Referral-to-Placement Ratio: A Finding in Need of Reassessment?

Abstract

Previous research has reported that the number of evaluated children placed in special education is as high as three out of four. The purpose of the present study is to reassess, extend, and update referral-to-placement research. Subjects consisted of 236 predominantly white children referred for special education evaluation from 12 suburban and rural school districts. Of the 236 pupils referred, 128 were diagnosed as learning disabled (LD) by a multidisciplinary team (MDT). The 128 students identified as eligible for services for students with LD had a mean 1Q of 96.43 and a mean age of 10.2. The majority of the subjects were male (70%). The results suggest that the number of students referred who are actually placed is lower (approximately one out of two) than previously reported. It is concluded that further research is needed to verify the current referral-to-placement ratio and to explore the factors influencing this ratio.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Algozzine, B. , Christenson, S. , & Ysseldyke, J. (1982). Probabilities associated with the referral to placement process. Teacher Education and Special Education, 5, 19–23.

Algozzine, B. , Maheady, L. , Sacca, K.C. , O'Shea, L. , & O'Shea, D. (1990). Sometimes patent medicine works: A reply to Braaten, Kauffman, Braaten, Polsgrove, and Nelson. Exceptional Children, 56, 552–557.

Babbie, E. (1989). The practice of social research. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.

Braaten, S. , Kauffman, J.M. , Braaten, B. , Polsgrove, L. , & Nelson, C.M. (1988). The Regular Education Initiative: Patent medicine for behavioral disorders. Exceptional Children, 55, 21–27.

Clarizio, H. , & Phillips, S.E. (1986). Sex bias in the diagnosis of learning disabled students. Psychology in the Schools, 23, 44–52.

Furlong, M. , & Yanagida, E. (1985). Psychometric factors affecting multidisciplinary team identification of learning disabled children. Learning Disability Quarterly, 8, 37–44.

Furlong, M. (1988). An examination of an implementation of the simple difference score distribution model in learning disability identification. Psychology in the Schools, 25, 132–143.

Gresham, F.M. , Reschly, D.J. , & Carey, M.P. (1987). Teachers as “tests”: Classification accuracy and concurrent validation in the identification of learning disabled children. School Psychology Review, 16, 543–553.

Kauffman, J.M. , Braaten, S. , Nelson, C.M. , Polsgrove, L. , & Braaten, B. (1990). The Regular Education Initiative and patent medicine: A rejoinder to Algozzine, Maheady, Sacca, O'Shea, and O'Shea. Exceptional Children, 56, 558–560.

10.

Payette, K. , Clarizio, H. , Phillips, S.E. , & Bennett, D. (1991). A comparison of methods for determining LD eligibility: Effects on racial representation. Manuscript submitted for publication.

11.

Shaywitz, S. , Shaywitz, B. , Fletcher, J. , & Escobar, M. (1990). Prevalence of reading disability in boys and girls. Journal of the American Medical Association, 264, 998–1002.

12.

Shepard, L. (1982). Assessment of learning disabilities. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.

13.

Shinn, M. , Tindal, G. , & Spira, D. (1987). Special education referrals as an index of teacher tolerance: Are teachers imperfect tests?. Exceptional Children, 54, 32–40.

14.

U.S. Department of Education. (1991). Thirteenth annual report to Congress on the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Act. Washington, DC: Author.