Adams, M. J. (1990). Beginning to read: Thinking and learning about print. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
2.
Blachman, B. A. (1987). An alternative classroom reading program for learning disabled and other low-achieving children. In R. Bowler (Ed.), Intimacy with language: A forgotten basic in teacher education (pp. 49–55). Baltimore: Orton Dyslexia Society.
3.
Blachman, B. A., Ball, E. W., Black, R. S., & Tangel, D. M. (in press). Kindergarten teachers develop phoneme awareness in low-income, inner-city classrooms: Does it make a difference?Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal.
4.
Blachman, B., & James, S. (1986, October). A longitudinal study of metalinguistic abilities and reading achievement in primary grade children. Paper presented at the meeting of the International Academy for Research in Learning Disabilities, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL.
5.
Byrne, B., Freebody, P., & Gates, A. (1992). Longitudinal data on the relations of word-reading strategies to comprehension, reading time, and phonemic awareness. Reading Research Quarterly, 27, 141–151.
6.
Chall, J. S. (1983). Stages of reading development. New York: McGraw-Hill.
7.
Dunn, L. M., & Dunn, L. M. (1981). Pea-body picture vocabulary test-Revised. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
8.
Ehri, L. (1991). Learning to read and spell words. In L. Rieben & C. A. Perfetti (Eds.), Learning to read: Basic research and its implications (pp. 57–73). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
9.
Gough, P. B., & Juel, C. (1991). The first stages of word recognition. In L. Rieben & C. A. Perfetti (Eds.), Learning to read: Basic research and its implications (pp. 47–56). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
10.
Gough, P. B., & Tunmer, W. E. (1986). Decoding, reading, and reading disability. Remedial and Special Education, 7(1), 6–10.
11.
Hammill, D. (1972). Training visual perceptual processes. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 5, 552–559.
12.
Juel, C. (1988). Learning to read and write: A longitudinal study of 54 children from first through fourth grades. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 437–447.
13.
Stanovich, K. E. (1986). Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 21, 360–407.
14.
Stanovich, K. E. (1991). Changing models of reading and reading acquisition. In L. Rieben & C. A. Perfetti (Eds.), Learning to read: Basic research and its implications (pp. 19–31). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
15.
Torgesen, J. K. (1991). Cross-age consistency in phonological processing. In S. A. Brady & D. P. Shankweiler (Eds.), Phonological processes in literacy: A tribute to Isabelle Y. Liberman (pp. 187–193). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
16.
Vellutino, F. R. (1991). Introduction to three studies on reading acquisition: Convergent findings on theoretical foundations of code-oriented versus whole-language approaches to reading instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 437–443.
17.
Vellutino, F. R., Steger, B. M., Moyer, S. C., Harding, C. J., & Niles, J. A. (1977). Has the perceptual deficit hypothesis led us astray?Journal of Learning Disabilities, 10, 375–384.
18.
Wagner, R. K., Torgesen, J. K., & Rashotte, C. A. (in press). The development of reading-related phonological processing abilities: New evidence of bi-directional causality from a latent variable longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology.
19.
Wechsler, D. (1974). Wechsler intelligence scale for children-Revised. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corp.
20.
Wolf, M. (1991). Naming speed and reading: The contribution of the cognitive neurosciences. Reading Research Quarterly, 26, 123–141.