This article is one in our Special International Perspectives on Learning Disabilities series. The author attempts to present the actual contextual picture of the learning disabilities (LD) field in Portugal, where the school failure rate in public schools is approximately 37% and 29% in primary and secondary systems, respectively. The need for a clear educational and legislative definition of LD is advanced, as well as some expectations for that national problem. A critical analysis of the assessment and treatment models is given, as well as some suggestions for and challenges to the role of schools and personnel training centers. Research priorities also are taken into account.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bos, C., & Vaughn, S. (1988). Strategies for teaching students with learning and behavior problems. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
2.
Cruickshank, W. (1985). Concepts in special education: Learning disabilities. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University.
3.
da Fonseca, V. (1987). Uma introducão es dificuldades de aprendizagem. Lisboa: Editorial Notócias.
4.
da Fonseca, V. (1989). Educacão especial. Lisboa: Editorial Notócias.
5.
Deno, S. L. (1985). Curriculum-based measurement: The emerging alternative. Exceptional Children, 52, 219–232.
6.
Feuerstein, R., Rand, Y., & Hoffman, M. B. (1979). Cognitive modifiability in retarded adolescents: Effects of instrumental enrichment. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 83, 539–550.
7.
Johnson, D. (1990). Assessment issues in LD research. In S. Vaughn & C. Bos (Eds.), Research in LD (pp. 141–149). Boston: College-Hill.
8.
Keogh, B. (1986). Future of the LD field: Research and practice. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 19, 455–460.
9.
Kirk, S. (1987). Educating exceptional children. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
10.
McGrady, H. (1980). Communication disorders and specific learning disabilities. In J. van Hattum (Ed.), Communication disorders: An introduction (pp. 509–561). New York: Macmillan.
11.
Mercer, C. (1990). Beyond traditional assessment. In S. Vaughn & C. Bos (Eds.), Research in LD (pp. 153–165). Boston: College-Hill.
12.
Myklebust, H. (1968). Progress in learning disabilities. New York: Grune & Stratton.
13.
Myklebust, H. (1978). Progress in learning disabilities (2nd ed.). New York: Grune & Stratton.
14.
National Joint Committee on Learning Disabilities. (1994). Collective perspectives on issues affecting learning disabilities. Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
15.
PIPSE. (1989). Programa interministerial de promocão do sucesso educativo. Lisboa: Ministerio de Educacão.
16.
Senf, G. M. (1981). Issues surrounding the diagnosis of LD. In T. Kratochwill (Ed.), Advances in school psychology (pp. 88–131). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
17.
Senf, G. M. (1990). LD as sociologic sponge: Wiping up life's spills. In S. Vaughn & C. Bos (Eds.), Research in LD (pp. 87–96). Boston: College-Hill.
18.
Torgesen, J. K. (1990). Thinking about the future by distinguishing between issues that have resolutions and those that do not. In S. Vaughn & C. Bos (Eds.), Research in LD (pp. 55–64). Boston: College-Hill.
19.
Warnock Report. (1978). Special education needs. London: Her Majesty's Stationary Office.
20.
Ysseldyke, J. E., & Algozzine, B. (1983). LD or not LD: That's not the question!Journal of Learning Disabilities, 16, 29–31.
