This study tested the hypothesis that a classification scheme developed for the subtyping of learning disabilities in children, when applied to a population of adolescents and adults, would result in subtyping into discrete and relatively homogeneous groups in terms of cognitive functioning and achievement. We compared three groups, arithmetic disability (AD), reading disability (RD), and reading and arithmetic disabilities (RAD), among themselves and with a comparison group with normal achievement (NA) on a variety of cognitive and achievement measures. The main findings were as follows: (a) Each of the groups differed significantly from the others on tests of reading, spelling, memory, and other cognitive measures; (b) both the RD and RAD groups showed a deficit in phonological processing, vocabulary, spelling, and STM; (c) the AD group performed similarly to the NA group on pseudoword reading and phonological processing, but did more poorly than the NA group on word reading and vocabulary; (d) on many tasks the RAD group performed more poorly than the other groups; and (e) the AD and RAD groups performed more poorly than the NA and RD groups on a visual-spatial task. This study demonstrated the validity of this classification scheme for the subtyping of learning disabilities in adolescents and adults.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Baker, J. G., Ceci, S. J., & Herrmann, N. D. (1987). Semantic structure and processing: Implications for the learning disabled child. In H. L. Swanson (Ed.), Memory and learning disabilities (pp. 85–110). Greenwich, CT: Greenwich, CT.
2.
Bennett, G. K., Seashore, H. G., & Wesman, A. G. (1973). Differential aptitude tests.San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corp.
3.
Berk, R. (1984). Screening and diagnosis of children with learning disabilities.Springfield, IL: Thomas.
4.
Boder, E. (1973). Developmental dyslexia: A diagnostic approach based on three atypical reading-spelling patterns.Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology,15, 663–687.
5.
Bowen, S. M., & Hynd, G. W. (1988). Do children with learning disabilities out-grow deficits in selective auditory attention? Evidence from dichotic listening in adults with learning disabilities.Journal of Learning Disabilities,21, 623–631.
6.
Brandys, C. F., & Rourke, B. P. (1991). Differential memory abilities in reading- and arithmetic-disabled children. In B. P. Rourke (Ed.), Neuropsychological validation of learning disability subtypes (pp. 73–96). New York: New York.
7.
Bruck, M. (1990). Word-recognition skills of adults with childhood diagnoses of dyslexia.Developmental Psychology,26, 439–454.
8.
Cunningham, A. E., & Stanovich, K. E. (1990). Assessing print exposure and orthographic processing skill in children: A quick measure of reading experience.Journal of Educational Psychology,82, 733–740.
9.
DeFries, J. C. (1985). Colorado reading project. In D, B. Gray. & J. F. Kavanagh (Eds.), Biobehavioral measures of dyslexia (pp. 107–122). Parkton, MD: Parkton, MD.
10.
DeFries, J. C., Olson, R. K., Pennington, B. F., & Smith, S. D. (1991). Colorado reading project: An update. In D, D. Duane. & D. B. Gray (Eds.), The reading brain: The biological basis of dyslexia (pp. 53–87). Parkton, MD: Parkton, MD.
11.
Doehring, D. G., Hoshko, I. M., & Bryans, B. N. (1979). Statistical classification of children with reading problems.Journal of Clinical Neuropsychology,1, 5–16.
12.
Fletcher, J. M. (1985). Memory for verbal and nonverbal stimuli in learning disabled subgroups: Analysis by selective reminding.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology,40, 244–259.
13.
Forness, S. R. (1990). Subtyping in learning disabilities: Introduction to the issues. In H, L. Swanson. & B. Keogh (Eds.), Learning disabilities: Theoretical and research issues (pp. 195–200). Hillsdale, NJ: Hillsdale, NJ.
14.
Forness, S. R., & Kavale, K. (1987). Depsychologising special education.Monographs in Behavioral Disorders,9, 2–14.
15.
Gerber, P. J., & Reiff, H. B. (1991). Speaking for themselves (International Academy for Research in Learning Disabilities Monograph Series, Monograph No. 9). Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.
16.
Jastak, S., & Wilkinson, G. S. (1984). The wide range achievement test-Revised.Wilmington, DE: Jastak Associates.
17.
Johnson, D. J., & Blalock, J. W. (1987). Adults with learning disabilities: Clinical studies.New York: Grune & Stratton.
18.
Johnson, D. J., & Myklebust, H. R. (1967). Learning disabilities: Educational principles and practice.New York: Grune & Stratton.
19.
Kavale, K., & Forness, S. R. (1984). A meta-analysis assessing the validity of Wechsler Scale profiles and recategorization: Patterns or parodies?Learning Disability Quarterly,7, 136–156.
20.
Kavale, K., & Forness, S. R. (1987). The far side of heterogeneity: A critical analysis of empirical subtyping research in learning disabilities.Journal of Learning Disabilities,20, 374–382.
21.
Kerlinger, F. N., & Pedhazur, E. J. (1973). Multiple regression in behavioral research.New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
22.
Kinsbourne, M., & Warrington, E. K. (1963). The developmental Gerstmann syndrome.Archives of Neurology,8, 490–501.
23.
Kosc, L. (1974). Developmental dyscalculia.Journal of Learning Disabilities,7, 164–177.
24.
Lyon, G. R. (1985). Identification and remediation of learning disability subtypes: Preliminary findings.Learning Disabilities Focus,1(1), 21–35.
25.
Lyon, R., Stewart, N., & Freeman, D. (1982). Neuropsychological characteristics of empirically derived subgroups of learning disabled readers.Journal of Clinical Neuropsychology,4, 343–365.
26.
McCue, M., & Goldstein, G. (1991). Neuropsychological aspects of learning disability in adults. In B. P. Rourke (Ed.), Neuropsychological validation of learning disability subtypes (pp. 311–329). New York: New York.
27.
McKinney, J. D., Short, E. J., & Feagans, L. (1985). Academic consequences of perceptual-linguistic subtypes of learning disabled children.Learning Disabilities Research,1(1), 6–17.
28.
Morris, R. D., & Walter, L. W. (1991). Subtypes of arithmetic-disabled adults: Validating childhood findings. In B. P. Rourke (Ed.), Neuropsychological validation of learning disability subtypes (pp. 330–348). New York: New York.
29.
Morrison, S. R., & Siegel, L. S. (1991). Arithmetic disability: Theoretical considerations and empirical evidence for this subtype. In L, V. Feagans., E, J. Short., & L. J. Meltzer (Eds.), Subtypes of learning disabilities (pp. 198–208). Hillsdale, NJ: Hillsdale, NJ.
30.
Olson, R. K., Kliegl, R., Davidson, B. J., & Foltz, G. (1985). Individual and developmental differences in reading disability. In G, E. MacKinnon. & T. G. Waller (Eds.), Reading research: Advances in theory and practice (Vol. 4, pp. 1–64). New York: Academic Press.
31.
Pennington, B. F., Van Orden, G. C., Smith, S. D., Green, P. A., & Haith, M. M. (1990). Phonological processing skills and deficits in adult dyslexics.Child Development,61, 1753–1998.
32.
Rourke, B. P. (1985). Overview of learning disabilities subtypes. In B. P. Rourke (Ed.), Neuropsychology of learning disabilities: Essentials of subtype analysis (pp. 3–14). New York: New York.
33.
Rourke, B. P. (1991). Validation of learning disabilities subtypes: An overview. In B. P. Rourke (Ed.), Neuropsychological validation of learning disability subtypes (pp. 3–11). New York: New York.
34.
Rourke, B. P., & Finlayson, M. A. (1978). Neuropsychological significance of variations in patterns of academic performance: Verbal and visual-spatial abilities.Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology,6, 121–133.
35.
Rourke, B. P., & Strang, J. D. (1983). Subtypes of reading and arithmetic disabilities: A neuropsychological analysis. In M. Butler (Ed.), Developmental neuropsychiatry (pp. 473–488). New York: New York.
36.
Russell, D. L., & Rourke, B. P. (1991). Con-current and predictive validity of phonetic accuracy of misspellings in normal and disabled readers and spellers. In B. P. Rourke (Ed.), Neuropsychological validation of learning disability subtypes (pp. 57–72). New York: New York.
37.
Salvia, J., Gajar, A., Gajria, M., & Salvia, S. (1988). A comparison of WAIS-R profiles of nondisabled college freshmen and college students with learning disabilities.Journal of Learning Disabilities,21, 632–636.
38.
Sattler, J. M. (1982). Assessment of children's intelligence and special abilities (2nd ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
39.
Shafrir, U., Ogilvie, M., & Bryson, M. (1990). Attention to errors and learning: Across-task and across-domain analysis of the post-failure reflectivity measure.Cognitive Development,5, 405–425.
40.
Shafrir, U., & Siegel, L. S. (1992). Preference for visual scanning strategies vs. phonological rehearsal in university students with reading disabilities. Manuscript submitted for publication.
41.
Shafrir, U., Siegel, L. S., & Chee, M. (1990). Learning disability, inferential skills, and post-failure reflectivity.Journal of Learning Disabilities,23, 506–517.
42.
Shankweiler, D., Liberman, I. Y., Mark, L. S., Fowler, C. A., & Fischer, F. W. (1979). The speech code and learning to read.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory,5, 531–545.
43.
Siegel, L. S. (1985). Psycholinguistic aspects of reading disabilities. In L, S. Siegel. & F. J. Morrison (Eds.), Cognitive development in atypical children (pp. 45–66). New York: New York.
44.
Siegel, L. S. (1986). Phonological deficits in children with reading disability.Canadian Journal of Special Education,2, 45–54.
45.
Siegel, L. S. (1988). Evidence that IQ scores are irrelevant to the definition and analysis of reading disability.Canadian Journal of Psychology,42, 201–215.
46.
Siegel, L. S. (1989). IQ is irrelevant to the definition of learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities,22, 469–478, 486.
47.
Siegel, L. S. (in press). Phonological processing deficits as the basis of a reading disability. Developmental Review.
48.
Siegel, L. S., & Feldman, W. (1983). Non-dyslexic children with combined writing and arithmetic difficulties.Clinical Pediatrics,22, 241–244.
49.
Siegel, L. S., & Heaven, R. K. (1986). Categorization of learning disabilities. In S. J. Ceci (Ed.), Handbook of cognitive, social and neuropsychological aspects of learning disabilities (Vol. 1, pp. 95–121). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
50.
Siegel, L. S., & Linder, B. A. (1984). Short-term memory processes in children with reading and arithmetic learning disabilities.Developmental Psychology,20, 200–207.
51.
Siegel, L. S., & Ryan, E. B. (1984). Reading disability as a language disorder.Remedial and Special Education,5(3), 28–33.
52.
Siegel, L. S., & Ryan, E. B. (1988). Development of grammatical sensitivity, phonological, and short-term memory skills in normally achieving and learning disabled children.Developmental Psychology,24, 28–37.
53.
Siegel, L. S., & Ryan, E. B. (1989a). The development of working memory in normally achieving and subtypes of learning disabled children.Child Development,60, 973–980.
54.
Siegel, L. S., & Ryan, E. B. (1989b). Subtypes of developmental dyslexia: The influence of definitional variables.Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal,1, 257–287.
55.
Silverstein, A. B. (1982). Two- and four-subset short forms of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Revised.Journal of Counselling and Clinical Psychology,50, 415–418.
56.
Spellacy, F., & Peter, B. (1978). Dyscalculia and elements of the developmental Gerstmann Syndrome in school children.Cortex,14, 197–206.
57.
Spreen, O. (1988). Learning disabled growing up: A follow-up into adulthood.New York: Oxford University Press.
58.
Stanovich, K. E. (1986). Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy.Reading Research Quarterly,21, 360–407.
59.
Stanovich, K. E. (1988a). Explaining the differences between the dyslexic and garden variety poor reader: The phonological-core variance-difference model. Journal of Learning Disabilities,21, 590–604, 612.
60.
Stanovich, K. E. (1988b). The right and wrong places to look for the cognitive locus of reading disability.Annals of Dyslexia,38, 154–177.
61.
Stanovich, K. E. (1991). Conceptual and empirical problems with discrepancy definitions of reading disability.Learning Disability Quarterly,14, 269–280.
62.
Stanovich, K. E., & Cunningham, A. E. (in press). Studying the consequences of literacy within a literate society: The cognitive correlates of print exposure. Memory and Cognition.
63.
Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (1989). Exposure to print and orthographic processing.Reading Research Quarterly,24, 402–433.
64.
Swanson, H. L. (1986). Do semantic memory deficiencies underlie disabled readers' encoding process?Journal of Experimental Child Psychology,41, 461–488.
65.
Vellutino, F. R. (1979). Dylexia: Theory and research.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
66.
Vogel, S. (1990). Gender differences in intelligence, language, visual-motor abilities, and academic achievement in students with learning disabilities: A review of the literature.Journal of Learning Disabilities,23, 44–52.
67.
Wagner, R. K., & Torgesen, J. K. (1987). The nature of phonological processing and its causal role in the acquisition of reading skills.Psychological Bulletin,101, 192–212.
68.
Warrington, E. K. (1967). The incidence of verbal disability associated with retardation reading (SIC).Neuropsychologica,5, 175–179.
Weller, C., & Strawser, S. (1987). Adaptive behavior of subtypes of learning disabled individuals.The Journal of Special Education,21, 101–115.
71.
Wood, F., Felton, R., Flower, L., & Naylor, C. (1991). Neurobehavioral definition of dyslexia. In D, D. Duane. & D. B. Gray (Eds.), The reading brain: The biological basis of dyslexia (pp. 1–26). Parkton, MD: Parkton, MD.
72.
Woodcock, R. W. (1987). Woodcock reading mastery tests-Revised.Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
