Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Relatively little is known about the characteristics of inner-city adults who seek assistance from literacy programs. Increased knowledge about this population will enhance the development of more effective programs, as well as policy options. This study describes the characteristics of 280 adults, ages 16 to 63, who came to an adult literacy program that focused on severe reading difficulties. The program, located within a hospital complex in a large, urban area, attracted these individuals through an extensive multimedia outreach effort. Results suggested that the adults who sought help were generally characterized by a vast array of cognitive, academic, and social difficulties. In addition, the extent of these difficulties increased dramatically as literacy level declined. These findings suggest that comprehensive educational, social, and vocational services may be needed to help adults with severe reading difficulties cope with the diverse and severe problems they face.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Angoff, W. H. (1971). Scales, norms, and equivalent scores. In R. L. Thorndike (Ed.), Educational measurement (2nd ed., pp. 508–600). Washington, DC: American Council on Education.

Bender, L. (1946). Visual motor gestalt test. New York: American Orthopsychiatric Association.

Brooker, B. H. , & Cyr, J. J. (1986). Tables for clinicians to use to convert WAIS-R short forms. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 42, 983–984.

Dorgan, C. A. (1995). Statistical record of health & medicine. Detroit, MI: Gale Research.

Gualtieri, T. , & Hicks, R. (1985). The immunoreactivity theory of selective male affliction. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 8, 427–470.

Jastak, S. , & Wilkinson, G. S. (1984). The wide range achievement test–Revised: Administration manual. Wilmington, DE: Jastak Associates.

Kirsch, I. , Jungeblut, A. , Jenkins, L. , & Kolstad, A. (1993). Adult literacy in America. Washington, DC: Office of Educational Research and Improvement, U.S. Office of Education.

Roswell, R. , & Chall, J. (1963). Roswell-Chall auditory blending test. La Jolla, CA: Essay Press.

Roswell, F. , & Chall, J. (1978). Roswell-Chall diagnostic reading test of word analysis skills. La Jolla, CA: Essay Press.

10.

Stanovich, K. E. (1993). The construct validity of discrepancy definitions of reading disability. In G. R. Lyon , D. B. Gray , J. F. Kavanagh , & N. A. Krasnegor (Eds.), Better understanding learning disabilities (pp. 273–307). Baltimore: Brookes.

11.

Torgesen, J. K. (1993). Variations on theory in learning disabilities. In G. R. Lyon , D. B. Gray , J. F. Kavanagh , & N. A. Krasnegor (Eds.), Better understanding learning disabilities (pp. 153–170). Baltimore: Brookes.

12.

U.S. Bureau of the Census. (1994). Statistical abstract of the United States (114th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.

13.

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (1991). International classification of diseases: Ninth revision, clinical modification. Washington, DC: Author.

14.

U.S. Department of Labor. (1991). Dictionary of occupational titles (4th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.

15.

Wechsler, D. (1981). Wechsler adult intelligence scale–Revised. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corp.

16.

Woodcock, R. W. , & Johnson, M. B. (1989). Woodcock-Johnson psycho-educational battery–Revised. Allen, TX: DLM Teaching Resources.

Inner-City Adults with Severe Reading Difficulties

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References