Over the last several years, the field of learning disabilities has directed considerable attention toward the area of technology. However, there have been few discussions regarding the larger ethical implications that surround the use of technology with persons with learning disabilities. This article employs the fundamental ethical principles of beneficence, justice, and autonomy as a framework from which to reflect upon the use of technology with persons with learning disabilities to help ensure that the greatest possible rewards will be gained, while simultaneously minimizing any potential negative consequences. These principles are applied to a number of topics, including instructional/remedial, assistive, and diagnostic technology; technology and special abilities; social/psychological impact of technology; health-related concerns; technological access; and medical technologies.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Adelman, H. S., & Taylor, L. (1983). Learning disabilities in perspective.Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.
2.
Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, P.L. 101--336, 42 U.S.C.A. 12, 101--12, 213 (West Supp. 1991).
3.
Barbour, I. (1993). Ethics in an age of technology: The Gifford lectures (Vol. 2). San Francisco: Harper.
4.
Beauchamp, T. L. (1991). Philosophical ethics: An introduction to moral philosophy (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
5.
Beauchamp, T. L., & Walters, L. (1989). Contemporary issues in bioethics (3rd ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
6.
Berkow, R. (1992). The Merck manual of diagnosis and therapy (16th ed.). Rathway, NJ: Merck & Co.
7.
Bigler, E. D. (1992). The neurobiology and neuropsychology of adult learning disorders. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 25, 499–506.
8.
Brundin, P., Odin, P., & Widner, H. (1990). Promising new results with transplantation of nerve cells to the brain in Parkinson disease. Lakartidningen, 87, 3761–3763.
9.
Bryan, T. (1974). Peer popularity of learning disabled children. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 7, 261–268.
10.
Bryan, T. (1982). Social skills of learning disabled children and youth: An overview. Learning Disability Quarterly, 5, 322–333.
11.
Charney, D., Reder, L., & Kusbit, G. W. (1990). Goal setting and procedure selection in acquiring computer skills: A comparison of tutorials, problem solving, and learner exploration. Cognition and Instruction, 7, 323–342.
12.
Clouser, K. D. (1989). Bioethics. In T. L. Beauchamp & L. Walters (Eds.), Contemporary issues in bioethics (pp. 54–64). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
13.
Collins, T. (1990). The impact of microcomputer word processing on the performance of learning disabled students in a required first year writing course. Computers and Composition, 8, 49–68.
14.
Council for Exceptional Children, Division for Children with Learning Disabilities. (1978). Code of ethics and competencies for teachers of learning disabled children and youth.Kansas City, KS: Author.
15.
Council for Exceptional Children. (1983). Code of ethics and standards for professional practice. Exceptional Children, 50, 8–12.
16.
Dudley-Marling, C., & Edmiaston, R. (1985). Social status of learning disabled children and adolescents: A review. Learning Disability Quarterly, 8, 189–204.
17.
Ellis, E. S., & Sabornie, E. J. (1988). Effective instruction with microcomputers: Promises, practices and preliminary findings. In E. L. Meyer, G. A. Vergason, & R. J. Whelans (Eds.), Effective instructional strategies for exceptional children (pp. 355–379). Denver: Love.
18.
Fifield, M. B. (1989). Psychoeducational testing and the personal computer. Journal of Special Education Technology, 9, 136–143.
19.
Flowers, D. L. (1993). Brain basis for dyslexia: A summary of work in progress. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 26, 575–582.
20.
Galaburda, A. M. (1989). Ordinary and extraordinary brain development: Anatomical variation in developmental dyslexia. Annals of Dyslexia, 39, 67–80.
21.
Geschwind, N. (1982). Why Orton was right. Annals of Dyslexia, 32, 13–30.
22.
Grant, A. H. (1992). Factors influencing hand/eye synchronicity in the computer age. Optometry and Vision Science, 69, 739–744.
23.
Gresham, F. M., & Reschly, D. J. (1986). Social skill deficits and low peer acceptance of mainstreamed learning disabled children. Learning Disability Quarterly, 9, 23–32.
24.
Heavey, C. L., Adelman, H. S., Nelson, P., & Smith, D. C. (1989). Learning problems, anger, perceived control, and misbehavior. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 22, 46–50.
25.
Heshusius, L. (1989). The Newtonian mechanistic paradigm, special education, and contours of alternatives: An overview. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 22, 403–415.
26.
Heshusius, L. (1991). Future perspectives. In D. K. Reid, W. P. Hresko, & L. Swanson (Eds.), A cognitive approach to learning disabilities (pp. 431–467). Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
27.
Hresko, W. P., & Parmar, R. S. (1991a). Educational trends in learning disabilities. In D. K. Reid, W. P. Hresko, & L. Swanson (Eds.), A cognitive approach to learning disabilities (pp. 45–68). Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
28.
Hresko, W. P., & Parmar, R. S. (1991b). The educational perspective. In D. K. Reid, W. P. Hresko, & L. Swanson (Eds.), A cognitive approach to learning disabilities (pp. 3–44). Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
29.
Humphreys, P., Kaufman, W. E., & Galaburda, A. M. (1990). Developmental dyslexia in women: Neuropathological findings in three patients. Annals of Neurology, 28, 727–738.
30.
Hynd, G. W., Marshall, R., & Gonzalez, J. (1991). Learning disabilities and presumed central nervous system dysfunction. Learning Disability Quarterly, 14, 283–296.
31.
Individuals with Disabilities Act of 1990, P.L. 101--476, (1993).
32.
Kroemer, K. H. E. (1993, October). Locating the computer screen: How high, how far?Ergonomics and Design, pp. 7–8.
33.
Larsen, S. (1978). Learning disabilities and the professional educator. Learning Disability Quarterly, 1, 5–12.
34.
Lenz, B. K., & Deshler, D. D. (1994). Ethical issues related to translating research in learning disabilities into practice. In S. Vaughn & C. Bos (Eds.), Research issues in learning disabilities: Theory, methodology, assessment, and ethics (pp. 329–347). New York: Springer-Verlag.
35.
Lewis, R. B. (1993). Special education technology: Classroom applications.Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
36.
Lewis, R. B., Dell, S. J., Lynch, E. W., Harrison, P. J., & Saba, F. (1987). Special education technology in action: Teachers speak out.San Diego, CA: San Diego State University, Department of Special Education.
37.
London, S. J., Thomas, D. C., Bowman, J. D., Sobel, E., Cheng, T. C., & Peters, J. M. (1991). Exposure to electric and magnetic fields and risk of childhood leukemia. American Journal of Epidemiology, 9, 923–940.
38.
Maddux, C. D., Johnson, D. L., & Willis, J. W. (1992). Educational computing.Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
39.
Margalit, M. (1990). Effective technology integration for disabled children: The family perspective.New York: Springer-Verlag.
40.
Margalit, M., & Zak, I. (1984). Anxiety and self-concept of learning disabled children. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 17, 537–539.
41.
National Council on Disability. (1993). Study on the financing of assistive technology devices and services for individuals with disabilities: A report to the President and the Congress of the United States.Washington, DC: Author.
42.
Okolo, C. M., Barh, C. M., & Rieth, H. J. (1993). A retrospective view of computer-based instruction. Journal of Special Education Technology, 12, 1–27.
43.
Olson, R., Wise, B., Conners, F., Rack, J., & Fulker, D. (1989). Specific deficits in component reading and language skills: Genetic and environmental influences. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 22, 339–348.
44.
Omura, Y., & Losco, M. (1993). Electromagnetic fields in the home environment. Acupuncture and Electro-Therapeutics Research, 18, 33–74.
45.
The Panchatantra. (1970). Book V, “Ill-considered action” (A. W. Ryder, Trans.). Bombay: Jaico.
46.
Pennington, B. F., Gilger, J. W., Pauls, D., Smith, S. A., Smith, S. D., & DeFries, J. C. (1991). Evidence for major gene transmission of developmental dyslexia. Journal of the American Medical Association, 266, 1527–1534.
47.
Penso, R. A. (1991). A survey of factors associated with student computer use in resource specialist programs. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Pepperdine University, Los Angeles.
48.
Poplin, M. (1988a). The reductionist fallacy in learning disabilities: Replicating the past by reducing the present. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 21, 389–400.
49.
Poplin, M. (1988b). Holistic/constructivist principle of the teaching/learning process: Implications for the field of learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 21, 401–416.
50.
Poplin, M. (1995). The dialectic nature of technology and holism: The use of technology for the liberation of the learning disabled. Learning Disability Quarterly, 18, 129–140.
51.
Raskind, M. H. (1993). Assistive technology and adults with learning disabilities: A blueprint for exploration and advancement. Learning Disability Quarterly, 16, 185–198.
52.
Raskind, M. H. (1994). Assistive technology for adults with learning disabilities: A rationale for use. In P. J. Gerber & H. B. Reiff (Eds.), Learning disabilities in adulthood: Persisting problems and evolving issues.Stonem, MA: Andover Medical.
53.
Raskind, M. H., & Higgins, E. (1995). The effects of speech synthesis on the proofreading efficiency of postsecondary students with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 18, 141–158.
54.
Raskind, M. H., & Scott, N. (1993). Technology for postsecondary students with learning disabilities. In S. A. Vogel & P. Adelman (Eds.), Success for postsecondary students with learning disabilities (pp. 240–279). New York: Springer-Verlag.
55.
Rehabilitation Act of 1973, P.L. 92--112, 29 U.S.C. 794 (1980).
56.
Reid, D. K., & Hresko, W. P. (1981). A cognitive approach to learning disabilities.Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
57.
Russell, S. J., Corwin, R., Mokros, J. R., & Kapisovsky, P. M. (1989). Beyond drill and practice: Expanding the computer mainstream.Reston, VA: The Council for Exceptional Children.
58.
Ryder, A. W. (1970). Ill-considered action. In Panchatantra (Book 5). Bombay: Jaico Publishing House. (Translated from the Sanskrit)
59.
Schmaus, D. C. (1990). The risk of carpal tunnel syndrome with computer use. AORN Journal, 52, 383–384.
60.
Sheedy, J. E. (1992). Vision problems at video display terminals: A survey of optometrists. Journal of the American Optometric Association, 63, 687–692.
61.
Smith, D. S. (1987, February). My struggles and triumphs: Dyslexia or “plus-lexia”? Paper presented at the California State University of Northridge Third Annual Conference on the Learning Disabled Adult, Northridge, CA.
62.
Smith, S. D., & Pennington, B. F. (1987). Genetic influences. In K. A. Kavale, S. R. Forness, & M. Bender (Eds.), Handbook of learning disabilities (Vol. 1, pp. 49–75). Boston: Little, Brown.
63.
Stone, W. L., & La Greca, A. M. (1990). The social status of children with learning disabilities: A reexamination. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 23, 32–37.
64.
Sutter, E. (1988). Communication aid utilizing brain responses. In H. J. Murphy (Ed.), Proceedings of the Third Annual Conference on Computer Technology/Special Education/Rehabilitation, 3, 487–498.
65.
Swanson, M. E., & Bray, N. M. (1991). Learning disabilities: The medical view. In D. K. Reid, W. P. Hresko, & L. Swanson (Eds.), A cognitive approach to learning disabilities (pp. 69–102). Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
66.
Technology-Related Assistance for Individuals with Disabilities Act of 1988, P.L. 100--47, 29 U.S.C. 2201, 2202 (1988).
67.
Tindall, L. W., Gugerty, J. J., Heffron, T. J., & Godar, P. G. (1988). Replicating jobs in business and industry for persons with disabilities (Vol. 3). Madison: University of Wisconsin, Vocational Studies Center, School of Education.
68.
Torgesen, J. K., & Barker, T. A. (1995). Computers as aids in the prevention and remediation of reading disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 18, 76–87.
69.
U.S. Congress, Office of Technology Assessment. (1988). Power on! New tools for teaching and learning (OTA-SET-379). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
70.
Vaughn, S., & Lyon, G. R. (1994). Ethical considerations when conducting research with students with learning disabilities. In S. Vaughn & C. Bos (Eds.), Research issues in learning disabilities: Theory, methodology, assessment, and ethics (pp. 315–328). New York: Springer-Verlag.
71.
West, T. C. (1991). In the mind's eye.Buffalo, NY: Prometheus Books.
72.
Woodward, J. P., & Carnine, D. W. (1988). Antecedent knowledge and intelligent computer-assisted instruction. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 21, 131–139.
