This article describes a theoretical model of reading disability that integrates a wide range of research findings in cognitive psychology, reading, and education across the age and grade span. The model shows how reading disability relates to normal reading acquisition, and includes four possible patterns of reading disability: nonalphabetic readers, compensatory readers, nonautomatic readers, and readers delayed in the acquisition of word-recognition skills. We compare our model to the models of other investigators and argue that our model is especially useful to practitioners. Finally, we discuss some of the educational implications of the model.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Adams, M. J. (1990). Beginning to read: Thinking and learning about print.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
2.
Adams, M. J., Allington, R. L., Chaney, J. H., Goodman, Y. M., Kapinus, B. A., McGee, L. M., Richgels, D. J., Schwartz, S. J., Shannon, P., Smitten, B., & Williams, J. P. (1991). Beginning to read: A critique by literacy professionals and a response by Marilyn Jager Adams.Reading Teacher,44, 370–395.
3.
Alexander, A. W., Andersen, H. G., Heilman, P. C., Voeller, K., & Torgesen, J. K. (1991). Phonological awareness training and remediation of analytic decoding deficits in a group of severe dyslexics.Annals of Dyslexia,41, 193–206.
4.
Alexander, P. A., & Judy, J. E. (1988). The interaction of domain-specific and strategic knowledge in academic performance.Review of Educational Research,58, 375–404.
5.
Anderson, R. C., Hiebert, E. H., Scott, J. A., & Wilkinson, I. A. G. (1985). Becoming a nation of readers: The report of the commission on reading.Champaign, IL: Center for the Study of Reading.
6.
Blachman, B. A. (1987). An alternative classroom reading program for learning disabled and other low-achieving children. In W. Ellis (Ed.), Intimacy with language: A forgotten basic in teacher education (pp. 49–55). Baltimore: Baltimore.
7.
Boder, E. (1973). Developmental dyslexia: A diagnostic approach based on three atypical reading-spelling patterns.Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology,15, 663–687.
8.
Bradley, L., & Bryant, P. E. (1983). Categorizing sounds and learning to read–A causal connection.Nature,301, 419–421.
9.
Byrne, B. (1992). Studies in the acquisition procedure for reading: Rationale, hypotheses, and data. In P, B. Gough., L, C. Ehri., & R. Treiman (Eds.), Reading acquisition (pp. 1–34). Hillsdale, NJ: Hillsdale, NJ.
10.
Byrne, B., & Ledez, J. (1986). Phonological awareness in reading-disabled adults.Australian Journal of Psychology,35, 185–197.
11.
Chall, J. (1967). Learning to read: The great debate.New York: McGraw-Hill.
12.
Chall, J. (1983). Stages of reading development.New York: McGraw-Hill.
13.
Chall, J., Jacobs, V. A., & Baldwin, L. E. (1990). The reading crisis: Why poor children fall behind.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
14.
Chan, C., Burtis, P. J., Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1992). Construction activity in learning from text.American Educational Research Journal,29, 97–118.
15.
Clay, M. M. (1979). The early detection of reading difficulties.Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
16.
Coles, G. S. (1987). The learning mystique: A critical look at “learning disabilities.”New York: Pantheon Books.
17.
Davidson, J. E., & Sternberg, R. J. (1984). The role of insight in intellectual giftedness.Gifted Child Quarterly,28, 58–64.
18.
Ehri, L. C. (1991). Learning to read and spell words. In L. Rieben & C. A. Perfetti (Eds.), Learning to read: Basic research and its implications (pp. 57–73). Hillsdale, NJ: Hillsdale, NJ.
19.
Ehri, L. C. (1992). Reconceptualizing the development of sight word reading and its relationship to recoding. In P, B. Gough., L, C. Ehri., & R. Treiman (Eds.), Reading acquisition (pp. 107–143). Hillsdale, NJ: Hillsdale, NJ.
20.
Frost, R. (1949). Complete poems of Robert Frost.New York: Holt.
21.
Garner, R. (1987). Metacognition and reading comprehension.Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
22.
Garner, R., Alexander, P. A., & Hare, V. C. (1991). Reading comprehension failure in children. In B, Y. L. Wong (Ed.), Learning about learning disabilities (pp. 283–307). San Diego: San Diego.
23.
Garner, R., & Reis, R. (1981). Monitoring and resolving comprehension obstacles: An investigation of spontaneous text lookbacks among upper-grade good and poor comprehenders.Reading Research Quarterly,16, 569–582.
24.
Goldenberg, C. (1992). The limits of expectations: A case for case knowledge about teacher expectancy effects.American Educational Research Journal,29, 517–544.
25.
Goswami, U., & Bryant, P. (1992). Rhyme, analogy, and children's reading. In P, B. Gough., L, C. Ehri., & R. Treiman (Eds.), Reading acquisition (pp. 49–63). Hillsdale, NJ: Hillsdale, NJ.
26.
Gough, P. B., & Juel, C. (1991). The first stages of word recognition. In L. Rieben & C. A. Perfetti (Eds.), Learning to read: Basic research and its implications (pp. 47–56). Hillsdale, NJ: Hillsdale, NJ.
27.
Hammill, D. D., Leigh, J. E., McNutt, G., & Larsen, S. C. (1981). A new definition of learning disabilities.Learning Disability Quarterly,4, 336–342.
28.
Hiebert, E. H., Colt, J. M., Catto, S. L., & Gury, E. C. (1992). Reading and writing of first-grade students in a restructured Chapter 1 program.American Educational Research Journal,29, 545–572.
29.
Katz, R. B. (1986). Phonological deficiencies in children with reading disability: Evidence from an object naming task.Cognition,22, 225–257.
30.
LaBerge, D., & Samuels, S. J. (1974). Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading.Cognitive Psychology,6, 293–323.
31.
Liberman, I. Y. (1989). Phonology and beginning reading revisited. In C. von Euler (Ed.), Wenner-Gren international symposium series: Brain and reading (pp. 207–220). Hampshire, England: Hampshire, England.
32.
Maclean, M., Bryant, P., & Bradley, L. (1987). Rhymes, nursery rhymes, and reading in early childhood.Merrill-Palmer Quarterly,33, 255–281.
33.
Mann, V. A., & Liberman, I. Y. (1984). Phonological awareness and verbal shortterm memory.Journal of Learning Disabilities,17, 592–599.
34.
Markman, E. M., & Gorin, L. (1981). Children's ability to adjust their standards for evaluating comprehension.Journal of Educational Psychology,83, 320–325.
35.
Mason, J. M. (1992). Reading stories to pre-literate children: A proposed connection to reading. In P, B. Gough., L, C. Ehri., & R. Treiman (Eds.), Reading acquisition (pp. 215–241). Hillsdale, NJ: Hillsdale, NJ.
36.
Morrison, F. J., & Manis, F. R. (1982). Cognitive processes and reading disability: A critique and proposal. In C, J. Brainerd. & M. I. Pressley (Eds.), Progress in cognitive development research (Vol. 2, pp. 59–93). New York: Springer-Verlag.
37.
Myers, M., & Paris, S. G. (1978). Children's metacognitive knowledge about reading.Journal of Educational Psychology,70, 680–690.
38.
Paris, S. G., Jacobs, J. E., & Cross, D. R. (1987). Toward an individualistic psychology of exceptional children. In J. Borkowski & J. Day (Eds.), Intelligence and cognition in special children: Perspectives on mental retardation, learning disabilities, and giftedness (pp. 1–49). New York: New York.
39.
Paris, S. G., & Lindauer, B. K. (1982). The development of cognitive skills during childhood. In B. Wolman (Ed.), Handbook of developmental psychology (pp. 333–349). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
40.
Perfetti, C. A. (1985). Reading ability.New York: Oxford University Press.
41.
Perfetti, C. A. (1992). The representation problem in reading acquisition. In P, B. Gough., L, C. Ehri., & R. Treiman (Eds.), Reading acquisition (pp. 145–174). Hillsdale, NJ: Hillsdale, NJ.
42.
Perfetti, C. A., Beck, I., Bell, L., & Hughes, C. (1987). Phonemic knowledge and learning to read are reciprocal: A longitudinal study of first grade children.Merrill-Palmer Quarterly,33, 283–319.
43.
Perfetti, C. A., & Lesgold, A. (1977). Discourse comprehension and sources of individual differences. In M. Just & P. Carpenter (Eds.), Cognitive processes in comprehension (pp. 141–183). Hillsdale, NJ: Hillsdale, NJ.
44.
Rapala, M. M., & Brady, S. (1990). Reading ability and short-term memory: The role of phonological processing.Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal,2, 1–25.
45.
Rumelhart, D. (1975). Notes on a schema for stories. In D, G. Bobrow. & A. Collins (Eds.), Representation and understanding: Studies in cognitive science (pp. 40–82). San Diego: San Diego.
46.
Shankweiler, D., & Crain, S. (1986). Language mechanisms and reading disorder: A modular approach.Cognition,24, 139–168.
47.
Shankweiler, D., Crain, S., Brady, S., & Macaruso, P. (1992). Identifying the causes of reading disability. In P, B. Gough., L, C. Ehri., & R. Treiman (Eds.), Reading acquisition (pp. 275–305). Hillsdale, NJ: Hillsdale, NJ.
48.
Smiley, S. S., Oakley, D. D., Worthen, D., Campione, J. C., & Brown, A. L. (1977). Recall of thematically relevant material by adolescent good and poor readers as a function of written versus oral presentation.Journal of Educational Psychology,69, 381–389.
49.
Snowling, M. (1980). The development of grapheme-phoneme correspondence in normal and dyslexic readers.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology,29, 294–305.
50.
Snowling, M. (1981). Phonemic deficits in developmental dyslexia.Psychological Research,43, 219–234.
51.
Spear, L. C., & Sternberg, R. J. (1987). An information-processing framework for understanding reading disability. In S. J. Ceci (Ed.), Handbook of cognitive, social, and neuropsychological aspects of learning disabilities (Vol. 2, pp. 3–31). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
52.
Stanovich, K. E. (1986). Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy.Reading Research Quarterly,21, 360–406.
53.
Stanovich, K. E. (1988). Explaining the differences between the dyslexic and the garden-variety poor reader: The phonological-core variable-difference model.Journal of Learning Disabilities,21, 590–604.
54.
Stanovich, K. E. (1989, June). Discrepancy definitions of reading disability: Has intelligence led us astray?Paper presented at the joint NICHD and IARLD Conference on Learning Disabilities, Ann Arbor, MI.
55.
Stanovich, K. E. (1990). Concepts in developmental theories of reading skill: Cognitive resources, automaticity, and modularity.Developmental Review,10, 72–100.
56.
Stanovich, K. E. (1992). Speculations on the causes and consequences of individual differences in early reading acquisition. In P, B. Gough., L, C. Ehri., & R. Treiman (Eds.), Reading Acquisition (pp. 307–342). Hillsdale, NJ: Hillsdale, NJ.
57.
Sternberg, R. J. (1985). Beyond IQ: A triarchic theory of human intelligence.New York: Cambridge University Press.
58.
Sternberg, R. J. (1986). Intelligence applied: Understanding and increasing your intellectual skills.San Diego: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich.
59.
Sternberg, R. J., & Wagner, R. K. (1982). Automatization failure in learning disabilities.Topics in Learning & Learning Disabilities,2, 1–11.
60.
Taylor, M. B., & Williams, J. P. (1983). Comprehension of learning disabled readers: Task and text variations.Journal of Educational Psychology,75, 584–601.
61.
Torgesen, J. K. (1977). Memorization processes in reading-disabled children.Journal of Educational Psychology,79, 571–578.
62.
Torgesen, J. K. (1991). Subtypes as prototypes: Extended studies of rationally defined extreme groups. In L. Feagons, E, J. Shaf., & L. J. Meltzer (Eds.), Subtypes of learning disabilities (pp. 229–246). Hillsdale, NJ: Hillsdale, NJ.
63.
Torgesen, J. K. (1993). Variations on theory in learning disabilities. In R. Lyon, D. Gray, N. Krasnegor, & J. Kavanagh (Eds.), Better understanding learning disabilities: Perspectives on classification, identification, and assessment and their implications for education and policy.Baltimore: Brooks.
64.
Tunmer, W. E. (1991). Phonological awareness and literacy acquisition. In L. Rieben & C. A. Perfetti (Eds.), Learning to read: Basic research and its implications (pp. 105–119). Hillsdale, NJ: Hillsdale, NJ.
65.
Vellutino, F. R. (1979). Dyslexia: Theory and research.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
66.
Vellutino, F. R., & Scanlon, D. M. (1987). Phonological coding, phonological awareness, and reading ability: Evidence from a longitudinal and experimental study.Merrill-Palmer Quarterly,33, 321–363.
67.
Vellutino, F. R., & Scanlon, D. M. (1991). The effects of instructional bias on word identification. In L. Rieben & C. A. Perfetti (Eds.), Learning to read: Basic research and its implications (pp. 189–203). Hillsdale, NJ: Hillsdale, NJ.
68.
Wagner, R. K., & Torgesen, J. K. (1987). The nature of phonological processing and its causal role in the acquisition of reading skills.Psychological Bulletin,101, 192–212.
69.
Wolf, M. (1984). Naming, reading, and the dyslexias: A longitudinal overview.Annals of Dyslexia,34, 87–115.
70.
Wolf, M. (1991). Naming speed and reading: The contribution of the cognitive neurosciences.Reading Research Quarterly,26, 123–141.
71.
Wolford, G., & Fowler, C. A. (1984). Differential use of partial information by good and poor readers.Developmental Review,6, 16–35.
72.
Wong, B. Y. L. (1991). The relevance of metacognition to learning disabilities. In B, Y. L. Wong (Ed.), Learning about learning disabilities (pp. 231–258). San Diego: San Diego.
73.
Wong, B. Y. L., & Wong, R. (1986). Study behavior as a function of metacognitive knowledge about critical task variables: An investigation of above average, average, and learning-disabled readers.Learning Disabilities Research,1, 101–111.
74.
Woodcock, R. W. (1987). Woodcock reading mastery tests-Revised.Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
75.
Worden, P. E. (1983). Memory strategy instruction with the learning disabled. In M. Pressley & J. R. Levin (Eds.), Cognitive strategies: Developmental, educational, and treatment-related issues (pp. 101–148). New York: New York.
