Instructional Practices in Mainstreamed Secondary Classrooms

Abstract

This study examined the skills of secondary students that teachers considered necessary for success in mainstreamed regular education classrooms and intervention strategies teachers would be willing to use. Teachers (N=89) from three high schools rated the importance of 14 student skills and the reasonability of 35 intervention strategies. Student skills deemed important included following directions, coming to class prepared with materials, using class time wisely, and making up assignments and tests. Factor analysis of intervention strategy results revealed seven factors: using supplemental resources; simplifying instruction; providing support and extra instructional cues; enhancing classroom behavior management; facilitating grade improvement; modifying learning environment; and teaching study skills and providing a positive, cooperative learning environment. Secondary teachers appear to prefer intervention strategies that they can implement in their own classroom, that can apply to all students, and that require little extra time.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Baker, J. , & Zigmond, J. (1990). Are regular education classes equipped to accommodate students with learning disabilities? Exceptional Children, 56, 515–526.

Bickel, W.E. , & Bickel, D.D. (1986). Effective schools, classrooms, and instruction: Implications for special education. Exceptional Children, 56, 489–500.

Brophy, J.E. , & Good, T.L. (1986). Teacher behavior and student achievement. In W.C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook on research on teaching (pp. 328–375). New York: Macmillan.

Deshler, D.D. , & Schumaker, J.D. (1986). Learning strategies: An instructional alternative for low-achieving adolescents. Exceptional Children, 52, 563–590.

Donaldson, R. , & Christiansen, J. (1990). Consultation and collaboration: A decision-making model. Teaching Exceptional Children, 22(2), 22–25.

Gersten, R. , & Woodward, J. (1990). Rethinking the regular education initiative: Focus on the classroom teacher. Remedial and Special Education, 11(3), 7–16.

Heron, T.E. , & Harris, K.C. (1987). The educational consultant: Helping professionals, parents, and mainstreamed students (2nd ed.). Austin, TX: PRO-ED.

Idol, L. , Paolucci-Whitcomb, P. , & Nevin, A. (1986). Collaborative consultation. Austin, TX: PRO-ED.

Jenkins, J.R. , & Heinen, A. (1989). Students' preferences for service delivery: Pull-out, in-class, or integrated models. Exceptional Children, 55, 516–623.

10.

Johnson, L.J. , & Pugach, M.C. (1990). Classroom teachers' views of intervention strategies for learning and behavior problems: Which are reasonable and how frequently are they used? The Journal of Special Education, 24, 69–84.

11.

Lerner, J.W. (1985). Learning disabilities: Theories, diagnosis, and teaching strategies. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

12.

Madden, N.A. , & Slavin, R.E. (1983). Mainstreaming students with mild handicaps: Academic and social outcomes. Review of Educational Research, 53, 519–569.

13.

Rich, H.L. , & Ross, S.M. (1989). Students' time on learning tasks in special education. Exceptional Children, 55, 508–515.

14.

Rosenshine, B. (1983). Teaching functions in instructional programs. Elementary School Journal, 83, 335–351.

15.

Rosenshine, B. , & Stevens, R. (1986). Teaching functions. In M.C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook on research on teaching (pp. 376–391). New York: Macmillan.

16.

Sasso, G.M. (1988). Service arrangements. In K.A. Kavale , & M. Bender (Eds.), Handbook of learning disabilities, Volume III: Programs and practices (pp. 85–102). Austin, TX: PRO-ED.

17.

Schumaker, J.B. , & Deshler, D.D. (1988). Implementing the Regular Education Initiative in secondary schools: A different ball game. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 21, 36–42.

18.

Singer, J.D. , & Butler, J. A. (1987). The Education for All Handicapped Children Act: Schools as agents of social reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57, 125–152.

19.

Wang, M.C. , & Birch, J.W. (1984). Effective special education in regular classes. Exceptional Children, 50, 391–398.

20.

Wang, M.C. , Nojan, M. , Strom, C.D. , & Walberg, J.J. (1984). The utility of degree of implementation measures in program implementation and evaluation research. Curriculum Inquiry, 14, 249–286.

21.

Wang, M.C. , & Reynolds, M.C. (1985). Avoiding the “Catch 22” in special education reform. Exceptional Children, 51, 497–502.

22.

West, J.F. , & Idol, L. (1990). Collaborative consultation in the education of mildly handicapped and at-risk students. Remedial and Special Education, 11(1), 22–31.

23.

Will, M. (1986). Educating students with learning problems—A shared responsibility. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education and Rehabilitation Services.