This study reports follow-up data from 24 teenagers (mean age = 17 years; 11 boys and 13 girls) who had participated in a study of phonological analysis and reading and spelling abilities 11 years earlier, when they were enrolled in kindergarten. The results indicated that phonological awareness ability assessed during kindergarten (via the Auditory Analysis Test) was a significant predictor of word identification and spelling skills 11 years later, when both socioeconomic status and vocabulary development were controlled. In contrast, socioeconomic status, vocabulary development, word recognition, and spelling achievement assessed at kindergarten were not significantly correlated with reading and spelling achievement 11 years later. Results are discussed regarding the relative stability of phonological awareness and the importance of this awareness as a precursor to the development of word identification and spelling skills.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Adams, M. J. (1991). Beginning to read: Thinking and learning about print.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
2.
Blachman, B. A. (1994). What we have learned from longitudinal studies of phonological processing and reading, and some unanswered questions: A response to Torgesen, Wagner, and Rashotte. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 27, 287–291.
3.
Blishen, B. B., Carroll, W. K., & Moore, C. (1987). The 1981 socioeconomic index for occupations in Canada. Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology, 24, 465–487.
4.
Bradley, L., & Bryant, P. E. (1983). Categorizing sounds and learning to read–-A causal connection. Nature, 301, 419–421.
5.
Dunn, L. M. (1959). Peabody picture vocabulary test.Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
6.
Dunn, L. M., & Dunn, L. M. (1981). Peabody picture vocabulary test-Revised.Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
7.
Jastak, J. F., & Jastak, S. (1978). Wide range achievement test.Wilmington, DE: Jastak Associates.
8.
Jastak, S., & Wilkinson, G. S. (1984). Wide range achievement test-Revised.Wilmington, DE: Jastak Associates.
9.
Lovett, M. W., Ransby, M. J., Hardwick, N., Johns, M. S., & Donaldson, S. A. (1991). Can dyslexia be treated? Treatment-specific and generalized treatment effects in dyslexic children's response to remediation. Brain and Language, 37, 90–121.
10.
Lundberg, I., Olofsson, A., & Wall, S. (1980). Reading and spelling skills in the first school years predicted from phonemic awareness skills in kindergarten. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 21, 159–173.
11.
MacDonald, G. W. (1980, June). The effectiveness of the Auditory Analysis Test in predicting performance on the WRAT Reading and Spelling subtests. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Neuropsychological Society, ChianclanoTerme, Italy.
12.
MacDonald, G. W., & Gates, R. D. (1983, June). Phonemic segmentation ability in beginning readers. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Neuropsychological Society, Lisbon, Portugal.
13.
Rosner, J. (1975). Helping children overcome learning difficulties.New York: Walker and Co.
14.
Rosner, J., & Simon, D. P. (1971). The Auditory Analysis Test: An initial report. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 4, 384–392.
15.
Snowling, M. J. (1991). Developmental reading disorders. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 32, 49–77.
16.
Stanovich, K. E. (1986). Cognitive processes and the reading problems of the learning disabled: Evaluating the assumption of specificity. In J. K. Torgesen & B. Y. L. Wong (Eds.), Psychological and educational perspectives on learning disabilities (pp. 85–131). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
17.
Strickland, D., & Cullinan, B. (1991). Afterword. In M.J. Adams (Ed.), Beginning to read: Thinking and learning about print (pp. 425–434). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
18.
Torgesen, J. K., Wagner, R. K., & Rashotte, C. (1994). Longitudinal studies of phonological processing and reading. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 27, 276–286.
19.
Tunmer, W. E., Herriman, M. L., & Nesdale, A. R. (1988). Metalinguistic abilities and beginning reading. Reading Research Quarterly, 23, 134–158.
20.
Vellutino, F. R., & Scanlon, D. M. (1987). Phonological coding, phonological awareness, and reading ability: Evidence from a longitudinal and experimental study. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 33, 321–363.
21.
Vellutino, F. R., Scanlon, D. M., & Tanzman, M. S. (1994). Components of reading ability: Issues and problems in operationalizing word identification, phonological coding, and orthographic coding. In G. R. Lyon (Ed.), Frames of reference for the assessment of learning disabilities (pp. 279–332). Baltimore: Brookes.
22.
Wagner, R. K., & Torgesen, J. K. (1987). The nature of phonological processing and its causal role in the acquisition of reading skills. Psychological Bulletin, 101, 192–212.
23.
Woodcock, R. W. (1987). Woodcock reading mastery tests-Revised.Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
