Although there is a growing body of information, materials, and instructional strategies for adults with learning disabilities receiving remedial reading instruction, the same is not available for other areas of Adult Basic Education, including remedial math, sixth- through eighth-grade-level pre-GED basic skills, and secondary subject areas in the GED curriculum. This review presents possibilities for consideration in developing instructional and testing strategies for GED students with learning disabilities. These strategies should be applicable to traditional academic content areas, cost effective for programs with limited financial resources, and appropriate for the relatively short-term instructional time frame characteristic of the Adult Basic Education setting.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Anderson, C. W. (1991, September). Teaching subject matter to students who can't read, write, or spell. Paper presented at the conference of the West-Middle Tennessee Branch of the Orton Dyslexia Society, Memphis.
2.
Balmuth, M. (1988). Recruitment and retention in adult basic education: What does the research say?Journal of Reading, 31, 620–623.
3.
Bianco, L., & McCormick, S. (1989). Analysis of effects of a reading study skill program for high school learning-disabled students. Journal of Educational Research, 82, 282–288.
4.
Bos, C. S., & Anders, P. L. (1990). Effects of interactive vocabulary instruction on the vocabulary learning and reading comprehension of junior-high learning disabled students. Learning Disability Quarterly, 13, 31–42.
5.
Breault, M. (1983). The effects of selected variables in the arithmetical problem solving of learning disabled children. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Connecticut, Storrs.
6.
Brown, A. L., & Palincsar, A. S. (1987). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension strategies: A natural history of one program for enhancing learning. In J. Day & J. Borkowski (Eds.), Intelligence and exceptionality: New directions in theory, assessment, and instructional practices (pp. 81–132). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
7.
Cawley, J. F., Miller, J. H., & School, B. A. (1987). A brief inquiry of arithmetic word-problem-solving among learning disabled secondary students. Learning Disabilities Focus, 2, 87–93.
8.
Clearinghouse on Adult Learning and Literacy. (1990). Instructional strategies for adults with learning disabilities. Washington, DC: Division of Adult Education and Literacy, U.S. Department of Education.
9.
Clearinghouse on Adult Learning and Literacy. (n.d.). Who are adults with disabilities?Washington, DC: Division of Adult Education and Literacy, U.S. Department of Education.
10.
Cobb, R. M., & Crump, D. W. (1984). Post-school status of young adults identified as learning disabled while enrolled in public schools: A comparison of those enrolled and not enrolled in learning disabilities programs, Final report. Columbus, OH: ERIC Clearinghouse on Adult, Career, and Vocational Education. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 253 029)
11.
Corley, M. A. (1992). The GED teacher as facilitator of learning: A contradiction of terms?Adult Learning, 3, 17–18.
12.
Deshler, D. D., & Lenz, B. K. (1989). The strategies instructional approach. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 36, 203–224.
13.
Deshler, D. D., & Schumaker, J. B. (1986). Learning strategies: An instructional alternative for low-achieving adolescents. Exceptional Children, 52, 583–590.
14.
Deshler, D. D., Schumaker, J. B., Alley, G. R., Warner, M. M., & Clark, F. (1982). Learning disabilities in adolescent and young adult populations: Research implications. Focus on Exceptional Children, 15, 1–12.
15.
Deshler, D. D., Schumaker, J. B., Lenz, B. K., & Ellis, E. (1984). Academic and cognitive interventions for LD adolescents: Part II. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 17, 170–187.
16.
Dodd, J. M., & Rose, P. M. (1991). Faculty handbook: Students with learning disabilities. Columbus, OH: ERIC Clearinghouse on Adult, Career, and Vocational Education. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 345 481)
17.
Ellis, E. S., Deshler, D. D., Lenz, B. K., Schumaker, J. B., & Clark, F. L. (1991). An instructional model for teaching learning strategies. Focus on Exceptional Children, 23(6), 1–24.
18.
GED Testing Service. (1990). GED test accommodations for candidates with specific learning disabilities. Washington, DC: American Council on Education.
19.
Graham, S., Harris, K. R., MacArthur, C. A., & Schwartz, S. (1991). Writing and writing instruction for students with learning disabilities: Review of a research program. Learning Disability Quarterly, 14, 89–112.
20.
Harris, K. R., & Graham, S. (1985). Improving learning disabled students' composition skills: Self-control training strategy. Learning Disability Quarterly, 8, 27–36.
21.
Hartwell, R., Wiseman, D., & van Reusen, A. (1979). Modifying course content for mildly handicapped students at the secondary level. Teaching Exceptional Children, 12, 28–32.
22.
HEATH Resource Center. (1991). Resources for adults with learning disabilities. Washington, DC: American Council on Education.
23.
Hoffman, F. J., Sheldon, K. L., Minskoff, E. H., Sautter, S. W., Steidle, E. F., Baker, D. P., Bailey, M. B., & Echols, L. D. (1987). Needs of learning disabled adults. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 20, 43–52.
24.
Howell, R., Sidorenko, E., & Jurica, J. (1987). The effects of computer use on the acquisition of multiplication facts by a student with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 20, 336–341.
25.
Hughes, C. A., & Schumaker, J. B. (1991). Test-taking strategy instruction for adolescents with learning disabilities. Exceptionality: A Research Journal, 2, 205–221, 237–242.
26.
Hutchinson, N. L. (1993). Effects of cognitive strategy instruction on algebra problem solving of adolescents with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 16, 34–51.
27.
Johnson, D. (1990). Why can't my student learn like everyone else?Adult Learning, 2(2), 24–25, 28.
28.
Johnston, C. L. (1984). The learning disabled adolescent and young adult: An overview and critique of current practices. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 17, 386–391.
29.
Jordan, D. R. (1989). Jordan prescriptive tutorial reading program. Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
30.
Katsiyannis, A., & Prillaman, D. (1990). Teaching math using regular curricula. Teaching Exceptional Children, 23(1), 26–29.
31.
Koehler, S. L., Mulloy, M. E., & Terdy, D. (1992). Teachers, tools and techniques: A handbook for adult basic education and GED instruction. Des Plaines, IL: Adult Education Service Center of Northern Illinois. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 348 502)
32.
Lowe, J. H. (1993, July). Credibility: Building positive perceptions of the GED program. Paper presented at the annual conference of the GED Testing Service of the American Council on Education, San Francisco.
33.
Lowry, C. M. (1990). Teaching adults with learning disabilities. Columbus, OH: ERIC Clearinghouse on Adult, Career, and Vocational Education. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 321 156)
34.
MacArthur, C. A., Schwartz, S. S., & Graham, S. (1991). A model for writing instruction: Integrating word processing and strategy instruction into a process approach to writing. Learning Disabilities Practice, 6, 230–236.
35.
Manhattan Adult Learning and Resource Center. (1988). Project upgrade: Working with adults who have learning disabilities. Washington, DC: Division of Adult Education and Literacy, U.S. Department of Education.
36.
Marzola, E. (1987, April). An arithmetic verbal problem solving model for learning disabled students. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Washington, DC. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 283 679)
37.
Mastropieri, M. A., & Scruggs, T. E. (1988). Increasing content area learning of learning disabled students: Research implementation. Learning Disabilities Research, 4(1), 17–25.
38.
Mastropieri, M. A., Scruggs, T. E., & Shiah, S. (1991). Mathematics instruction for learning disabled students: A review of research. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 6, 89–98.
39.
Matson, S. (1988). The GED and learning disabled students: Suggestions for teaching, testing, and understanding the problem. Columbus, OH: ERIC Clearinghouse on Adult, Career, and Vocational Education. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 300 555)
40.
McCormick, S., & Cooper, J. O. (1991). Can SQ3R facilitate secondary learning, disabled students' literal comprehension of expository text? Three experiments. Reading Psychology, 12, 239–271.
41.
McIntyre, S. B., Test, D. W., Cooke, N. L., & Beattie, J. (1991). Using count-bys to increase multiplication facts fluency. Learning Disability Quarterly, 14, 82–88.
42.
Mercer, C. D., & Miller, S. P. (1992). Teaching students with learning problems in math to acquire, understand, and apply basic math facts. Remedial and Special Education, 13(3), 19–35, 61.
43.
Montague, M. (1991). Gifted and learning-disabled gifted students' knowledge and use of mathematical problem-solving strategies. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 14, 393–411.
44.
Nightingale, D. (1991). The learning disabled in employment and training programs: Research and evaluation report series 91-E. Columbus, OH: ERIC Clearinghouse on Adult, Career, and Vocational Education. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 339 175)
45.
Nuzum, M. (1983). The effects of a curriculum based on the information processing paradigm on the arithmetic problem solving performance of four learning disabled students. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Teachers College, Columbia University, New York.
46.
Oates, S. A., Turland, C., & Mehaffie, S. (1989). Hope for adult learning-disabled spellers. Reading Improvement, 26, 140–143.
47.
Palincsar, A. M., & Brown, A. L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension fostering and monitoring activities. Cognition & Instruction, 1, 117–175.
48.
Payne, N. (1992). Facilitating learning for adults with learning disabilities. Adult Learning, 3, 16–17.
49.
Polloway, E. A., Smith, J. D., & Patton, J. R. (1988). Learning disabilities: An adult development perspective. Learning Disability Quarterly, 11, 265–272.
50.
Pressley, M., Goodchild, F., Fleet, J., Zaj-chowski, R., & Evans, E.D. (1989). The challenges of classroom strategy instruction. Elementary School Journal, 89, 301–342.
51.
Reading Area Community College. (1990). Head start for learning disabled students: Final report 1990–1991. Columbus, OH: ERIC Clearinghouse on Adult, Career, and Vocational Education. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 342 908)
52.
Ross, J. M. (1987). Learning disabled adults: Who are they and what do we do with them?Lifelong Learning, 11(3), 4–7, 11.
53.
Ross-Gordon, J. (1989). Adults with learning disabilities: An overview for the adult educator. Columbus, OH: ERIC Clearinghouse on Adult, Career, and Vocational Education. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 315 664)
54.
Scheid, K. (1989). Cognitive and metacognitive learning strategy instruction: Its relevance for media and material design. Columbus, OH: LINC Resources, Inc. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 311 645)
55.
Smith, C. R. (1986). The future of the LD field: Intervention approaches. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 19, 461–472.
56.
Travis, G. Y. (1979). An adult educator views learning disabilities. Adult Literacy and Basic Education, 3, 85–92.
57.
U.S. Department of Education. (1991). Coordination policy statement of the Office of Vocational and Adult Education and the Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services. Washington, DC: Author.
58.
Vallecorsa, A. L., Ledford, R. R., & Parnell, G. G. (1991). Strategies for teaching composition skills to students with learning disabilities. Teaching Exceptional Children, 23(2), 52–55.
59.
Vanthournout, S. (1989). The math challenge: Preparing for the GED test. Adult Literacy and Basic Education, 13, 127–135.
60.
Wehrung-Schaffner, L., & Sapona, R. H. (1990). May the FORCE be with you: A test preparation strategy for learning disabled adolescents. Academic Therapy, 25, 291–300.
61.
Wong, B., & Jones, W. (1982). Increasing metacomprehension in learning disabled and normally achieving students through self-questioning training. Learning Disability Quarterly, 5, 228–238.
62.
Woodward, J., & Noell, J. (1991). Science instruction at the secondary level: Implications for students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 24, 227–284.
