The present study examined the development of phonological and reading skills in 171 students (98 males, 73 females) from the beginning of first grade (Time 1) to the end of second grade (Time 4). Based on their reading and intelligence scores at the end of second grade, these students were placed into nondisabled (ND), reading disabled (RD), or garden-variety poor reading (GV) groups. Although each group made gains in phonological processing, large differences were found between the ND and RD/GV groups. The RD and GV groups performed similarly on many of the tasks. Consistent with the literature, it was found that intelligence does not differentiate between good and poor readers. The most important finding of the present study was that reader-group membership at Time 4 could be very accurately determined from students' Time 1 scores. All of the children in the RD and GV groups were correctly identified, and only 3 of the 148 ND children were misclassified, indicating that children at risk for reading difficulties can be very accurately identified very early in their academic experiences.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bradley, L., & Bryant, P. (1985). Rhyme and reason in reading and spelling. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
2.
Bruck, M. (1992). Persistence of dyslexics' phonological awareness deficits. Developmental Psychology, 28, 874–;886.
3.
Dunn, L. M., & Dunn, L. M. (1981). Peabody picture vocabulary test-Revised. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
4.
Ehri, L. C. (1979). Linguistic insight: Threshold of reading acquisition. In T. G. Waller & G. E. MacKinnon (Eds.), Reading research: Advances in theory and practice (Vol. 1, pp. 63–;114). New York: Academic Press.
5.
Ehri, L. C., & Wilce, L. S. (1979). The mnemonic value of orthography among beginning readers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 26–;40.
6.
Ellis, N., & Large, B. (1987). The development of reading: As you seek so shall you find. British Journal of Psychology, 78, 1–;28.
7.
Fox, B., & Routh, D. K. (1975). Analyzing spoken language into words, syllables, and phonemes: A developmental study. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 4, 331–;342.
8.
Fox, B., & Routh, D. K. (1976). Phonemic analysis and synthesis as word-attack skills. Journal of Educational Psychology, 68, 70–;74.
9.
Fox, B., & Routh, D. K. (1980). Phonemic analysis and severe reading disability in children. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 9, 115–;119.
10.
Fox, B., & Routh, D. K. (1983). Reading disability, phonemic analysis, and dysphonetic spelling: A follow-up study. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 12, 28–;32.
11.
Gough, P. B., & Tunmer, W. E. (1986). Decoding, reading, and reading disability. Remedial and Special Education, 7(1), 6–;10.
12.
Helfgott, J. A. (1976). Phonemic segmentation and blending skills of kindergarten children: Implications for beginning reading acquisition. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 1, 157–;169.
13.
Hohn, W. E., & Ehri, L. C. (1983). Do alphabet letters help prereaders acquire phonemic segmentation skillJournal of Educational Psychology, 75, 752–;762.
14.
Hurford, D. P. (1990). Training phonemic segmentation ability with a phonemic discrimination intervention in second- and third-grade children with reading disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 23, 564–;569.
15.
Hurford, D. P., Darrow, L. J., Edwards, T. L., Howerton, C. J., Mote, C. R., Schauf, J. D., & Coffey, P. (1993). An examination of the development of phonemic processing abilities in children during their first-grade year. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 26, 167–;177.
16.
Hurford, D. P., Gilliland, C., & Ginavan, S. (1992). Examination of the intrasyllable phonemic discrimination deficit in children with reading disabilities. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 17, 83–;88.
17.
Hurford, D. P., & Sanders, R. E. (1990). Assessment and remediation of a phonemic discrimination deficit in reading disabled second- and fourth-graders. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 50, 396–;415.
18.
Hurford, D. P., & Shedelbower, A. (1993). The relationship between discrimination and memory ability in children with reading disabilities. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 18, 101–;113.
19.
Jorm, A. F., & Share, D. L. (1983). Phonological recoding and reading acquisition. Applied Psycholinguistics, 4, 103–;147.
20.
Lundberg, I., Frost, J., & Petersen, O. (1988). Effects of an extensive program for stimulating phonological awareness in preschool children. Reading Research Quarterly, 23, 263–;284.
21.
Rack, J. P. (1989, April). Reading-IQ discrepancies and the phonological deficit in reading disability. Paper presented at the biennial meeting of the Society of Research in Child Development, Kansas City, MO.
22.
Seidenberg, M. S., Bruck, M., Fornarolo, G., & Backman, J. (1985). Word recognition processes of poor and disabled readers: Do they necessarily differApplied Psycholinguistics, 6, 161–;180.
23.
Siegel, L. S. (1989a). IQ is irrelevant to the definition of learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 22, 469–;478.
24.
Siegel, L. S. (1989b). Why we do not need IQ test scores in the definition and analyses of learning disability. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 22, 514–;518.
25.
Siegel, L. S. (1992). An evaluation of the discrepancy definition of dyslexia. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 25, 618–;629.
26.
Stanovich, K. E. (1986). Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 21, 360–;407.
27.
Stanovich, K. E. (1988). Explaining the differences between the dyslexic and the garden-variety poor reader: The phonological-core variable-difference model. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 21, 590–;612.
28.
Torgesen, J. K. (1988). Why IQ is relevant to the definition of learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 22, 484–;486.
29.
Treiman, R., & Baron, J. (1983). Phonemic-analysis training helps children benefit from spelling-sound rules. Memory and Cognition, 11, 382–;389.
30.
Wagner, R. K., Torgesen, J. K. (1987). The nature of phonological processing and its causal role in the acquisition of reading skills. Psychological Bulletin, 101, 192–;212.
31.
Woodcock, R. W. (1987). Woodcock reading mastery tests—;Revised. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
32.
Zifcak, M. (1981). Phonological awareness and reading acquisition. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 6, 117–;126.
