An Examination of Phonemic Processing Abilities in Children During Their First-Grade Year

Abstract

The present study examined the development of reading and phonological processing abilities of 209 first graders (118 males, 91 females; mean age = 86.7 months) assessed during the first and last quarters of their first-grade year. The children were arranged into three different groups based on their Time 2 reading and intelligence data (children with and without reading disabilities, and “garden-variety” poor readers). Analyses indicated that the children with reading disabilities and the garden-variety poor readers did not differ significantly on many of the tasks, but both performed differently than the children without reading disabilities. Developmental analyses indicated that all three groups increased their reading and phonological skills; however, the gap between the performance of the children without reading disabilities and the other two groups widened from Time 1 to Time 2. The most important finding of the present study concerned the classification results of the discriminant analysis, which correctly identified the group membership of 207 of the 209 children (99.04% correct).

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bradley, L. , & Bryant, P. (1985). Rhyme and reason in reading and spelling. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

Brady, S. , Poggie, E. , & Rapala, M.M. (1989). Speech repetition abilities in children who differ in reading skill. Language and Speech, 32, 109–122.

Brady, S. , Shankweiler, D. , & Mann, V. (1983). Speech perception and memory coding in relation to reading ability. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 35, 345–367.

Byrne, B. , & Shea, P. (1979). Semantic and phonetic memory codes in beginning readers. Memory and Cognition, 7, 333–338.

Dunn, L.M. (1981). Peabody picture vocabulary test-Revised. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.

Fox, B. , & Routh, D.K. (1983). Reading disability, phonemic analysis, and dysphonetic spelling: A follow-up study. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 12, 28–32.

Godfrey, J.J. , Syrdal-Lasky, A.K. , Millay, K.K. , & Knox, C.M. (1981). Performance of dyslexic children on speech perception tests. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 32, 401–424.

Gough, P.B. , & Tunmer, W.E. (1986). Decoding, reading, and reading disability. Remedial and Special Education, 7(1), 6–10.

Helfgott, J.A. (1976). Phonemic segmentation and blending skills of kindergarten children: Implications for beginning reading acquisition. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 1, 157–169.

10.

Hurford, D.P. (1990). Training phonemic segmentation ability with a phonemic discrimination intervention in second- and third-grade children with reading disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 23, 564–569.

11.

Hurford, D.P. (1991). The possible use of IBM-compatible computers and digital-to-analog conversion to assess children for reading disabilities and to increase their phonemic awareness. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 23, 319–323.

12.

Hurford, D.P. , Gilliland, C. , & Ginavan, S. (1992). Examination of the intrasyllable phonemic discrimination deficit in children with reading disabilities. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 17, 83–88.

13.

Hurford, D.P. , & Sanders, R.E. (1990). Assessment and remediation of a phonemic discrimination deficit in reading disabled second- and fourth-graders. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 50, 396–415.

14.

Hurford, D.P. , & Shedelbower, A. (in press). The relationship between discrimination and memory ability in children with reading disabilities. Contemporary Educational Psychology.

15.

Liberman, I.Y. , Shankweiler, D. , Liberman, A.M. , Fowler, C. , & Fischer, F.W. (1977). Phonetic segmentation and recoding in the beginning reader. In A.S. Reber & D. Scarborough (Eds.), Toward a psychology of reading: The proceedings of the CUNY conference (pp. 207–225). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

16.

Mann, V.A. (1984). Longitudinal prediction and prevention of early reading difficulty. Annals of Dyslexia, 34, 117–136.

17.

Mann, V.A. , & Liberman, I.Y. (1984). Phonological awareness and verbal short-term memory. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 17, 592–599.

18.

Mann, V.A. , Liberman, I.Y. , & Shankweiler, D. (1980). Children's memory for sentences and word strings in relation to reading ability. Memory and Cognition, 8, 329–335.

19.

Siegel, L.S. (1988). Evidence that IQ scores are irrelevant to the definition and analysis of reading disability. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 42, 201–215.

20.

Siegel, L.S. (1989). IQ is irrelevant to the definition of learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 22, 469–478.

21.

Stanovich, K.E. (1986). Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 21, 360–407.

22.

Stanovich, K.E. (1988). Explaining the differences between the dyslexic and the garden-variety poor reader: The phonological-core variable-difference model. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 21, 590–612.

23.

Torgesen, J.K. (1989). Why IQ is irrelevant to the definition of learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 22, 484–486.

24.

Wagner, R.K. , & Torgesen, J.K. (1987). The nature of phonological processing and its causal role in the acquisition of reading skills. Psychological Bulletin, 101, 192–212.

25.

Woodcock, R.W. (1987). Woodcock reading mastery tests-Revised. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.

26.

Zifcak, M. (1981). Phonological awareness and reading acquisition. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 6, 117–126.