This overview offers a perspective on the distinguishing characteristics, past and present, of the LD field in the United States. The discussion focuses on the complex relationships that exist among the social and political forces that have molded the field, advocacy, and research and teaching practices. It emphasizes the compelling need to establish clinical and scientific validation of LD, to preserve the hard-won achievements of advocacy.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Anderson, R.C., Hiebert, E.H., Scott, J.A., & Wilkinson, I.A.G. (1985). Becoming a nation of readers: The report of the Commission on Reading. Washington, DC: The National Institute of Education, U.S. Department of Education.
2.
Ayres, A.J. (1972). Sensory integration and learning disorders. Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services.
3.
Barringer, F. (1992, May 29). New census data reveal redistribution of poverty. New York Times, p. A14.
4.
Bateman, B. (1971). The essentials of teaching. San Rafael, CA: Dimensions.
5.
Berninger, V., Hart, T., Abbott, R., & Karovsky, P. (1992). Defining reading and writing disabilities with and without IQ: A flexible, developmental perspective. Learning Disability Quarterly, 15, 103–118.
6.
Bryan, T., Bay, M., & Donahue, M. (1988). Implications of the learning disabilities definition for the regular education initiative. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 21, 23–28.
Bush, W., & Giles, W. (1969). Aids to psycholinguistic teaching. Columbus, OH: Merrill.
9.
Carnine, D.W., & Kameenui, E.J. (1990). The General Education Initiative and children with special needs: A fake dilemma in the face of true problems. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 23, 141–144.
10.
Coles, G. (1987). The learning mystique: A critical look at “learning disabilities.”New York: Pantheon Books.
11.
Cratty, B. (1973). Intelligence in action. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
12.
DeFries, J.C., Olson, R.K., Pennington, B.F., & Smith, S.D. (1991). The Colorado Reading Project: An update. In D.D. Duane & D.B. Gray (Eds.), The reading brain: The biological basis of dyslexia (pp. 53–87). Parkton, MD: York Press.
13.
Doris, J. (1986). Learning disabilities. In S. Ceci (Ed.), Handbook of cognitive, social and neuropsychological aspects of learning disabilities (Vol. 1, pp. 3–53). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
14.
Doris, J. (in press). Some historical notes on the definition and prevalence of learning disabilities. In G.R. Lyon, D.B. Gray, J. Kavanagh, & N. Krasnegor (Eds.), Better understanding of learning disabilities: New views from research and their implications for education and public policy. Baltimore: Brookes.
15.
Drucker, P.F. (1989, May). How schools must change. Psychology Today, pp. 18–20.
16.
Duane, D.D., & Gray, D.B. (1991). The reading brain: The biological basis of dyslexia. Parkton, MD: York Press.
17.
Felton, R.H., & Wood, F.B. (1989). Cognitive deficits in reading disability and attention deficit disorder. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 22, 3–13.
18.
Fletcher, J.M., & Morris, R. (1986). Classification of disabled learners: Beyond exclusionary definitions. In S. Ceci (Ed.), Handbook of cognitive, social and neuropsychological aspects of learning disabilities (Vol. 1, pp. 55–80). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
19.
Foley, L. (1992). Washington update. LDA Newsbriefs, 27, 1.
20.
Francis, D.J., Fletcher, J.M., Steubing, K.K., Davidson, K.C., & Thompson, N.M. (1991). Analysis of change: Modeling individual growth. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 59, 27–37.
21.
Francis, D.J., Shaywitz, S.E., Steubing, K.K., Shaywitz, B.A., & Fletcher, J.M. (in press). The measurement of change: Assessing behavior over time and within a developmental context. In G.R. Lyon (Ed.), Frames of reference for the assessment of learning disabilities: New views on measurement issues. Baltimore: Brookes.
22.
Frank, A.R., (1973). Breaking down learning tasks: A sequence approach. Teaching Exceptional Children, 6, 16–19.
23.
Frostig, M., & Maslow, P. (1973). Learning problems in the classroom. New York: Grune & Stratton.
24.
Gerber, M., & Semmel, M.I. (1985). The microeconomics of referral and reintegration: A paradigm for evaluation of special education. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 11, 13–29.
25.
Graham, P.A. (1988, March). Revolution in pedagogy. Paper presented at the Wisconsin Symposium on Higher Education, LaCrosse, WI.
26.
Hallahan, D.P., Keller, C.E., McKinney, J.D., Lloyd, J.W., & Bryan, T. (1988). Examining the research base of the Regular Education Initiative: Efficacy studies and the Adaptive Learning Environments Model. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 21, 29–35.
27.
Hammill, D.D. (1990). On defining learning disabilities: An emerging consensus. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 23, 74–84.
28.
Hammill, D.D., Leigh, J., McNutt, G., & Larsen, S. (1981). A new definition of learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 4, 336–342.
29.
Heshusius, L. (1989). The Newtonian mechanistic paradigm, special education, and contours of alternatives: An overview. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 22, 403–415.
30.
Idol, L. (Ed.). (1989-90). Alternative service delivery models [Special series]. Remedial and Special Education, 10(6); 11(1).
31.
Interagency Committee on Learning Disabilities. (1987). Learning disabilities: A report to the U.S. Congress. Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of Health.
32.
Katz, M.B. (1987). Restructuring American education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Kavale, K., & Forness, S.R. (1985). The science of learning disabilities. San Diego: College-Hill.
35.
Kavale, K., & Nye, C. (1981). Identification criteria for learning disabilities: A survey of the research literature. Learning Disability Quarterly, 4, 383–388.
36.
Kavanagh, J.F., & Truss, T.J. (Eds.). (1988). Learning disabilities: Proceedings of the national conference. Parkton, MD: York Press.
37.
Kennedy, M.M. (1987). Inexact sciences: Professional education and the development of expertise (Issue Paper 87-2). East Lansing, MI: The National Center for Research on Teacher Education.
38.
Keogh, B. (1988). Improving services for problem learners: Rethinking and restructuring. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 21, 19–22.
39.
Keogh, B. (1993). Linking purpose and practice: Social/political and developmental perspectives on classification. In G.R. Lyon, D.B. Gray, J. Kavanagh, & N. Krasnegor (Eds.), Better understanding of learning disabilities: New views from research and their implications for education and public policy (pp. 311–323). Baltimore: Brookes.
40.
Kephart, N. (1971). The slow learner in the classroom. Columbus, OH: Merrill.
41.
Kirk, S., & Bateman, B. (1962). Diagnosis and remediation of learning disabilities. Exceptional Children, 29, 73–78.
42.
Kirk, S., & Kirk, W.D. (1971). Psycholinguistic learning disabilities: Diagnosis and remediation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
43.
Kozol, J.K. (1991). Savage inequalities: Children in America's schools. New York: Crown.
44.
Kronick, D. (1976). Three families. San Rafael, CA: Academic Therapy Publications.
45.
Kronick, D. (1990). Holism and empiricism as complementary paradigms. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 23, 5–10.
Liberman, I.Y., Shankweiler, D., & Liberman, A. (1989). The alphabetic principle and learning to read. In D. Shankweiler & I.Y. Liberman (Eds.), Phonology and reading disability: Solving the reading puzzle (pp. 1–33). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
48.
Lubs, H.A., Duara, R., Levin, B., Jallad, B., Lubs, M., Rabin, M., Kushch, A., & Gross-Glenn, K. (1991). Dyslexia subtypes: Genetics, behavior, and brain imaging. In D.D. Duane & D.B. Gray (Eds.), The reading brain: The biological basis of dyslexia (pp. 89–117). Parkton, MD: York Press.
49.
Lyon, G.R. (1987). Learning disabilities research: False starts and broken promises. In S. Vaughn & C. Bos (Eds.), Research in learning disabilities: Issues and future directions (pp. 69–85). Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
50.
Lyon, G.R. (1989). IQ is irrelevant to the definition of learning disabilities: A position in search of logic and data. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 22, 504–506, 512.
51.
Lyon, G.R. (1991). Research in learning disabilities (Tech. Rep.). Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of Child Health and Human Development.
52.
Lyon, G.R. (in press). Frames of reference for the assessment of learning disabilities: New views on measurement issues. Baltimore: Brookes.
53.
Lyon, G.R., Gray, D.B., Kavanagh, J., & Krasnegor, N. (Eds.). (1993). Better understanding of learning disabilities: New views from research and their implications for education and public policy. Baltimore: Brookes.
54.
Lyon, G.R., & Moats, L.C. (1988). Critical conditions in instruction of the learning disabled. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 56, 830–835.
55.
Lyon, G.R., Vaasen, M., & Toomey, F. (1989). Teachers' perceptions of their undergraduate and graduate preparation. Teacher Education and Special Education, 12, 164–169.
56.
Mercer, C.D., Hughes, C., & Mercer, A.R. (1985). Learning disabilities definitions used by state education departments. Learning Disability Quarterly, 8, 45–55.
57.
Mercer, C.D., King-Sears, P., & Mercer, A.R. (1990). Learning disabilities definitions and criteria used by state education departments. Learning Disability Quarterly, 13, 141–152.
58.
Moats, L.C. (in press-a). Assessment of spelling in learning disabilities research. In G.R. Lyon (Ed.), Frames of reference for the assessment of learning disabilities: New views on measurement issues. Baltimore: Brookes.
59.
Moats, L.C. (in press-b). Spelling development and spelling disability. Parkton, MD: York Press.
60.
Morris, R. (1988). Classification of learning disabilities: Old problems and new approaches. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 56, 789–794.
61.
Morris, R. (1993). Issues in empirical versus clinical identification of learning disabilities. In G.R. Lyon, D.B. Gray, J. Kavanagh, & N. Krasnegor (Eds.), Better understanding learning disabilities: New views from research and their implications for education and public policy (pp. 73–93). Baltimore: Brookes.
62.
National Advisory Committee on Handicapped Children. (1968). Special education for handicapped children (First Annual Report). Washington, DC: Department of Health, Education, & Welfare.
63.
National Joint Committee on Learning Disabilities. (1988). [Letter to NJCLD member organizations].
64.
Nolen, P.A., McCutchen, D., & Berninger, V. (1990). Ensuring tomorrow's literacy: A shared responsibility. Journal of Teacher Education, 41, 63–72.
65.
Opp, G. (1992). A German perspective on learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 25, 351–360.
66.
Poplin, M.S. (1984). Toward a holistic view of persons with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 7, 290–294.
67.
Rack, J.P., Snowling, M.J., & Olson, R.K. (1991). The nonword reading deficit in developmental dyslexia: A review. Reading Research Quarterly, 27, 28–53.
68.
Reid, D.K., & Stone, A. (1991). Why is cognitive instruction effective? Underlying learning mechanisms. Remedial and Special Education, 12(3), 8–19.
69.
Reynolds, C.R. (1984-85). Critical measurement issues in learning disabilities. The Journal of Special Education, 18, 451–475.
70.
Ryan, A.G., & Price, L. (1992). Adults with LD in the 1990s. Intervention in School and Clinic, 28, 6–20.
71.
Sarason, S.B. (1990). The predictable failure of educational reform. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
72.
Senf, G.M. (1981). Issues surrounding the diagnosis of learning disabilities: Child handicap vs. the failure of the child-school interaction. In T.R. Kratochwill (Ed.), Advances in school psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 88–131). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
73.
Senf, G.M. (1986). Learning disabilities research in sociological and scientific perspective. In J.K. Torgesen & B.Y.L. Wong (Eds.), Psychological and educational perspectives on learning disabilities (pp. 27–53). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
74.
Senf, G.M. (1987). Learning disabilities as a sociological sponge: Wiping up life's spills. In S. Vaughn & C.S. Bos (Eds.), Research in learning disabilities: Issues and future directions (pp. 87–101). Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
75.
Shaywitz, B., Shaywitz, S., Liberman, I., Fletcher, J., Shankweiler, D., Duncan, J., Katz, L., Liberman, A., Francis, D., Dreyer, L., Crain, S., Brady, S., Fowler, A., Kier, L., Rosenfield, N., Gore, J., & Makuch, R. (1991). Neurolinguistic and biological mechanisms in dyslexia. In D.D. Duane & D.B. Gray (Eds.), The reading brain: The biological basis of dyslexia (pp. 27–52). Parkton, MD: York Press.
76.
Shaywitz, S.E., Escobar, M.D., Shaywitz, B.A., Fletcher, J.M., & Makuch, R. (1992). Evidence that dyslexia may represent the lower tail of a normal distribution of reading ability. New England Journal of Medicine, 326, 145–150.
77.
Shaywitz, S.E., Shaywitz, B.A., Fletcher, J.M., & Escobar, M.D. (1990). Prevalence of reading disability in boys and girls: Results of the Connecticut longitudinal study. Journal of the American Medical Association, 264, 998–1002.
78.
Siegel, E. (1972). Task analysis and effective teaching. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 5, 519–532.
79.
Siegel, L.S. (1989). IQ is irrelevant to the definition of learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 22, 469–478.
80.
Stanovich, K. (1991). Discrepancy definitions of reading disability: Has intelligence led us astray?Reading Research Quarterly, 26, 7–29.
81.
Stanovich, K. (1993). The construct validity of discrepancy definitions of reading disability. In G.R. Lyon, D.B. Gray, J. Kavanagh, & N. Krasnegor (Eds.), Better understanding learning disabilities: New views from research and their implications for education and public policy (pp. 273–307). Baltimore: Brookes.
82.
Torgesen, J. (1986). Learning disabilities theory: Its current state and future prospects. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 19, 385–448.
83.
Torgesen, J. (1993). Variations on theory in learning disabilities. In G.R. Lyon, D.B. Gray, J. Kavanagh, & N. Krasnegor (Eds.), Better understanding of learning disabilities: New views from research and their implications for education and public policy (pp. 153–170). Baltimore: Brookes.
84.
U.S. Department of Education. (1989). To assure the free appropriate public education of all handicapped children: Eleventh report to Congress on the implementation of the Education of the Handicapped Act. Washington, DC: Department of Education.
85.
U.S. Office of Education. (1977). Definition and criteria for defining students as learning disabled. Federal Register, 42:250, p. 65083, Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
86.
Vaughn, S., & Bos, C. (1987). Research in learning disabilities: Issues and future directions. Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
87.
Vellutino, F., & Scanlon, D.M. (1987). Phonological coding, phonological awareness, and reading ability: Evidence from a longitudinal and experimental study. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 33, 321–363.
88.
Will, M.C. (1986). Educating children with learning problems: A shared responsibility. Exceptional Children, 52, 411–415.
89.
Worrall, R.S. (1990). Detecting health fraud in the field of learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 23, 207–212.
90.
Ysseldyke, J.E., & Algozzine, B. (1983). LD or not LD: That's not the question!Journal of Learning Disabilities, 16, 29–31.
91.
Zigmond, N. (1993). Learning disabilities from an educational perspective. In G.R. Lyon, D.B. Gray, J. Kavanagh, & N. Krasnegor (Eds.), Better understanding learning disabilities: New views from research and their implications for education and public policy (pp. 251–272). Baltimore: Brookes.
92.
Zigmond, N., & Baker, J. (1990). Mainstreaming experiences for learning disabled students: A preliminary report. Exceptional Children, 57, 176–185.
