CLD Research Committee:Smith, D.D., Deshler, D., Hallahan, D., Lovitt, T., Robinson, S., Voress, J., & Ysseldyke, J. (1984). Minimum standards for the description of subjects in learning disabilities research reports. Learning Disability Quarterly, 7(3), 221–225.
2.
Hammill, D.D. (1990). On defining learning disabilities: An emerging consensus. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 23, 74–84.
3.
Hammill, D.D., Bryant, B.R., Brown, L., Dunn, C., & Marten, A. (1989). How replicable is current LD research? A follow-up to the CLD Research Committee's recommendations. Learning Disability Quarterly, 12(3), 174–179.
4.
Lessen, E., Dudzinski, M., Karsh, K., & Van Acker, R. (1989). A survey of ten years of academic intervention research with learning disabled students: Implications for research and practice. LD Focus, 4(2), 106–122.
Mercer, C.D., King-Sears, P., & Mercer, A. (1990). Learning disabilities definitions and criteria used by state education departments. Learning Disability Quarterly, 13(2), 141–152.
7.
Parker, R.M. (1990). Power, control, and validity in research. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 23, 613–620.
8.
Rivers, D., & Smith, T.E.C. (1988). Traditional eligibility criteria for identifying students as specific learning disabled. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 21, 642–644.
9.
Smith, D.D., Deshler, D., Hallahan, D., Lovitt, T., Robinson, S., Voress, J., & Ysseldyke, J. (1984). Minimum standards for the description of subjects in learning disabilities research reports. Learning Disability Quarterly, 7, 221–225.