The exploratory research reported in this article was designed to determine the processes and outcomes of planning thematic literacy instruction in a holistic and contextualized manner. The work was conducted in an upper-elementary, self-contained setting for students identified as learning disabled. Specifically, the instructional activities included (a) interactive readings from literature on friendship, (b) personal written responses to the literature, (c) supported retellings of the literature, (d) performance related to the literature, and (e) journal writing on the topic of friendship. The outcomes are reported in terms of the use of intertextuality over the course of the 6-week unit, the emergence of theme as a salient feature in literature, and a change in the children's conceptions of friendship. More specific literacy outcomes are captured in case studies of 3 children.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Allington, R. L., & McGill-Franzen, A. (1989). School response to reading failure: Instruction for Chapter I and special education students in grades two, four, and eight. Elementary School Journal, 89, 529–542.
2.
Bigelow, B. J., & LaGaipa, J. J. (1980). The development of friendship values and choices. In H. C. Foot, A. J. Chapman, & J. R. Smith (Eds.), Friendship and social relations in children (pp. 15–44). New York: Wiley.
3.
Cosgrove, S. (1982). Morgan and Yew.Los Angeles: Price-Stern-Sloan.
4.
Dimino, J., Gersten, R., Carnine, D., & Blake, G. (1990). Story grammar: An approach for promoting at-risk secondary students' comprehension of literature. Elementary School Journal, 91, 19–32.
5.
El'konin, D. B. (1972). Toward the problem of stages in the mental development of the child. Soviet Psychology, 4, 225–251.
6.
Englert, C. S., & Palinesar, A. S. (1991). Reconsidering instructional research in literacy from a sociocultural perspective. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 6, 225–229.
7.
Englert, C. S., Raphael, T. E., & Anderson, L. M. (1988). Students' metacognitive knowledge about informational texts. Learning Disability Quarterly, 11, 18–46.
8.
Furman, W., & Bierman, K. L. (1984). Childrens' conceptions of friendship: A multimethod study of developmental changes. Developmental Psychology, 20, 925–931.
9.
Golenbock, P. (1992). Teammates.New York: Macmillan.
10.
Graham, S., & Harris, K. (1992). Teaching writing strategies to students with learning disorders: Issues and recommendations. In L. Meltzer (Ed.), Cognitive, linguistic, and developmental perspectives on learning disorders.Boston: College-Hill.
11.
Guerney, D., Gersten, R., Dimino, J., & Carnine, D. (1990). Story grammar: Effective literature instruction for high school students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 23, 335–343.
12.
Hartman, D. K. (1991). The intertextual links of readers using multiple passages: A postmodern/semiotic/cognitive view of meaning making. In J. Zutell & S. McCormick (Eds.), Learner factors/teacher factors: Issues in literacy research and instruction (pp. 49–66, 40th Yearbook of the National Reading Conference).
13.
Havill, J. (1990). Jamaica tag-along.Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.
14.
Leont'ev, A. N. (1932). Studies on the cultural development of the child. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 40, 52–83.
Lipson, M. Y., Valencia, S. W., Wixson, K. K., & Peters, C. W. (1993). Integration and thematic teaching: Integration to improve teaching and learning. Language Arts, 70, 252–263.
17.
Luria, A. R. (1976). Cognitive development: Its cultural and social foundations.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
18.
Needels, M. C., & Knapp, M. S. (1994). Teaching writing to children who are underserved. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 339–349.
19.
Norton, D. E. (1991). Through the eyes of a child.New York: Macmillan.
20.
Perkins, D. N. (1989). Selecting fertile themes for integrated learning. In H. H. Jacobs (Ed.), Interdisciplinary curriculum: Design and implementation (pp. 27–39). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Design.
21.
Poplin, M. S. (1988). The reductionist fallacy in learning disabilities: Replicating the past by reducing the present. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 21, 389–400.
22.
Resch, B. (1991). A place for everyone.Benicia, CA: Atomium Books.
23.
Rueda, R. (1990). Assisted performance in writing instruction with learning disabled students. In L. Moll (Ed.), Vygotsky and education: Instructional implications and applications of sociohistorical psychology (pp. 403–426). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
24.
Sadler, M. (1992). Elizabeth and Larry.New York: Simon and Schuster.
25.
Smollar, J., & Youniss, J. (1982). Social development through friendship. In K. H. Rubin & H. S. Ross (Eds.), Peer relationships and social skills in childhood (pp. 279–298). New York: Springer-Verlag.
26.
Steig, W. (1990). Amos and Boris.New York: Ferrar-Strauss-Giroux.
27.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
28.
Williams, J. P., Brown, L. G., Silverstein, A. K., & de Cani, J. S. (in press). An instructional program in comprehension of narrative themes for adolescents with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly.
29.
Youniss, J., & Volpe, J. (1978). A relational analysis of children's friendship. In W. Damon (Ed.), Social cognition (pp. 1–22). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
