In part because learning strategies are often taught in isolated resource settings outside of the contexts in which students with learning disabilities are expected to apply this knowledge, generalization has been a significant challenge to educators. To address this problem, an instructional model is proposed for integrating cognitive strategy instruction and content area instruction when teaching students in content area classes. Teacher-directed instructional procedures, cooperative learning, and direct explanation and dialectical strategy instruction are integrated into four key instructional processes: orienting, framing, applying, and extending. In this model, teacher-mediated instructional devices and routines used to teach content area subjects serve as a basis for teaching students to self-mediate parallel cognitive strategies and processes. The model is discussed in terms of its theoretical and philosophical orientations as manifested in its knowledge and instructional bases. A scenario is provided that depicts a social studies teacher implementing many of the principles and methods associated with the model.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Alexander, P.A., Schallert, D.L., & Hare, V.C. (1991). Coming to terms: How researchers in learning and literacy talk about knowledge. Review of Educational Research, 61, 315–343.
2.
Anderson, J.R. (1983). The architecture of cognition.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
3.
Anderson, T.H., & Armbruster, B.B. (1984). Studying. In P.D. Pearson (Ed.), Handbook of reading research.New York: Longman.
4.
Atkinson, R.C., & Raugh, M. (1985). An application of the mnemonic keyword method to the acquisition of a Russian vocabulary. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 104, 126–133.
5.
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory.Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
6.
Bergerud, D., Lovitt, T., & Horton, S. (1987). The effectiveness of textbook adaptations in life science for high school students with learning disabilities. Unpublished manuscript, The University of Washington.
7.
Bos, C.S., & Anders, P.L. (1990). Interactive teaching and learning: Instructional practices for teaching content and strategic knowledge. In B. Wong & M. Scruggs (Eds.), Intervention research in learning disabilities (pp. 116–185). New York: Springer-Verlag.
8.
Brandsford, J.D., & Johnson, M.K. (1972). Contextual prerequisites of comprehension and recall. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11, 717–726.
9.
Brandsford, J.D., Sherwood, R., Vye, N., & Rieser, J. (1986). Teaching and problem solving. American Psychologist, 41, 1078–1089.
10.
Brown, A.L. (1978). Knowing when, where, and how to remember: A problem of metacognition. In R. Glaser (Ed.), Advances in instructional psychology (Vol. 7, pp. 55–113). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
11.
Bulgren, J.A., Schumaker, J.B., & Deshler, D.D. (1988). Effectiveness of a concept teaching routine in enhancing the performance of LD students in secondary-level mainstream classes. Learning Disability Quarterly, 11, 3–17.
12.
Dansereau, D.F., & Holley, C.D. (1982). Development and evaluation of a text mapping strategy. In A. Flammer & W. Kintsch (Eds.), Discourse processing (pp. 536–554). Amsterdam: North Holland.
13.
Derry, S.J. (1990). Remediating academic difficulties through strategy training: The acquisition of useful knowledge. Remedial and Special Education, 11, (8), 19–31.
14.
DuCharme, C., Earl, J., & Poplin, M.S. (1989). The author mode: The constructivist view of the writing process. Learning Disability Quarterly, 12, 237–242.
15.
Ellis, E.S. (1986). The role of motivation and pedagogy on the generalization of cognitive strategy training. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 19, 66–70.
16.
Ellis, E.S. (1989). A metacognitive intervention for increasing class participation. Learning Disabilities Focus, 5, (1), 36–46.
17.
Ellis, E.S. (1990). What's so strategic about teaching teachers to teach strategies?. Teacher Education and Special Education, 13, (2), 59–62.
18.
Ellis, E.S. (in press). An instructional model for integrating content-area instruction with cognitive strategy instruction. Reading and Writing Quarterly: Overcoming Learning Difficulties.
19.
Ellis, E.S., Deshler, D.D., & Schumaker, J.B. (1989). Teaching learning disabled adolescents to generate and use task-specific strategies. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 22, 108–119.
20.
Ellis, E.S., Deshler, D.D., Schumaker, J.B., Lenz, B.K., & Clark, F.L. (1991). An instructional model for teaching learning strategies. Focus on Exceptional Children, 23, 1–24.
21.
Ellis, E.S., & Friend, P. (1991). The adolescent with learning disabilities. In B.Y.L. Wong (Ed.), Learning about learning disabilities (pp. 506–561). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
22.
Ellis, E.S., & Lenz, B.K. (1987). An analysis of the critical features of effective learning strategies. Focus on Learning Disabilities, 2, (2), 94–107.
23.
Ellis, E.S., & Lenz, B.K. (1990). Adaptive techniques for mediating content-area learning: Issues and research. Focus on Exceptional Children, 22, (9), 1–16.
24.
Ellis, E.S., & Sabornie, E.J. (1990). Strategy based instruction in content area classes: Social validity of six options and implications for designing instructional materials. Teacher Education and Special Education, 13, (2), 133–144.
25.
Gibbs, J. (1987). Tribes: A process for social development and cooperative learning.Santa Rosa, CA: Center Source Publications.
Harris, K., & Pressley, M. (1991). The nature of cognitive strategy instruction: Interactive strategy construction. Exceptional Children, 57, 392–404.
28.
Hart, L. (1983). Human brain and human learning.New York: Teacher's College Press.
29.
Hermann, B.A. (1988). Two approaches for helping poor readers become more strategic. The Reading Teacher, 42, 24–28.
30.
Hermann, B.A. (1990). Teaching preservice teachers how to model thought processes: Issues, problems, and procedures. Teacher Education and Special Education, 13, 78–81.
31.
Horton, S.V., & Lovitt, T.C. (1987). Information organization for secondary students: Study guides. Unpublished manuscript, University of Washington.
32.
Johnson, D.W., & Johnson, R.T. (1975). Learning together and alone.Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Jones, B.F., Palincsar, A.S., Ogle, D.S., & Carr, E.G. (1987). Strategic teaching and learning: Cognitive instruction in the content areas.Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
36.
Jones, B.F., Pierce, J., & Hunter, B. (1989). Teaching students to construct graphic representations. Educational Leadership, 46, 20–25.
37.
Kaman, M.P., & Wong, B.Y.L. (in press). Inducing adaptive self-coping statements in children with learning disabilities through self-instructional training. Journal of Learning Disabilities.
38.
Klausmeier, J.H. (1984). Conceptual learning and development. In R. Corsini (Ed.), Encyclopedia of psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 266–269). New York: Wiley.
39.
Klausmeier, J.H. (1990). Conceptualizing. In B.F. Jones & L. Idol (Eds.), Dimensions of thinking and cognitive instruction: Implications for educational reform (pp. 93–131). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
40.
Klausmeier, J.H., & Sipple, T.S. (1980). Learning and teaching process concepts: A strategy for testing applications for theory.New York: Academic Press.
41.
Koran, M.L., & Koran, J. (1980). Interaction of learner characteristics with pictorial adjuncts in learning from science text. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 1, 477–483.
42.
Kronick, D. (1988). New approaches to learning disabilities: Cognitive, metacognitive, and holistic.Philadelphia: Grune & Stratton.
43.
Lenz, B.K., Alley, G.R., & Schumaker, J.B. (1987). Activating the inactive learner: Advance organizers in the secondary content classroom. Learning Disability Quarterly, 10, 53–67.
44.
Lenz, B.K., Schumaker, J.B., & Deshler, D.D. (1991, April). Planning in the face of academic diversity: Whose questions should we be answering?Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association Conference, Chicago.
45.
Levin, J.R. (1981a). The mnemonic 80's: Keywords in the classroom. Educational Psychologist, 16, 65–82.
46.
Levin, J.R. (1981b). On functions of pictures in prose. In F.J. Pirozzolo & M.C. Wittrock (Eds.), Neuropsychological and cognitive processes in reading (pp. 203–228). New York: Academic Press.
47.
Levin, J.R. (1983). Pictorial strategies for school learning: Practical illustrations. In M. Pressley & J.R. Levin (Eds.), Cognitive strategy research: Educational applications (pp. 213–237). New York: Springer-Verlag.
48.
Mastropieri, M.A., Scruggs, T.E., McLoone, B., & Levin, J.R. (1985). Facilitating the acquisition of science classifications in learning disabled students. Learning Disability Quarterly, 8, 299–309.
49.
Meichenbaum, D. (1977). Cognitive behavior modification: An integrative approach.New York: Plenum Press.
50.
Meichenbaum, D. (1983). Teaching thinking: A cognitive-behavioral approach. In Interdisciplinary voices in learning disabilities and remedial education (pp. 1–28). Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
51.
Moshman, D. (1982). Exogenous, endogenous, and dialectical constructivism. Developmental Review, 2, 371–384.
52.
Moyer, J.C., Sowder, L., Threadgill-Sowder, J., & Moyer, M.B. (1984). Story problem formats: Drawn versus telegraphic. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 15, 342–351.
53.
Nagel, D.R., Schumaker, J.B., & Deshler, D.D. (1986). The learning strategies curriculum: The FIRST-letter mnemonic strategy.Lawrence, KS: Edge Enterprises.
54.
Niedelman, M. (1991). Problem solving and transfer. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 24, 322–329.
55.
Palincsar, A.M., & Brown, A.L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension fostering and monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1, 117–175.
56.
Poplin, M. (1988a). Holistic/constructivist principles of the teaching/learning process: Implications for the field of learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 21, 401–416.
57.
Poplin, M. (1988b). The reductionistic fallacy in learning disabilities: Replicating the past by reducing the present. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 21, 389–400.
58.
Pressley, M. (1983). Making meaning material easier to learn: Lessons from cognitive strategy research. In M. Pressley & J.R. Levin (Eds.), Cognitive strategy research: Educational applications (pp. 239–266). New York: Springer-Verlag.
59.
Pressley, M., Borkowski, J.G., & Schneider, W. (1989). Good information processing: What it is and what education can do to promote it. International Journal of Educational Research, 13, 857–867.
60.
Pressley, M., El-Dinary, P., Gaskins, I., Schuder, T., Bergman, J., Almasi, J., & Brown, R. (1991). Direct explanation done well: Transactional instruction of reading comprehension strategies. Unpublished manuscript, The University of Maryland.
61.
Pressley, M., Goodchild, F., Fleet, J., Zajchowski, R., & Evans, E.D. (1987). What is good strategy use and why is it hard to teach? An optimistic appraisal of the challenges associated with strategy instruction. Unpublished manuscript, Department of Psychology, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario.
62.
Pressley, M., Harris, K.R., & Marks, M.M. (in press). But good strategy instructors are constructivists!!Reading and Writing Quarterly: Overcoming Learning Difficulties.
63.
Pressley, M., Johnson, C.J., & Symons, S. (1987). Elaborating to learn and learning to elaborate. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 20, 76–91.
64.
Resnick, L. (1985). Education and learning to think. Special report prepared for the Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, National Research Council.
65.
Roehler, L.R., & Duffy, G.G. (1984). Direct explanation of comprehension processes. In G.G. Duffy, L.R. Roehler, & J. Mason (Eds.), Comprehension instruction: Perspectives and suggestions (pp. 265–280). New York: Longman.
66.
Salomon, G., & Perkins, D.N. (1989). Rocky roads to transfer: Rethinking mechanisms of a neglected phenomenon. Educational Psychologist, 24, 113–139.
67.
Schumaker, J., Denton, P.H., & Deshler, D.D. (1984). The paraphrasing strategy.Lawrence: The University of Kansas.
68.
Schumaker, J., & Deshler, D.D. (1988). Implementing the Regular Education Initiative in secondary schools: A different ball game. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 21, 36–42.
69.
Schumaker, J.B., Deshler, D.D., Alley, G.R., & Warner, M. (1983). Toward the development of a validated intervention model for LD adolescents. Exceptional Education Quarterly, 4, 45–74.
70.
Scruggs, T.E., Mastropieri, M.A., Levin, J.R., McLoone, B., Gaffney, J.S., & Prater, M.A. (1985). Increasing content-area learning: A comparison of nmemonic and visual-spatial direct instruction. Learning Disabilities Research, 1, 18–31.
71.
Sheinker, A., Sheinker, J.M., & Stevens, L.J. (1984). Cognitive strategies for teaching the mildly handicapped. Focus on Exceptional Children, 17, 1–15.
72.
Short, E.J., & Weissberg-Benchell, J.A. (1989). The triple alliance for learning: Cognition, metacognition, and motivation. In C.B. McCormick, G. Miller, & M. Pressley (Eds.), Cognitive strategy research: From basic research to educational applications (pp. 33–63). New York: Springer-Verlag.
73.
Sternburg, R.M. (1986). Intelligence, wisdom, and creativity: Three is better than one. Educational Psychologist, 21, 175–190.
74.
Strategic learning in the content areas. (1989). Madison: Wisconsin Department of Education.
75.
Torgesen, J., & Licht, B. (1983). The learning disabled child as an inactive learner: Retrospect and prospects. In J.D. McKinney & L. Feagans (Eds.), Topics in Learning Disabilities (Vol. 1, pp. 3–32). Rockville, MD: Aspen Press.
76.
Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Mind and society.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
77.
Wittrock, M.C. (1983). Generative reading comprehension.Boston: Ginn.
78.
Wong, B.Y.L. (1985a). Potential means of enhancing content skills acquisition in learning disabled adolescents. Focus on Exceptional Children, 17, (5), 1–8.
79.
Wong, B.Y.L. (1985b). Metacognition and learning disabilities. In T.G. Waller, D. Forrest-Pressley, & E. MacKinnon (Eds.), Metacognition, cognition and human performance (pp. 137–180). New York: Academic Press.
80.
Wong, B.Y.L. (1991). The relevance of metacognition to learning disabilities. In B.Y.L. Wong (Ed.), Learning about learning disabilities (pp. 232–261). San Diego: Academic Press.
81.
Wood, P., Bruner, J., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem-solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17, 89–100.
