This study was designed to demonstrate whether the differences in reading between students with learning disabilities (LD) and non-learning disabled students (NLD) can be explained by IQ. A sample of 133 Spanish children (85 male, 48 female) ranging in age from 8 to 13 years were classified into four groups according to IQ as measured by the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Revised (<80; 81—90; 91—109: 110—140) and into two groups based on reading level (LD and NLD). A lexical decision task was used and we manipulated different word parameters (length, positional syllabic frequency, and familiarity) and pseudoword parameters (length and positional syllabic frequency) to study the routes used by both groups. Our findings indicate that IQ does not explain the differences between children with LD and NLD children in lexical processing. We found that the lexical and sublexical parameters have a greater influence on students with LD than NLD students, independent of IQ. In synthesis, the LD group has more difficulty in lexical processing, which is influenced by poor phonological skills.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Aaron, P. (1991). Can reading disabilities be diagnosed without using intelligence tests?Journal of Learning Disabilities, 24, 178–186.
2.
Alvarez, C., Carreiras, M, & de Vega, M. (1992). Estudio estadístico de la ortografía castellana: (1) La frecuencia silábica [Statistical approach to Spanish orthographical: (1) The syllabic frequency]. Cognitiva, 4, 75–105.
3.
Baron, J. (1976). What we might know about orthographic rules. In S. Domic (Ed.), Attention and performance (Vol. 6, pp. 558). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
4.
Beech, J., & Awaida, M. (1992). Lexical and nonlexical routes: A comparison between normally achieving and poor readers. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 25, 196–206.
5.
Brown, A., & Campione, J. (1986). Psychological theory and the study of learning disabilities. American Psychologist, 14, 1059–1068.
6.
Brown, M. B., Engelman, L., & Jennrich, R. I. (1990). 2V analysis of variance and covariance with repeated measures. In W. J. Dixon (Ed.), BMDP statistical software manual (pp. 502). Los Angeles: BMDP Statistical Software.
7.
Cirrin, F. M. (1984). Lexical search speed in children and adults,Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 37, 158–175.
8.
Coltheart, M. (1978). Lexical access in simple reading tasks. In G. Underwood (Ed.), Strategies of information processing.New York: Academic Press.
9.
Coltheart, M. (1981). Disorders of reading and their implications for models of normal reading. Visible Language, 15, 245–286.
10.
Coltheart, M. (1985). In defense of dual-route models of reading. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 8, 709–710.
11.
Coltheart, M., Patterson, K., & Marshall, J. (1980). Deep dyslexia.London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
12.
de Vega, M., & Carreiras, M. (1989, September). The role of graphemic frequency in visual word processing.Paper presented at the Third European Conference for Research. on Learning and Instruction, Madrid.
13.
de Vega, M., Carreiras, M., Gutierrez-Calvo, M., & Alonso-Quecuty, M. (1990). Lectura y comprensibn: Una perspectiva cognitiva [Reading and comprehension: A cognitive perspective]. Madrid: Alianza Psicolog$iAa.
14.
Ehri, L.C., & Wilce, L. S. (1983). Development of word identification speed in skilled and less skilled beginning readers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 75, 3–18.
15.
Ellis, N. (1981). Visual and name coding in dyslexic children. Psychological Research, 43, 201–218.
16.
Felton, R. H., & Wood, F. B. (1992). A reading level match study of nonword reading skills in poor readers with varying IQs. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 25, 318–326.
17.
Foltz, G. S., & Polrrock, S. E. (1987). All purpose tester PC version (APT PC): An experiment development system. (Available from Gregory Foltz, 1650 Fairoak Dr. Colorado Springs, CO 80907; and Steven Polrrock, 8200 Neely Dr. #149, Austin, TX 78759)
18.
Forness, S. R., Sinclair, E., & Guthrie, D. (1983). Learning discrepancy formulas: Their use in actual practice. Learning Disability Quarterly, 6, 107–114.
19.
Garcia-Albea, J., Sánchez, R., & Del Viso, S. (1982). Efectos de la frecuencia de uso en el reconocimiento de palabras [Effects of familiarity on word recognition]. Investigation Psicologica, 1, 24–63.
20.
Hogaboam, T. W., & Perfetti, C. A. (1978). Lexical reading skills and the role of verbal experience in decoding,Journal of Educational Psychology, 70, 717–729.
21.
Johnston, R. S., & Thompson, G. B. (1989). Is dependence on phonological information in children's reading a product of instructional approach?Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 48, 131–145.
22.
Juilland, A., & Chang-Rodríguez, E. (1962). Frequency dictionary of Spanish words.Holland: Mouton.
23.
Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1980). A theory of reading: From eye fixations to comprehension. Psychological Review, 87, 329–354.
24.
Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1984). Using eye fixations to study reading comprehension. In D. E. Kieras & M. A. Just (Eds.), New methods in reading comprehension research (pp. 174). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
25.
Laberge, D., & Samuels, S. J. (1974). Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 6, 293–323.
26.
Laxon, V. J., Coltheart, V., & Keating, C. (1988). Children find friendly words friendly too: Words with many orthographic neighbours are easier to read and spell. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 58, 103–119.
27.
Lozano, L. (1991). Análisis de las diferentes estrategias lectoras en los alumnos de E.G.B.: El modelo evolutivo doble ruta ante el diagnóstico de las dislexias [Reading strategies in pupils from E.G.B.: The dual route developmental model in the diagnosis of dyslexia]. Unpublished manuscript, Universidad de Oviedo.
28.
Manis, F. R. (1985). Acquisition of word identification skills in normal and disabled readers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 77, 78–90.
29.
McClelland, J. L., & Rumelhart, D. E. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part 1. An account of basic findings. Psychological Review, 88, 375–407.
30.
Patterson, K. E. (1981). Neuropsychological approaches to the study of reading. British Journal of Psychology, 72, 141–174.
31.
Perfetti, C. A. (1985). Reading ability.New York: Oxford University Press.
32.
Rayner, K. (1988). Word recognition cues in children: The relative use of graphemic cues, orthographic cues, and grapheme-phoneme correspondence rules. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 473–479.
33.
Rispens. J., van Iperen, T., & van Duijn, G. (1991). The irrelevance of IQ to the definition of learning disabilities: Some empirical evidence,Journal of Learning Disabilities, 24, 434–438.
34.
Seidenberg, M. S. (1985). Explanatory adequacy and models of word recognition. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 8, 724–726.
35.
Seymour, P. H. (1987). Individual cognitive analysis of competent and impaired reading. British Journal of Psychology, 78, 483–506.
36.
Seymour, P. H., & Porpodas, C. (1980). Lexical and non-lexical processing of spelling in dyslexia. In U. Frith (Ed.), Cognitive processes in spelling. London: Academic Press.
37.
Share, D. L., Jorm, A. F., Matthews, R., & Maclean, R. (1988). Lexical decision and naming times of young disabled readers with function and content words. Australian journal of Psychology, 40, 11–18.
38.
Share, D. L., Jorm, A., McGee, R., Silva, P. A., Maclean, R., Matthews, R., & Williams, S. (1987). Dyslexia and other myths. Unpublished manuscript, University of Otago Medical School, Dunedin, New Zealand.
39.
Siegel, L. (1988). Evidence that IQ scores are irrelevant to the definition and analysis of reading disability. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 42, 201–215.
40.
Siegel, L. (1989). IQ is irrelevant to the definition of learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 22, 469–478.
41.
Siegel, L. (1990). IQ and learning disabilities: R.I.P. In H. Swanson & B. Keogh (Eds.), Learning disabilities: Theoretical and research issues.Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
42.
Solso, R., & Juel, C. (1980). Positional frequency and versatility of bigrams for two through nine letter English words. Behavior Research Methods and Computer, 12, 297–343.
43.
Stanovich, K. E. (1986). Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 22, 360–407.
44.
Stanovich, K. E. (1988). Explaining the differences between the dyslexic and the garden-variety poor reader: The phonological-core variable-difference model. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 21, 590–612.
45.
Taylor, I., & Taylor, M. M. (1983). The psychology of reading.New York: Academic Press.
46.
Torgesen, J. K. (1989). Why IQ is relevant to the definition of learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 22, 484–486.
47.
Toro, J., & Cervera, M. (1980). Test de análisis de lectoescritura [Test for assessment of reading and writing skills]. Madrid: Aprendizaje Visor.
48.
Valle, F. (1989). Errores en lectura y es-critura: Un modelo dual [Mistakes in reading and writing: A dual model]. Cognitiva, 2, 35–63.
49.
Valle, F.., & Cuetos, F. (1989). Las dislexias desde el enfoque neurocognitivo [The dyslexias from a neurocognitive perspective]. Sant Pau, 10, 9–19.
50.
Wechsler, D. (1974). Manual for the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Revised.San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corp.
