As part of a broader investigation, this study sought to (a) provide a statewide “snapshot” of educators' views regarding the current status of and process associated with increased integration efforts for serving students with specific learning disabilities (SLD) in Virginia, and (b) document factors serving as the basis of or creating reluctance toward such efforts. Survey respondents included the population of special education supervisors and samples of general education supervisors, building principals, general secondary and elementary education teachers, and LD teachers (N = 788). Results suggest active efforts to increase the amount of time students with SLD spend in general classroom settings; however, limited program change-related guidelines or category-specific outcome-monitoring measures were reported. Across groups, participants expressed doubts regarding the adequacy of general education teachers' skills for making needed instructional adaptations. Over half of the respondents tended to disagree or disagreed that general education teachers were willing to make needed adaptations for students with SLD. Differences in the views expressed by the different respondent groups were examined.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Adelman, H. S. (1989). Toward solving the problem of misidentification and limited intervention efficacy. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 22, 608–612.
2.
Adelman, H. S., & Taylor, L. (1986). The problems of definition and differentiation and the need for a classification system. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 19, 514–520.
3.
Afflect, J., Madge, S., Adams, A., & Lowenbraun, S. (1988). Integrated classroom versus resource model: Academic viability and effectiveness. Exceptional Children, 54, 339–348.
4.
Algozzine, B., & Ysseldyke, J. E. (1986). The future of the LD field: Screening and diagnosis. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 19, 394–398.
5.
Anderegg, M., & Vergason, G. (1988). An analysis of one of the cornerstones of the Regular Education Initiative. Focus on Exceptional Children, 20(8), 1–7.
6.
Association for Children and Adults with Learning Disabilities. (1986). Position statement on a regular education/special education initiative. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. EC 190 233)
7.
Baker, J. M., & Zigmond, N. (1990). Are regular education classes equipped to accommodate students with learning disabilities?Exceptional Children, 56, 515–526.
8.
Bauwens, J., Hourcade, J. J., & Friend, M. (1989). Cooperative teaching: A model for general and special education integration. Remedial and Special Education, 10(2), 17–22.
9.
Bear, G., Clever, A., & Proctor, W. (1991). Self-perceptions of nonhandicapped children and children with learning disabilities in integrated classes. The Journal of Special Education, 24, 409–426.
10.
Beltempo, J., & Achille, P. A. (1990). The effect of special class placement on the self-concept of children with learning disabilities. Child Study Journal, 20(2), 81–103.
11.
Bryan, T., Bay, M., & Donahue, M. (1988). Implications of the learning disabilities definition for the Regular Education Initiative. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 21, 23–28.
12.
Byrnes, M. (1990). The Regular Education Initiative debate: A view from the field. Exceptional Children, 56, 345–349.
13.
Coates, R. D. (1989). The Regular Education Initiative and opinions of regular classroom teachers. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 22, 532–536.
14.
Coles, G. S. (1989). Excerpts from The Learning Mystique: A Critical Look at “Learning disabilities.”Journal of Learning Disabilities, 22, 267–273, 277.
15.
Collier, C., & Hoover, J. J. (1987). Socio-cultural considerations when referring minority children for learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Focus, 3, 39–45.
16.
Cooper, D., & Speece, D. (1990). Maintaining at-risk children in regular education settings: Initial effects of individual differences and classroom environments. Exceptional Children, 57, 117–126.
17.
Council for Learning Disabilities. (1993). Concerns about the “full inclusion” of students with learning disabilities in regular education classrooms. Learning Disability Quarterly, 16, 126.
18.
Davis, J. C., & Maheady, L. (1991). The Regular Education Initiative: What do three groups of education professionals think?Teacher Education and Special Education, 14, 211–220.
19.
Davis, W. E. (1989). The Regular Education Initiative debate: Its promises and problems. Exceptional Children, 55, 440–447.
20.
Division for Learning Disabilities. (1987). A response to the regular education/special education initiative. Focus on Exceptional Children, 2(2), 75–77.
21.
Doyle, R., & LaGrasta, T. (1988). A policy for systemwide implementation of the “Regular Education Initiative.”Sharon, MA: Sharon Public Schools. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 306 714)
22.
Fuchs, D., & Fuchs, L. (1988). Evaluation of the Adaptive Learning Environment Model. Exceptional Children, 55, 115–127.
23.
Gartner, A. (1986). Disabling help: Special education at the crossroads. Exceptional Children, 53, 72–76.
24.
Gartner, A., & Lipsky, K. (1989). The yoke of special education: How to break it. Rochester, NY: National Center on Education and the Economy. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 307 792)
25.
Garvar-Pinhas, A., & Schmelkin, L. P. (1989). Administrators' and teachers' attitudes toward mainstreaming. Remedial and Special Education, 10(4), 38–43.
26.
Hauptman, E. (1982). Communication between special educators and mainstream teachers. Hempstead, NY: Hofstra University. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. EC 152 670)
27.
Jenkins, J. R., & Heinen, A. (1989). Students' preferences for service delivery: Pull-out, in-class, or integrated models. Exceptional Children, 55, 516–523.
28.
Jenkins, J., Pious, C., & Peterson, D. (1988). Categorical programs for remedial and handicapped students: Issues and validity. Exceptional Children, 55, 147–158.
29.
Kauffman, J. M., Gerber, M., & Semmel, M. I. (1988). Arguable assumptions underlying the Regular Education Initiative. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 21, 6–11.
30.
Keogh, B. (1990). Narrowing the gap between policy and practice. Exceptional Children, 57, 186–190.
31.
Lerner, J. (1987). The Regular Education Initiative: Some unanswered questions. Learning Disabilities Focus, 3, 3–7.
32.
Lieberman, L. M. (1985). Special education and regular education: A merger made in heaven?Exceptional Children, 51, 513–516.
33.
Martin, E. (1987). Developing public policy concerning “regular” or “special” education for children with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Focus, 3, 11–16.
34.
McKinney, J., & Hocutt, A. (1988). Policy issues in the evaluation of the Regular Education Initiative. Learning Disabilities Focus, 4, 15–23.
35.
Mendenhall, W., Wackerly, D. D., & Scheaffer, R. L. (1990). Mathematical statistics with applications (4th ed.). Boston: PWS-Kent.
36.
National Council on Disabilities. (1989). The education of students with disabilities: Where do we stand? (A report to the President and the Congress of the United States.). Washington, DC: Author. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 315 961)
37.
National Joint Committee on Learning Disabilities. (1982). Issues in the delivery of educational services to individuals with learning disabilities. Baltimore: The Orton Dyslexia Society.
38.
National Joint Committee on Learning Disabilities. (1991). Providing appropriate education for students with learning disabilities in regular education classrooms. Baltimore: The Orton Dyslexia Society.
39.
Nowacek, E. J., McKinney, J., & Hallahan, D. (1990). Instructional behaviors of more and less effective beginning regular and special educators. Exceptional Children, 57, 140–149.
40.
Pianta, R. C. (1990). Widening the debate on educational reform: Prevention as a viable alternative. Exceptional Children, 56, 306–313.
41.
Reynolds, M. C., Wang, M. C., & Walberg, H. J. (1987). The necessary restructuring of special and regular education. Exceptional Children, 53, 391–398.
42.
Ross, R. P. (1990). Consistency among school psychologists in evaluating discrepancy scores: A preliminary study. Learning Disability Quarterly, 13, 209–219.
43.
Schulte, A., Osborne, S., & McKinney, J. (1990). Academic outcomes for students with learning disabilities in consultation and resource programs. Exceptional Children, 57, 162–172.
44.
Semmel, M. I., Abernathy, T. V., Butera, G., & Lesar, S. (1991). Teacher perceptions of the Regular Education Initiative. Exceptional Children, 58, 9–23.
45.
Shepard, L. (1983). Assessment of learning disabilities. University of Colorado. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 227 134)
46.
Stainback, S., & Stainback, W. (1987). Integration versus cooperation: A commentary on “Educating children with learning problems: A shared responsibility.”Exceptional Children, 54, 66–68.
47.
Stainback, W., & Stainback, S. (1984). A rationale for the merger of special and regular education. Exceptional Children, 51, 102–111.
48.
U.S. Department of Education. (1992). Fourteenth annual report to Congress on the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Act. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
49.
Virginia Department of Education (1991). 1991 Virginia Education Directory. Richmond, VA: Author.
50.
Wagner, M. (1990, April). The school programs and school performance of secondary students classified as learning disabled: Findings from the national transition study of special education students. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Boston.
51.
Walsh, J. M. (1991). Student, teacher, and parent preference for less restrictive special education models: Cooperative teaching. MD: Anne Arundel County Public Schools. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 333 664)
52.
Wang, M., & Reynolds, M. (1985). Avoiding the “Catch 22” in special education reform. Exceptional Children, 51, 497–502.
53.
Wiederholt, J. L. (1989). Restructuring special education services: The past, present, and the future. Learning Disability Quarterly, 12, 181–191.
54.
Will, M. (1986). Educating students with learning problems—A shared responsibility. Exceptional Children, 52, 411–415.
55.
Zigmond, N., & Baker, J. (1990). Mainstream experiences for learning disabled students (Project MELD): Preliminary report. Exceptional Children, 57, 176–185.
56.
Zigmond, N., Levin, E., & Laurie, T. E. (1985). Managing the mainstream: An analysis of teacher attitudes and student performance in mainstream high school programs. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 18, 535–541.
