Similarities in the Social Competencies of Learning Disabled and Low Achieving Elementary School Children

Abstract

This study sought to examine distinctions in social competencies between children with learning disabilities (LD) and other children who also experience academic difficulties. Eighty-five children with LD (54 male, 31 female) in Grades 3 through 6 from a large urban school district were compared to a group of low achieving (LA) peers matched on achievement as well as sex, race, and grade. The samples were 42% black, 39% Hispanic, and 19% Anglo. Both groups completed two self-concept questionnaires, a loneliness scale, and a measure of their social relationships outside of school. In addition, their classmates completed a peer rating scale and their teachers completed two ratings of the child's social skills. The results indicated that children with LD and LA children were comparable on most measures, although children with LD reported themselves as being less lonely than LA children. In addition, regular-class children rated children with LD as more likable than LA children. The results highlight similarities in the social competencies of children with LD and LA children and suggest that special education classes may offer some social advantages to children with mild handicaps.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Asher, S.R. , Hymel, S. , & Renshaw, P.D. (1984). Loneliness in children. Child Development, 55, 1456–1464.

Bender, W.N. , Wyne, M.D. , Stuck, G.B. , & Bailey, D.B., Jr. (1984). Relative peer status of learning disabled, educable mentally handicapped, low achieving, and normally achieving children. Child Study Journal, 13, 209–216.

Bryan, T. (1974). Peer popularity of LD children. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 7, 31–35.

Bryan, T.H. , & Bryan, J.H. (1978). Social interactions of learning disabled children. Learning Disability Quarterly, 1, 33–38.

Bursuck, W.D. (1983). Sociometric status, behavior ratings and social knowledge of learning disabled and low achieving students. Learning Disability Quarterly, 6, 329–338.

Bursuck, W. (1989). A comparison of students with learning disabilities to low achieving and higher achieving students on three dimensions of social competence. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 22, 188–194.

Cadwell, J. , & Pullis, M. (1983). Assessing changes in the meaning of children's behavior: Factorial invariance of teachers' temperament ratings. Journal of Educational Psychology, 75, 553–560.

Coleman, J.M. , & Minnett, A.M. (1992). Learning disabilities and social competence: A social ecological perspective. Exceptional Children, 59, 234–246.

Garrett, M.K. , & Crump, W.D. (1980). Peer acceptance, teacher preference, and self-appraisal of social status among learning disabled students. Learning Disability Quarterly, 3, 42–47.

10.

Glass, G.V. (1981). Meta-analysis in social research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

11.

Gottman, J.M. , Gonso, J. , & Rasmussen, B. (1975). Social interaction, social competence, and friendship in children. Child Development, 46, 709–718.

12.

Green, K.D. , Forehand, R. , Beck, S.J. , & Vosk, B. (1980). An assessment of the relationship among measures of children's social competence and children's academic development. Child Development, 51, 1149–1156.

13.

Gresham, F.M. , & Reschly, D.J. (1986). Social skill deficits and low peer acceptance of mainstreamed learning disabled children. Learning Disability Quarterly, 9, 23–32.

14.

Harter, S. (1982). Developmental perspectives on the self system. In E.M. Hetherington (Ed.) & P.H. Mussen (Series Ed.), Handbook of child psychology: Socialization, personality, and social development (Vol. 4, pp. 275–386). New York: Wiley.

15.

Hartup, W.W. (1983). Peer relations. In E.M. Hetherington (Ed.) & P.H. Mussen (Series Ed.), Handbook of child psychology: Socialization, personality, and social development (Vol. 4, pp. 103–196). New York: Wiley.

16.

Interagency Committee on Learning Disabilities. (1987). Learning disabilities: A report to Congress. Washington, DC: Author.

17.

Kistner, J.A. , & Osborne, M. (1987). A longitudinal study of LD children's self-evaluations. Learning Disability Quarterly, 10, 258–266.

18.

LaGreca, A.M. , & Stone, W.L. (1990). LD status and achievement: Confounding variables in the study of children's social status, self-esteem, and behavioral functioning. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 23, 483–490.

19.

Marsh, H.W. , & Parker, J.W. (1984). Determinants of student self-concept: Is it better to be a relatively large fish in a small pond even if you don't learn to swim as well? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47(1), 213–231.

20.

McKinney, J. , McClure, S. , & Feagans, L. (1982). Classroom behavior of the learning disabled child. Learning Disability Quarterly, 5, 45–52.

21.

Oden, S. , & Asher, S. (1977). Coaching children in social skills for friendship making. Child Development, 48, 495–506.

22.

Pullis, M. (1985). Temperament characteristics of LD students and their impact on decisions made by resource and mainstream teachers. Learning Disability Quarterly, 8, 104–123.

23.

Pullis, M. , & Cadwell, J. (1982). The influence of children's temperament characteristics on teachers' decision strategies. American Educational Research Journal, 19, 165–181.

24.

Sater, G.M. , & French, D.C. (1989). A comparison of the social competencies of learning disabled and low achieving elementary-aged children. The Journal of Special Education, 23, 29–42.

25.

Thomas, A. , & Chess, S. (1977). Temperament and development. New York: Bruner/Mazel.

26.

Wylie, R.C. (1989). Measures of self-concept. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.