Fourteen children with dyslexia were compared with controls matched for age and reading age on automatic processing under a dual-task paradigm. The primary task was a motor balance one, and the secondary task was an auditory-choice task. Main results show that the dyslexic group was more impaired in the dual-task condition compared to the single-task condition. The findings support the automatization deficit hypothesis of dyslexia.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Backman, J. E., Mamen, M., & Ferguson, H. B. (1984). Reading level design: Conceptual and methodological issues in reading research. Psychological Bulletin, 96, 560–568.
2.
Bowers, P. G., & Wolf, M. (1993). Theoretical links among naming speed, precise timing mechanisms and orthographic skill in dyslexia. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 5(1), 69–85.
3.
Brus, B. T., & Voeten, M. J. M. (1973). Eenminuuttest [One-minute test]. Nijmegen: Berkhout.
4.
Goswami, U., & Bryant, P. E. (1989). The interpretation of studies using the reading level design. Journal of Reading Behavior, 21, 413–424.
5.
Jackson, N. E., & Butterfield, E. C. (1989). Reading-level-match designs: Myths and realities. Journal of Reading Behavior, 21, 387–412.
6.
Navon, D., & Gopher, D. (1980). Task difficulty, resources, and dual-task performance. In R. Nickerson (Ed.), Attention and performance (Vol. 8, pp. 297–315). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
7.
Nicolson, R. I., & Fawcett, A. J. (1990). Automaticity: A new framework for dyslexia research?. Cognition, 35, 159–182.
8.
Siegel, S. (1956). Nonparametric methods for the behavioral sciences. New York: McGraw-Hill.
9.
Stanovich, K. E. (1981). Relationships between word decoding speed, general name retrieval ability, and reading progress in first-grade children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 73, 809–815.
10.
van der Leij, A. (1987). Special education in the Netherlands. In C. R. Reynolds & L. Mann (Eds.), Encyclopedia of special education (pp. 1094–1095). New York: Wiley.
11.
van der Leij, A., & Smeets, H. (1992). The assessment of reading disability. In L. Verhoeven & J. de Jong (Eds.), The construct of language proficiency (pp. 71–83). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
12.
Vellutino, F. R., & Scanlon, D. M. (1989). Some prerequisites for interpreting results from reading level matched designs. Journal of Reading Behavior, 21, 361–385.
13.
Wolf, M. (1986). Rapid alternating naming in the developmental dyslexias. Brain and Language, 27, 360–379.
14.
Wolf, M., & Obregon, M. (1992). Early naming deficits, developmental dyslexia, and a specific deficit hypothesis. Brain and Language, 42, 219–247.
15.
Yap, R. L. (1993). Automatic word processing deficits in dyslexia: Qualitative differences and specific remediation. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam.
16.
Yap, R. L., & van der Leij, A. (1993). Word processing in dyslexics: An automatic decoding deficit?. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 5, 261–279.
