23, 23–29.
44.
Koscinski, S. T., & Gast, D. L. (1993). Use of constant time delay in teaching multiplication facts to students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 26, 533–544, 567.
45.
Koscinski, S. T., & Hoy, C. (1993). Teaching multiplication facts to students with learning disabilities: The promise of constant time delay procedures. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 8, 260–263.
46.
Lenz, B. K., & Deshler, D. D. (1990). Principles of strategies instruction as the basis of effective preservice teacher education. Teacher Education and Special Education, 13, 82–95.
47.
Madden, N. A., & Slavin, R. E. (1983). Effects of cooperative learning on the social acceptance of mainstreamed academically handicapped students. The Journal of Special Education, 17, 171–182.
48.
Maheady, L., Sacca, M. K., & Harper, G. F. (1987). Classwide student tutoring teams: The effects of peer-mediated instruction on the academic performance of secondary mainstreamed students. The Journal of Special Education, 22, 107–121.
49.
McLeod, T. M., & Armstrong, S. W. (1982). Learning disabilities in mathematics—Skill deficits and remedial approaches at the intermediate and secondary level. Learning Disability Quarterly, 5, 305–311.
50.
McLoone, B., Scruggs, T., Mastropieri, M., & Zucker, S. (1986). Memory strategy instruction and training with LD adolescents. Learning Disabilities Research, 2, (1), 45–53.
51.
Mercer, C. D., Jordan, L., & Miller, S. P. (1994). Implications of constructivism for teaching math to students with moderate to mild disabilities. The Journal of Special Education, 28, 290–306.
52.
Mercer, C. D., & Miller, S. P. (1992). Teaching students with learning problems in math to acquire, understand, and apply basic math facts. Remedial and Special Education, 13, (3), 19–35, 61.
53.
Montague, M. (1992). The effects of cognitive and metacognitive strategy instruction on the mathematical problem solving of middle school students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 25, 230–248.
54.
Montague, M., & Bos, C. S. (1986). The effect of cognitive strategy training on verbal math problem solving performance of learning disabled adolescents. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 19, 26–33.
55.
Montague, M., Bos, C., & Doucette, M. (1991). Affective, cognitive, and metacognitive attributes of eighth-grade mathematical problem solvers. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 6, 145–151.
56.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics.Reston, VA: Author.
57.
Nesher, P. (1976). Three determinants of difficulty in verbal arithmetic problems. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 7, 369–388.
58.
Pajares, F., & Miller, M. D. (1994). Role of self-efficacy and self-concept beliefs in mathematical problem solving: A path analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 193–203.
59.
Perkins, V., & Cullinan, D. (1985). Effects of direct instruction for fraction skills. Education and Treatment of Children, 8, 41–50.
60.
Poplin, M. S. (1988a). Holistic/constructivist principles of the teaching/learning process: Implications for the field of learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 21, 401–416.
61.
Poplin, M. S. (1988b). The reductionistic fallacy in learning disabilities: Replicating the past by reducing the present. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 21, 389–400.
62.
Pressley, M., Harris, K. R., & Marks, M. R. (1992). But good strategy instructors are constructivists!Educational Psychology Review, 4, 3–31.
63.
Pressley, M., Symons, S., Snyder, B. L., & Cariglia-Bull, T. (1989). Strategy instruction research comes of age. Learning Disability Quarterly, 12, 16–30.
64.
Reid, D. K., Kurkjian, C., & Carruthers, S. S. (1994). Special education teachers interpret constructivist teaching. Remedial and Special Education, 15, 267–280.
65.
Reith, H., & Evertson, C. (1988). Variables related to the effective instruction of difficult-to-teach children. Focus on Exceptional Children, 20, (5), 1–8.
66.
Reschly, D. J. (1992). Special education decision making and functional/behavioral assessment. In W. Stainback & S. Stainback (Eds.), Controversial issues confronting special education: Divergent perspectives (pp. 127–138). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
67.
Rivera, D., & Smith, D. D. (1988). Using a demonstration strategy to teach midschool students with learning disabilities how to compute long division. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 21, 77–81.
68.
Rosenshine, B. (1976). Classroom instruction. In N. L. Gage (Ed.), The psychology of teaching methods.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
69.
Rosenshine, B., & Stevens, R. (1986). Teaching functions. In M. C. Whittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 376–391).
70.
Silbert, J., Carnine, D., & Stein, M. (1990). Direct instruction mathematics (2nd ed.). Columbus, OH: Merrill.
71.
Slavin, R. E. (1983). When does cooperative learning increase student achievement?. Psychological Bulletin, 94, 429–445.
72.
Slavin, R. E. (1984). Team assisted individualization: Cooperative learning and individualized instruction in the mainstreamed classroom. Remedial and Special Education, 5, (6), 33–42.
73.
Slavin, R. E., & Karweit, N. L. (1981). Cognitive and affective outcomes of an intensive student team learning experience. Journal of Experimental Education, 50, 29–35.
74.
Slavin, R. E., & Karweit, N. L. (1984). Mastery learning and student teams: A factorial experiment in urban general mathematics classes. American Journal of Educational Research, 21, 725–736.
75.
Slavin, R. E., Leavey, M., & Madden, N. A. (1984). Combining cooperative learning and individualized instruction: Effects on student mathematics achievement, attitudes, and behaviors. Elementary School Journal, 84, 409–422.
76.
Slavin, R. E., Madden, N. A., & Leavey, M. (1984). Effects of team assisted individualization on the mathematics achievement of academically handicapped and nonhandicapped students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 813–819.
77.
Stevens, K. B., & Schuster, J. W., (1988). Time delay: Systematic instruction for academic tasks. Remedial and Special Education, 9, (5), 16–21.
78.
Swing, S. R., Stoiber, K. C., & Peterson, P. L. (1988). Thinking skills vs. learning time: Effects of alternative classroom-based interventions on students' mathematics problem solving. Cognition and Instruction, 5, 123–191.
79.
Tennyson, R. D., & Park, O. (1980). The teaching of concepts: A review of instructional design research literature. Review of Educational Research, 50, 55–70.
80.
Woodward, J. (1991). Procedural knowledge in mathematics: The role of the curriculum. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 24, 242–251.
81.
Wright, J. P. (1968). A study of children's performance on verbally stated problems containing word clues and omitting them. Dissertation Abstracts International, 29, 1770B.
82.
Zigmond, N. (1990). Rethinking secondary school programs for students with learning disabilities. Focus on Exceptional Children, 23, (1), 2–22.
