Adelman, P. B., & Vogel, S. A. (1991). The learning-disabled adult. In B. Y. L. Wong (Ed.), Learning about learning disabilities (pp. 564–594). San Diego: Academic Press.
2.
Beirne-Smith, M. (1991). Peer tutoring in arithmetic for children with learning disabilities. Exceptional Children, 57, 330–337.
3.
Blankenship, C. S. (1978). Remediating systematic inversion errors in subtraction through the use of demonstration and feedback. Learning Disability Quarterly, 1, 12–22.
4.
Blankenship, C. S., & Baumgartner, M. D. (1982). Programming generalization of computational skills. Learning Disability Quarterly, 5, 152–162.
5.
Bley, N. S., & Thornton, C. A. (1995). Teaching mathematics to students with learning disabilities.Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
6.
Bloom, B. S. (Ed.). (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives.New York: McKay.
7.
Bottge, B. A., & Hasselbring, T. S. (1993). A comparison of two approaches for teaching complex, authentic mathematics problems to adolescents in remedial math classes. Exceptional Children, 59, 556–566.
8.
Carnine, D., Engelmann, S., Hofmeister, A., & Kelly, B. (1987). Videodisc instruction in fractions. Focus on Learning Problems in Mathematics, 9, (1), 31–52.
9.
Carpenter, T. P., Coburn, T. G., Reyes, R. E., & Wilson, J. W. (1976). Notes from the national assessment: Problem solving. Mathematics Teacher, 32, 389–393.
10.
Carpenter, T. P., Corbitt, M. K., Kepner, H. S., Jr., Lindquist, M. M., & Reyes, R. E. (1981). Results from the second mathematics assessment of the national assessment of educational progress.Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
11.
Case, L. P., & Harris, K. R. (1988, April). Self-instructional strategy training: Improving mathematical problem solving skills of learning disabled students. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans.
12.
Case, L. P., Harris, K. R., & Graham, S. (1992). Improving the mathematical problem-solving skills of students with learning disabilities: Self-regulated strategy development. The Journal of Special Education, 26, 1–19.
13.
Cawley, J. F., Baker-Kroczynski, S., & Urban, A. (1992). Seeking excellence in mathematics education for students with mild disabilities. Teaching Exceptional Children, 24, 40–43.
14.
Cawley, J. F., & Miller, J. H. (1989). Cross-sectional comparisons of the mathematical performance of children with learning disabilities: Are we on the right track toward comprehensive programming?. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 23, 250–254, 259.
15.
Cawley, J. F., & Parmar, R. S. (1992). Arithmetic programming for students with disabilities: An alternative. Remedial and Special Education, 13, (3), 6–18.
16.
Chiang, B. (1986). Initial learning and transfer effects of microcomputer drills on LD students' multiplication skills. Learning Disability Quarterly, 9, 118–123.
17.
Cobb, P., Yackel, E., & Wood, T. (1992). A constructivist alternative to the representational view of mind in mathematics education. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 23, 2–33.
18.
Collins, M., & Carnine, D. (1988). Evaluating the field test revision process by comparing two versions of a reasoning skills CAI program. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 21, 375–379.
19.
Conference Board of the Mathematical Sciences. (1995, May). Adopted statement at CBMS Council meeting.Washington, DC: CBMS.
20.
Cooney, T. J. (1994). Research and teacher education: In search of common ground. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 25, 608–636.
21.
Cybriwsky, C. A., & Schuster, J. W. (1990). Using constant delay procedures to teach multiplication facts. Remedial and Special Education, 11, (1), 54–59.
22.
Dangel, H. L., & Ensminger, E. E. (1988). The use of a discrepancy formula with LD students. Learning Disabilities Focus, 4, (1), 24–31.
23.
Dossey, J., Mullis, I., Lindquist, M., & Chambers, D. (1988). The mathematics report card: Are we measuring up?Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
24.
Driscoll, M. (1983). Research within reach: Secondary school mathematics.Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
25.
Englert, C. S., Culatta, B. E., & Horn, D. G. (1987). Influence of irrelevant information in addition word problems on problem solving. Learning Disability Quarterly, 10, 29–36.
26.
Epps, S., Ysseldyke, J. E., & McGue, M. (1984). “I know one when I see one”—Differentiating LD from non-LD students. Learning Disability Quarterly, 7, 89–101.
27.
Fennema, E., Carpenter, T. P., & Lamon, S. J. (Eds.). (1988). Integrating research on teaching and learning mathematics.Albany: State University of New York Press.
28.
Feuer, M. J., & Fulton, K. (1993). The many faces of performance assessment. Phi Delta Kappan, 74, (6), 478
29.
Frame, R. E., Clarizio, H. F., & Porter, A. (1984). Diagnostic and prescriptive bias in school psychologists' reports of a learning disabled child. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 17, 12–15.
30.
Friedman, S. G., & Hofmeister, A. M. (1984). Matching technology to content and learners: A case study. Exceptional Children, 51, 130–134.
31.
Fuchs, L. S., Bahr, C. M., & Rieth, H. J. (1989). Effects of goal structures and performance contingencies on math performance of adolescents with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 22, 554–560.
32.
Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., & Hamlett, C. L. (1989). Computers and curriculum-based measurement: Effects of teacher feedback systems. School Psychology Review, 18, 112–125.
33.
Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Hamlett, C. L., & Stecker, P. M. (1990). The contribution of skills analysis to curriculum-based measurement in math. School Psychology Review, 19, 6–22.
34.
Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Hamlett, C. L., & Stecker, P. M. (1991). Effects of curriculum-based measurement and consultation on teacher planning and student achievement in mathematics operations. American Educational Research Journal, 28, 617–641.
35.
Gagné, R. M. (Ed.). (1962). Psychological principles in system development.New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
36.
Garnett, K. (1987). Math learning disabilities: Teaching and learners. Reading, Writing, and Learning Disabilities, 3, 1–8.
37.
Garnett, K., & Fleischner, J. E. (1983). Automatization and basic fact performance of normal and learning disabled children. Learning Disability Quarterly, 6, 223–231.
38.
Geary, D. C. (1990). A componential analysis of an early learning deficit in mathematics. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 49, 363–383.
39.
Geary, D. C. (1993). Mathematical disabilities: Cognitive, neuropsychological, and genetic components. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 345–362.
40.
Gersten, R., Carnine, D., & Woodward, J. (1987). Direct instruction research: The third decade. Remedial and Special Education, 8, (6), 48–56.
41.
Ginsburg, H. P. (1989). Children's arithmetic: How they learn it and how you teach it (2nd ed.). Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
42.
Gleason, M., Carnine, D., & Boriero, D. (1990). Improving CAI effectiveness with attention to instructional design in teaching story problems to mildly handicapped students. Journal of Special Education Technology, 30, (3), 129–136.
43.
Goldin, G. A., & McClintock, C. E. (Eds.). (1984). Task variables in mathematical problem solving.Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
44.
Goldman, S. R., Pellegrino, J. W., & Mertz, D. L. (1988). Extended practice of basic addition facts: Strategy changes in learning disabled students. Cognition & Instruction, 5, 223–265.
45.
Graves, A., Landers, M. F., Lokerson, J., Luchow, J., Horvath, M., & Garnett, K. (1992). The DLD competencies for teachers of students with learning disabilities.Reston, VA: Division for Learning Disabilities, Council for Exceptional Children.
46.
Hammill, D. D. (Ed.). (1987). Assessing the abilities and instructional needs of students.Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
47.
Harding, D., Gust, A. M., Goldhawk, S. L., & Bierman, M. M. (1993). The effects of the Interactive Unit on the computation skills of students with learning disabilities and students with mild cognitive impairments. Learning Disabilities: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 4, (2), 53–65.
48.
Hécaen, H., Angelergues, R., & Houillier, S. (1961). Les variétiés clinique des acalculies au cours des lésions rétrorolandiques: Approche statistique du problème [The clinical varieties of the acalculies in retrorolandic lesions: A statistical approach to the problem]. Revue Neurologique, 105, 85–103.
49.
Hofmeister, A. M. (1993). Elitism and reform in school mathematics. Remedial and Special Education, 14, (6), 8–13.
50.
Howell, R., Sidorenko, E., & Jurica, J. (1987). The effects of computer use on the acquisition of multiplication facts by a student with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 20, 336–341.
51.
Hutchinson, N. L. (1993a). Students with disabilities and mathematics education reform—Let the dialogue begin. Remedial and Special Education, 14, (6), 20–23.
52.
Hutchinson, N. L. (1993b). The effect of cognitive instruction on algebra problem solving of adolescents with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 16, 34–63.
53.
Johnson, D. C., Romberg, T. A., & Scandura, J. M. (1994). The origins of the JRME: A retrospective account. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 25, (6), 561–582.
54.
Johnston, W. B., & Packers, A. E. (1987). Workforce 2000: Work and workers for the twenty-first century.Indianapolis: Hudson Insitute.
55.
Jones, G. A., Thornton, C. A., & Toohey, M. A. (1985). A multiplication program for learning basic addition facts: Case studies and an experimental report. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 18, 319–325.
56.
Kane, B. J., & Alley, G. R. (1980). A peer tutored instructional management program in computational mathematics for incarcerated learning disabled juvenile delinquents. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 13, 39–42.
57.
Kelly, B., Carnine, D., Gersten, R., & Grossen, B. (1986). The effectiveness of videodisc instruction in teaching fractions to learning-disabled and remedial high school students. Journal of Special Education Technology, 8, (2), 5–17.
58.
Kelly, B., Gersten, R., & Carnine, D. (1990). Student error patterns as a function of curricular design: Teaching fractions to remedial high school students and high school students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 23, 23–29.
59.
Kieran, C. (1994). Doing and seeing things differently: A 25-year retrospective of mathematics education research on learning. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 25, 583–607.
60.
Kilpatrick, J. (1992). A history of research in mathematics education. In D. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook for research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 3–38). New York: Macmillan.
61.
Kosc, L. (1974). Developmental dyscalculia. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 7, 165–177.
62.
Koscinski, S. T., & Gast, D. L. (1993). Computer-assisted instruction with constant time delay to teach multiplication facts to students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 8, (3), 157–168.
63.
Leon, J. A., & Pepe, H. J. (1983). Selfinstructional training: Cognitive behavior modification for remediating arithmetic deficits. Exceptional Children, 50, 54–60.
64.
Lessen, E., Dudzinski, M., Karsh, K., & Van Acker, R. (1989). A survey of ten years of academic intervention research with learning disabled students: Implications for research and practice. Learning Disabilities Focus, 4, (2), 106–122.
65.
Lester, F. K., Jr. (1994). Musings about mathematical problem-solving research: 1970–1994. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 25, 660–675.
66.
Lester, F. K., Jr., & Garofalo, J. (Eds.). (1982). Mathematical problem solving: Issues in research.Philadelphia: Franklin Institute Press.
67.
Lindquist, M., Carpenter, T. P., Silver, E., & Mathews, W. (1983). The third national mathematics assessment: Results and implications for elementary and middle schools. The Arithmetic Teacher, 31, (4), 14–19.
68.
Lloyd, J., Saltzman, N. J., & Kauffman, J. M. (1981). Predictable generalization in academic learning as a result of preskills and strategy training. Learning Disability Quarterly, 4, 203–216.
69.
Luiselli, J. K., & Downing, J. N. (1980). Improving a student's arithmetic performance using feedback and reinforcement procedures. Education and Treatment of Children, 3, 45–49.
70.
Maheady, L., Sacca, M. K., & Harper, G. F. (1987). Classwide student tutoring teams: The effects of peer-mediated instruction on the academic performance of secondary mainstreamed students. The Journal of Special Education, 21, 107–121.
71.
Marzola, E. (1985). An arithmetic problem solving model based on a plan for steps to solution, mastery learning, and calculator use in a resource room setting for learning disabled students.New York: Columbia University Teachers College.
72.
Mastropieri, M. A., Scruggs, T. E., & Shiah, S. (1991). Mathematics instruction for learning disabled students: A review of research. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 6, 89–98.
73.
Mclntyre, S. B., Test, D. W., Cooke, N. L., & Beattie, J. (1991). Using count-bys to increase multiplication facts fluency. Learning Disability Quarterly, 14, 82–88.
74.
McKnight, C., Crosswhite, F., Dossey, J., Kifer, E., Swafford, J., Travers, K., & Cooney, T. (1987). The underachieving curriculum: Assessing U.S. school mathematics from an international perspective.Champaign, IL: Stipes.
75.
McLeod, T., & Armstrong, S. (1982). Learning disabilities in mathematics—Skill deficits and remedial approaches. Learning Disability Quarterly, 5, 305–311.
76.
McLoughlin, J. A., & Lewis, R. B. (1990). Assessing special students.New York: Macmillan.
77.
Mercer, C. D., Harris, C. A., & Miller, S. P. (1993). Reforming reforms in mathematics. Remedial and Special Education, 34, (6), 14–19.
78.
Mercer, C. D., & Miller, S. P. (1992). Teaching students with learning problems in math to acquire, understand, and apply basic math facts. Remedial and Special Education, 33, (3), 19–35, 61.
79.
Miller, S. P., & Mercer, C. D. (1993). Mnemonics: Enhancing the math performance of students with learning difficulties. Intervention in School and Clinic, 29, 78–82.
80.
Montague, M. (1992). The effects of cognitive and metacognitive strategy instruction on the mathematical problem solving of middle school students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 25, 230–248.
81.
Montague, M., & Applegate, B. (1993). Middle school students' mathematical problem solving: An analysis of think-aloud protocols. Learning Disability Quarterly, 16, 19–30.
82.
Montague, M., & Bos, C. S. (1986). The effect of cognitive strategy training on verbal math problem solving performance of learning disabled adolescents. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 19, 26–33.
83.
National Commission on Excellence in Education.A nation at risk: The imperative for education reform.Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
84.
National Council of Supervisors of Mathematics. (1988). Twelve components of essential mathematics.Minneapolis: Author.
85.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1980). An agenda for action.Reston, VA: Author.
86.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics.Reston, VA: Author.
87.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1991). Professional standards for teaching mathematics.Reston, VA: Author.
88.
National Research Council. (1989). Everybody counts—A report to the nation on the future of mathematics education.Washington, DC: National Academy.
89.
National Science Board Commission. (1983). Educating Americans for the 21st century.Washington, DC: National Science Foundation.
90.
Office of Technology Assessment. (1988). Technology and the American transition.Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
91.
Parmar, R. S. (1992). Protocol analysis of strategies used by students with mild disabilities when solving arithmetic word problems. Diagnostique, 17, (4), 227–243.
92.
Parmar, R. S., Cawley, J. F., & Frazita, R. R. (1996). Word problem-solving by students with and without mild disabilities. Exceptional Children, 62, 415–429.
93.
Peterson, S. K., Mercer, C. D., & O'Shea, L. (1988). Teaching learning disabled students place value using the concrete to abstract sequence. Learning Disabilities Research, 4, (1), 52–56.
94.
Phillips, N. B., Hamlett, C. L., Fuchs, L. S., & Fuchs, D. (1993). Combining classwide curriculum-based measurement and peer tutoring to help general educators provide adaptive education. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 8, (3), 148–156.
95.
Piaget, J. (1954). The construction of reality in the child (M. Cook, Trans.). New York: Basic Books.
96.
Piaget, J. (1963). Origins of intelligence in children.New York: Norton.
97.
Piaget, J. (1970). The science of education and the psychology of the child.New York: Orion.
98.
Poplin, M., Wiest, D., & Thorson, S. (1995). Alternative instructional strategies to reductionism: Constructive, multicultural, feminine and critical pedagogies. In W. Stainback & S. Stainback (Eds.), Controversial issues confronting special education: Divergent perspectives (2nd ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
99.
Reynolds, C. (1985). Measuring the aptitude–achievement discrepancy in learning disability diagnosis. Remedial and Special Education, 6, 37–55.
100.
Rivera, D. (1993). Examining mathematics reform and the implications for students with mathematical disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 14, (6), 24–27.
101.
Rivera, D. P., Carter, A., & Smith, R. (1996). The effects of computer-based instruction and fluency building techniques on the proficiency and accuracy of answering math facts by students with learning disabilities. Unpublished manuscript.
102.
Rivera, D., & Smith, D. D. (1987). Influence of modeling on acquisition and generalization of computational skills: A summary of research findings from three sites. Learning Disability Quarterly, 10, 69–80.
103.
Rivera, D., & Smith, D. D. (1988). Using a demonstration strategy to teach learning disabled midschool students how to compute long division. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 21, 77–81.
104.
Rivera, D. P., Taylor, R. L., & Bryant, B. R. (1994–95). A review of current trends in mathematics assessment for students with mild disabilities. Diagnostique, 20, 143–174.
105.
Scheid, K. (1990). Cognitive-based methods for teaching mathematics to students with learning problems.Columbus, OH: Information Center for Special Education Media and Materials.
106.
Schoenfeld, A. H. (1982). Some thoughts on problem-solving research and mathematics education. In F. K. Lester & J. Garofalo (Eds.), Mathematical problem solving: Issues in research (pp. 27–37). Philadelphia: Franklin Institute.
107.
Schoenfeld, A. H. (1985). Mathematical problem solving.Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
108.
Schoenfeld, A. H. (1994). A discourse on methods. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 25, 697–710.
109.
Schunk, D. H. (1985). Participation in goal setting: Effects on self-efficacy and skills of learning disabled children. The Journal of Special Education, 19, 307–317.
110.
Schunk, D. H., & Cox, P. D. (1986). Strategy training and attribution feedback with learning disabled students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 78, 201–209.
111.
Skemp, R. R. (1976). Relational understanding and instrumental understanding. Mathematics Teaching, 77, 20–26.
112.
Skinner, B. F. (1968). The technology of teaching.New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
113.
Slavin, R. E., Madden, N. A., & Leavey, M. (1984). Effects of team assisted individualization on the mathematics achievement of academically handicapped and nonhandicapped students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 813–819.
114.
Smith, D. D., & Lovitt, T. C. (1975). The use of modeling techniques to influence the acquisition of computational arithmetic skills in learning-disabled children. In E. Ramp & G. Semb (Eds.), Behavior analysis: Areas of research and application (pp. 283–308). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
115.
Smith, D. D., & Lovitt, T. C. (1976). The differential effects of reinforcement contingencies on arithmetic performance. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 9, 32–40.
116.
Suydam, M. N. (1980). Untangling clues from research on problem solving. In S. Krulik (Ed.), Problem solving in school mathematics (pp. 34–50). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
117.
Trifiletti, J. J., Frith, G. H., & Armstrong, S. (1984). Microcomputers versus resource rooms for LD students: A preliminary investigation of the effects on math skills. Learning Disability Quarterly, 7, 69–76.
118.
Twentieth Century Fund. (1983). Making the grade.New York: Author.
119.
Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
120.
Wagner, M. (1990). The school programs and school performance of secondary students classified as learning disabled: Findings from the National Longitudinal Transition Study of Special Education Students.Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.
121.
Wesson, C. L., & King. R. P. (1992). The role of curriculum-based measurement in portfolio assessment. Diagnostique, 18, (1), 27–37.
122.
Wittrock, M. C. (1974). A generative model of mathematics learning. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 5, 181–196.
123.
Woodward, J. (1991). Procedural knowledge in mathematics: The role of the curriculum. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 24, 242–251.
124.
Worthern, B. R. (1993). Critical issues that will determine the future of alternative assessment. Phi Delta Kappan, 74, 444–454.
125.
Zawaiza, T., & Gerber, M. (1993). Effects of explicit instruction on math word-problem solving by community college students with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 16, 64–79.