The effects of a criminal diversion project on recidivism rates are described for late-age adolescent defendants with learning disabilities. During the 24-month study period, 73 subjects who had completed the project's requirements and received targeted psychosocial, educational, and vocational treatments were compared with regard to criminal recidivism rates with 85 subjects who did not complete the project and a matched group of 34 untreated subjects. Based on official crime statistics, subjects who had completed the project were found to have a significantly lower recidivism rate (12%) relative to noncompleters (40%) and to subjects in the matched group (38%) (p < .001) over a follow-up period of, on average, 20 months. An analysis of differences between groups on a variety of demographic and criminal justice characteristics suggests that the groups were comparable with regard to the variables assessed. Potential mechanisms contributing to the favorable outcome are noted, as is the importance of targeting treatments so that they are skills oriented and combine the more general needs of delinquent youth with the particular needs of adolescents with learning disabilities.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Achenbach, T. M., & Edelbrock, C. (1987). Manual for the youth self-report. Burlington: Department of Psychiatry, University of Vermont.
2.
Alexander, J. F., Barton, C., Schiavo, R. S., & Parsons, B. V. (1976). Systems-behavioral intervention with families of delinquents: Therapist characteristics, family behavior, and outcome. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 44, 656–664.
3.
Alexander, J. F., & Parsons, B. V. (1973). Short-term behavioral intervention with delinquent families: Impact on family process and recidivism. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 81, 219–225.
4.
American Psychiatric Association. (1980). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (3rd ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
5.
Amster, J., & Lazarus, P. (1984). Identifying learning problems in youthful offenders: Rationale and model. Journal of Offender Counseling Services and Rehabilitation, 6, 65–77.
6.
Barton, C., Alexander, J. F., Waldron, H., Turner, C. W., & Warburton, J. (1985). Generalizing treatment effects of functional family therapy: Three replications. American Journal of Family Therapy, 13, 16–26.
7.
Bernstein, S., & Rulo, J. H. (1976). Learning disabilities and learning problems: Their implications for the juvenile justice system. Juvenile Justice, 27, 43–47.
8.
Brier, N. (1989). The relationship between learning disability and delinquency: A review and reappraisal. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 22, 546–553.
9.
Brier, N. (in press). Psychological adjustment and adults with severe learning difficulties: Implications of the literature on children and adolescents with learning disabilities for research and practice. Learning Disabilities: A Multidisciplinary Journal.
10.
Brier, N., Carlson-Perez, E., & Kaufman, J. (1989). The evolution and application of a screening instrument to identify adolescents with developmental disabilities. Juvenile and Family Court Journal, 40(1), 35–42.
11.
Broder, P. K., Dunivant, N., Smith, E. C., & Sutton, L. P. (1981). Further observations on the link between learning disabilities and juvenile delinquency. Journal of Educational Psychology, 73, 838–850.
12.
Collingwood, T., & Genthner, R. W. (1980). Skills training as treatment for juvenile delinquents. Professional Psychology, 11, 591–598.
13.
Cone, T. E., & Wilson, L. R. (1981). Quantifying a severe discrepancy: A critical analysis. Learning Disability Quarterly, 4, 163–174.
14.
Cosgrove-Dapuzzo, D. (1989). The Adolescent Behavior Checklist: Initial validity and reliability results. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Yeshiva University, Bronx, NY.
15.
Demb, H., Brier, N., & Huron, R. (1986). The adolescent behavior checklist. Unpublished manuscript.
16.
Duling, F., Eddy, S., & Risko, V. (1970). Learning disabilities of juvenile delinquents. Morgantown, WV: Robert F. Kennedy Youth Center.
17.
Dunivant, N. (1982). The relationship between learning disabilities and juvenile delinquency. Williamsburg, VA: National Center for State Courts.
18.
Elliot, D. S., Huzinga, D., & Ageton, S. S. (1985). Explaining delinquency and drug use. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
19.
Evans, L. D. (1990). A conceptual overview of the regression discrepancy model for equating severe discrepancy between IQ and achievement scores. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 23, 406–412.
20.
Gittelman-Klein, R. (1987). Prognosis of attention deficit disorder and its management in adolescence. Pediatrics in Review, 8, 216–222.
21.
Gordon, D. A., McGreen, P., & Arbuthnot, J. (1984, June). Short-term family therapy with court referred delinquents. Paper presented at the meeting of the Society for Psychotherapy Research, Smuggler's Notch, VT.
22.
Henggeler, S. W. (1989). Delinquency in adolescence. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
23.
Interagency Committee on Learning Disabilities. (1987). Learning disabilities: A report to the United States Congress. Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of Health.
24.
Jastak, S., & Wilkinson, G. S. (1984). Wide range achievement test-Revised, administration manual. Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services.
25.
LaGreca, A. M. (1981). Social behavior and social perception in learning disabled children: A review with implications for social skills training. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 6, 395–416.
26.
Lane, B. (1980). The relationship of learning disabilities to juvenile delinquency: Current status. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 13, 425–434.
27.
Larson, K. (1988). A research review and alternative hypothesis explaining the link between learning disability and delinquency. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 21, 357–363.
28.
McPherson, S. J., McDonald, L. E., & Ryder, C. W. (1983). Intensive counseling with families of juvenile offenders. Juvenile and Family Court Counseling, 34, 27–33.
29.
Murray, C. (1976). The link between learning disabilities and juvenile delinquency: Current theory and knowledge (Grant No. 76JN-99-0009). Washington, DC: Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Operations Task Group, Law Enforcement Administration, U.S. Department of Justice.
30.
Quay, H. C. (1987). Intelligence. In H. C. Quay (Ed.), Handbook of juvenile delinquency (pp. 106–117). New York: Wiley.
31.
Richman, N., Stevenson, J., & Graham, P. J. (1982). Preschool to school: A behavioral study. London: Academic Press.
32.
Robbins, D. M., Beck, J. C., Pries, R., Cags, D. J., & Smith, C. (1983). Learning disability and neuropsychological impairment in adjudicated, unincarcerated male delinquents. Journal of The American Academy of Child Psychiatry, 22, 40–46.
33.
Romig, D. A. (1978). Diversion from the juvenile justice system. In D. A. Romig (Ed.), Justice for our children (pp. 117–123). Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
34.
Rutter, M., & Giller, H. (1984). Juvenile delinquency. New York: Guilford.
35.
Snyder, J., & Patterson, G. R. (1987). Family interaction and delinquent behavior. In H. C. Quay (Ed.), Handbook of juvenile delinquency (pp. 216–243). New York: Wiley.
36.
Wechsler, D. (1981). Manual for the Wechsler adult intelligence scale-Revised. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corp.
37.
Weisz, J. R., Walter, B. R., Weiss, B., Fernandez, G. A., & Mikow, V. A. (1990). Arrests among emotionally disturbed violent and assaultive individuals following minimal versus lengthy intervention through North Carolina's Willie M. Program. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 58, 720–728.
38.
Young, T. M., Pappenfort, D. M., & Marlow, C. R. (1983). Residential group care, 1966-1981: Facilities for children and youth with special problems and needs (Preliminary report of selected findings from the national survey of residental group care facilities). Chicago: School of Social Service Administration, University of Chicago.
