Past, present, and future concerns regarding the definition of learning disabilities (LD) are documented. Research on efforts to clarify the LD label is discussed, with a focus on the questionable utility of the discrepancy model. Finally, an approach to operationalizing the NJCLD definition of LD is presented and applied.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Adelman, H. S. (1989). Toward solving the problems of misidentification and limited intervention efficacy. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 22, 609–612.
2.
Adelman, H. S. (1992). LD: The next 25 years. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 25, 17–22.
3.
A guide to Section 504: How it applies to students with learning disabilities and ADD. (1995, March/April). LDA Newsbriefs, 30(1), 14–15.
4.
Algozzine, B., & Ysseldyke, J. E. (1987). Questioning discrepancies: Retaking the first step 20 years later. Learning Disability Quarterly, 10, 301–312.
5.
Algozzine, B., Ysseldyke, J. E., & Shinn, M. E. (1982). Identifying children with learning disabilities: When is a discrepancy severe?Journal of School Psychology, 20, 299–305.
6.
Ariel, A. (1992). Education of children and adolescents with learning disabilities.New York: Macmillan.
7.
Brinckerhoff, L. C., Shaw, S. F., & McGuire, J. M. (1993). Promoting postsecondary education for students with learning disabilities: A handbook for practitioners. Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
8.
Chalfant, J. C. (1989). Diagnostic criteria for entry and exit from service: A national problem. In L. B. Silver (Ed.), The assessment of learning disabilities: Preschool through adulthood (pp. 1–25). Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
9.
Children's Defense Fund. (1994). The state of America's children, 1994.Washington, DC: Author.
10.
Deshler, D. D., Schumaker, J. B., Lenz, B. K., & Ellis, E. (1984). Academic and cognitive interventions with LD adolescents: Part II. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 17, 170–179.
11.
Doris, J. L. (1993). Defining learning disabilities: A history of the search for consensus. In G. R. Lyon, D. B. Gray, J. F. Kavanaugh, & N. A. Krasnegor (Eds.), Better understanding learning disabilities: New views from research and their implications for education and public policies (pp. 97–115). Baltimore: Brookes.
12.
Dowdy, C. A., Smith, T. E. C., & Nowell, C. H. (1992). Learning disabilities and vocational rehabilitation. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 25, 442–447.
13.
Epps, S., & Tindal, G. (1987). The effectiveness of differential programming in serving mildly handicapped students: Placement options and transitional programming. In M. C. Wang, M. C. Reynolds, & H. J. Walberg (Eds.), The handbook of special education: Research and practice (Vol. 1, pp. 213–248). Oxford, England: Pergamon.
14.
Felton, R. H., & Brown, I. S. (1991). Neuropsychological prediction of reading disabilities. In J. E. Obrzut & G. W. Hynd (Eds.), Neuropsychological foundations of learning disabilities: A handbook of issues, methods, and practice (pp. 387–410). San Diego: Academic Press.
15.
Finlan, T. G. (1992). Do state methods of quantifying a severe discrepancy result in fewer students with learning disabilities?Learning Disability Quarterly, 15, 129–134.
16.
Frankenberger, W., & Fronzaglio, K. (1991). A review of states' criteria and procedures for identifying children with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 24, 495–500.
17.
Gallagher, J. (1986). Learning disabilities and special education: A critique. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 19, 595–601.
18.
Gallagher, J. J. (1987). Public policy and the malleability of children. In J. Gallagher & C. Ramey (Eds.), The malleability of children (pp. 199–208). Baltimore: Brookes.
19.
Hallahan, D. P., & Reeve, R. E. (1980). Selective attention and distractibility. In B. K. Keogh (Ed.), Advances in special education (Vol. 1, pp. 141–181). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
20.
Hammill, D. D. (1990). On defining learning disabilities: An emerging consensus. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 23, 74–84.
21.
Hammill, D. D. (1993). A timely definition of learning disabilities. Family and Community Health, 16(3), 1–8.
22.
Hynd, G. W., Marshall, R., & Gonzales, J. (1991). Learning disabilities and presumed central nervous system dysfunction. Learning Disability Quarterly, 14, 283–296.
23.
Kauffman, J. M. (1989). The Regular Education Initiative as Reagan-Bush education policy: A trickle-down theory of education of the hard to teach. The Journal of Special Education, 23, 256–278.
24.
Kavale, K. A. (1987). Theoretical issues surrounding severe discrepancy. Learning Disabilities Research, 3, 12–20.
25.
Kavale, K. A., & Forness, S. R. (1985). The science of learning disabilities.San Diego, CA: College-Hill.
26.
Kavale, K. A., Forness, S. R., & Lorsbach, T. C. (1991). Definition for definitions of learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 14, 257–268.
27.
Keogh, B. K. (1987). Learning disabilities: In defense of a construct. Learning Disabilities Research, 3, 4–9.
28.
Keogh, B. K. (1988). Improving services for problem learners: Rethinking and restructuring. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 21, 19–22.
29.
Kirk, S. A. (1986). Educating exceptional children.Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
30.
Kirk, S. A., & Chalfant, J. C. (1984). Academic and developmental learning disabilities.Denver: Love.
31.
Kolligian, J., & Sternberg, R. (1987). Intelligence, information processing, and specific learning disabilities: A triarchic synthesis. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 20, 8–17.
32.
Levine, M. D. (1989). Learning disabilities at 25: The early adulthood of a maturing concept. Learning Disabilities: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 1, 1–11.
33.
Levine, M. D. (1991). The learning dis-labelled child. Teaching Exceptional Children, 23(4), 15.
34.
Levine, M. D., Hooper, S., Montgomery, J., Reed, M., Sandler, A., Schwartz, C., & Watson, T. (1993). Learning disabilities: An interactive developmental paradigm. In G. R. Lyon, D. B. Gray, J. F. Kavanaugh, & N. A. Krasnegor (Eds.), Better understanding learning disabilities: New views from research and their implications for education and public policies (pp. 229–250). Baltimore: Brookes.
35.
Lieberman, L. M. (1992). Preserving special education. for those who need it. In W. Stainback & S. Stainback (Eds.), Controversial issues confronting special education (pp. 13–25). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
36.
Macmann, G. M., Barnett, D. W., Lombard, T. J., Belton-Kocher, E., & Sharpe, M. N. (1989). On the actuarial classification of children: Fundamental studies of classification agreement. The Journal of Special Education, 23, 127–149.
37.
Mather, N., & Healey, W. C. (1990). Deposing aptitude-achievement discrepancy as the imperial criterion for learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 1, 40–48.
38.
Mather, N., & Roberts, R. (1994). Learning disabilities: A field in danger of extinction. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 9, 49–58.
39.
Meltzer, L. (1994). Assessment of learning disabilities: The challenge of evaluating the cognitive strategies and processes underlying learning. In G. R. Lyon (Ed.), Frames of reference for the assessment of learning disabilities: New views on measurement issues (pp. 571–606). Baltimore: Brookes.
40.
Morsink, C. V., Thomas, C. C., & Smith-Davis, J. (1987). Noncategorical special education programs: Process and outcomes. In M. C. Wang, M. C. Reynolds, & H. J. Walberg (Eds.), The handbook of special education: Research and practice (Vol. 1, pp. 287–340). Oxford, England: Pergamon.
41.
Newman, A. P. (1994). Adult literacy programs: An overview. Learning Disabilities: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 5, 51–61.
42.
Olson, R., Forsberg, H., Wise, B., & Rack, J. (1994). Measurement in word recognition, orthographic, and phonological skills. In G. R. Lyon (Ed.), Frames of reference for the assessment of learning disabilities: New views on measurement issues (pp. 243–278). Baltimore: Brookes.
43.
Price, L. (1993). Psychosocial characteristics and issues of adults with learning disabilities. In L. Brinckerhoff, S. Shaw, & J. McGuire (Eds.), Promoting postsecondary education for students with learning disabilities: A handbook for practitioners (pp. 137–167). Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
44.
Reschly, D. J. (1988). Special education reform: School psychology revolution. School Psychology Review, 17, 459–475.
45.
Reynolds, M. C., Wang, M. C., & Walberg, H. J. (1987). The necessary restructuring of special and regular education. Exceptional Children, 53, 391–398.
46.
Sattler, J. M. (1988). Assessment of children (3rd ed.). San Diego: Author.
47.
Semmel, M. I. (1986). Special education in the year 2000 and beyond: A proposed action agenda for addressing selected issues. Proceedings of the CEC Invitational Symposium on the Future of Special Education, Council for Exceptional Children, Reston, VA.
48.
Sobel, M., & Keleman, E. (1984). On an application of statistical ranking and selection tables to the identification of the learning disabled. Journal of Educational Statistics, 9, 215–226.
49.
Stainback, W., & Stainback, S. (1984). A rationale for the merger of special and regular education. Exceptional Children, 51, 102–111.
50.
Stanovich, K. E. (1991a). Conceptual and empirical problems with discrepancy definitions of reading disability. Learning Disability Quarterly, 14, 269–280.
51.
Stanovich, K. (1991b). Discrepancy definitions of reading disability: Has intelligence led us astray?Reading Research Quarterly, 26, 7–29.
52.
Sternberg, R. J. (1987). A unified theory of intellectual exceptionality. In J. D. Day & J. G. Borkowski (Eds.), Intelligence and exceptionality: New directions for theory, assessment, and instructional practices (pp. 135–172). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
53.
Swanson, H. L. (1987). Information processing and learning disabilities: An overview. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 20, 3–7.
54.
Swanson, H. L. (1988). Toward a metatheory of learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 21, 196–209.
55.
Swanson, H. L., (1991a). Operational definitions and learning disabilities [special issue]. Learning Disability Quarterly, 14(4).
56.
Swanson, H. L. (1991b). Operational definitions and learning disabilities: An overview. Learning Disability Quarterly, 14, 242–254.
57.
Swanson, H. L. (1993). Learning disabilities from the perspective of cognitive psychology. In G. R. Lyon, D. B. Gray, J. F. Kavanaugh, & N. A. Krasnegor (Eds.), Better understanding learning disabilities: New views from research and their implications for education and public policies (pp. 199–228). Baltimore: Brookes.
58.
Swanson, H. L., & Christie, L. (1994). Implicit notions of learning disabilities: Some directions for definitions. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 9, 244–254.
59.
Swanson, H. L., & Cooney, J. B. (1991). Learning disabilities and memory. In B. Y. L. Wong (Ed.), Learning about learning disabilities (pp. 103–127). San Diego: Academic Press.
60.
Swanson, H. L., & Watson, B. (1982). Educational and psychological assessment of exceptional children.Saint Louis, MO: Mosby.
61.
Torgesen, J. K. (1982). The learning disabled child as an inactive learner: Educational implications. Topics in Learning Disabilities, 2, 45–52.
62.
Torgesen, J. K. (1992). Learning disabilities: Historical and conceptual issues. In B. Y. L. Wong (Ed.), Learning about learning disabilities (pp. 3–38). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
63.
Torgesen, J. K. (1993). Variations on theory in learning disabilities. In G. R. Lyon, D. B. Gray, J. F. Kavanaugh, & N. A. Krasnegor (Eds.), Better understanding learning disabilities: New views from research and their implications for education and public policies (pp. 153–170). Baltimore: Brookes.
64.
Tucker, J., Stevens, L. J., & Ysseldyke, J. E. (1983). Learning disabilities: The experts speak out. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 16, 6–14.
65.
U. S. Department of Education. (1977). Definition and criteria for defining students as learning disabled. Federal Register, 42(250), 65083.
66.
Valdés, K. A., Williamson, C. L., & Wagner, M. M. (1990). The national longitudinal transition study of special education students: Statistical almanac (Vol. 2). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education Programs.
67.
Vellutino, F. R., Scanlon, D. M., & Tanzman, M. S. (1994). Components of reading ability: Issues and problems in operationalizing word identification, phonological coding, and orthographic coding. In G. R. Lyon (Ed.), Frames of reference for the assessment of learning disabilities: New views on measurement issues (pp. 279–332). Baltimore: Brookes.
68.
Wong, B. Y. L. (1991). Learning about learning disabilities.San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
69.
Woodcock, R. W., & Johnson, M. B. (1989). Woodcock-Johnson psycho-educational battery-Revised.Allen, TX: DLM Teaching Resources.
70.
Zigmond, N. (1993). Learning disabilities from an educational perspective. In G. R. Lyon, D. B. Gray, J. F. Kavanaugh, & N. A. Krasnegor (Eds.), Better understanding learning disabilities: New views from research and their implications for education and public policies (pp. 251–272). Baltimore: Brookes.
