Learning disabilities (LD) has never been officially recognized as a category of special education in New Zealand. This article discusses the main reasons for the rejection of the LD category. The education system in New Zealand is described, and the nature of special education is outlined to provide a context for considering LD. Attempts by the parent group SPELD (New Zealand Federation of Specific Learning Disabilities Associations) to have “specific learning disabilities” (SLD) recognized in legislation are discussed, along with reasons for the rejection of these attempts by state education officials. It is concluded that LD/SLD will never be recognized as such in New Zealand. The needs of students with LD may potentially be met by new policies for “high incidence” special needs. But teachers' lack of skills and strategies for working with a range of learning difficulties is seen as an impediment to students with LD being adequately helped in the foreseeable future.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Algozzine, B., & Ysseldyke, J.E. (1983). Learning disabilities as a subset of school failure: The oversophistication of a concept. Exceptional Children, 50, 242–246.
2.
Algozzine, B., & Ysseldyke, J.E. (1986). The future of the LD field: Screening and diagnosis. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 19, 394–398.
3.
Arter, J.A., & Jenkins, J.R. (1979). Differential-diagnosis-prescriptive teaching: A critical appraisal. Review of Educational Research, 49, 517–555.
4.
Ballard, K. (1987). Assessment: Its role in the education of exceptional children. In D. Mitchell & N. Singh (Eds.), Exceptional children in New Zealand (pp. 177–187). Palmerston North, New Zealand: Dunmore Press.
5.
Beale, I.L., & Corballis, M.C. (no date). Submission on the Education (Specific Learning Disabilities) Amendment. Unpublished manuscript, Department of Psychology, University of Auckland, New Zealand.
6.
Brice, C.P. (1986). Private Member's bill: Sponsored by Mrs. Kathy O'Regan. Unpublished memorandum to the Minister of Education, Department of Education, Wellington, New Zealand.
7.
Brown, D.F. (1986). The Education (Specific Learning Disabilities) Amendment. Unpublished memorandum to the Minister of Education, Department of Education, Wellington, New Zealand.
8.
Brown, D.F. (1988, May). The Director of Special Education's invited address to the annual meeting of the New Zealand Federation of Specific Learning Disabilities Associations, New Plymouth.
9.
Cameron-Lewis, M. (1991, August). Working together---Bridging the gaps. Paper presented to the Roy McKenzie Foundation Seminar on Specific Learning Disabilities, Wellington, New Zealand.
10.
Chapman, J.W. (1985, May). Self-concept and learning disabilities SPELD out. Paper presented at the annual conference of the New Zealand Federation of Specific Learning Disabilities, Palmerston North, New Zealand.
11.
Chapman, J.W. (1988). Education (Specific Learning Disabilities) Amendment Bill. Unpublished notes from oral evidence (Submission No. 1113) presented to the Parliamentary Select Committee on Education and Science, New Zealand House of Representatives, Wellington.
12.
Chapman, J.W. (1989, May). Programmes for learning disabled students in Canada: Implications for New Zealand. Paper presented at the annual conference of the New Zealand Federation of Specific Learning Disabilities Associations, Oamaru, New Zealand.
13.
Chapman, J.W., St. George, R., & van Kraayenoord, C.E. (1984). Identification of “learning disabled” pupils in a New Zealand Form 1 sample. Australia and New Zealand Journal of Developmental Disabilities, 10, 141–149.
14.
Chapman, J.W., & Tunmer, W.E. (1991). Recovering reading recovery. Australia and New Zealand Journal of Developmental Disabilities, 17, 59–71.
15.
Clay, M.M. (1985). The early detection of reading difficulties (3rd ed.). Auckland, New Zealand: Heinemann.
16.
Clay, M.M. (1987a). Implementing reading recovery: Systematic adaptations to an educational innovation. New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies, 22, 35–58.
17.
Clay, M.M. (1987b). Learning to be learning disabled. New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies, 22, 155–173.
18.
Clay, M.M. (1988). Education (Specific Learning Disabilities) Amendment Bill. Unpublished notes from oral evidence (Submission No. 1310) presented to the Parliamentary Select Committee on Education and Science, New Zealand House of Representatives, Wellington.
19.
Coles, G.S. (1978). The learning-disabilities test battery: Empirical and social issues. Harvard Educational Review, 48, 313–340.
20.
Department of Education. (1987). The draft review of special education.Wellington, New Zealand: Author.
21.
Department of Education. (1988). Education statistics of New Zealand 1988.Wellington, New Zealand: Author.
22.
Education Act, England and Wales, 1981.
23.
Education Act, New Zealand, 1964, No. 135.
24.
Education Act, New Zealand, 1989, No. 80.
25.
Education Amendment Act (No. 2), New Zealand, 1987, No. 177.
26.
Education (Specific Learning Disabilities) Amendment Bill, New Zealand, 1986.
27.
Farrald, R.R., & Schamber, R.G. (1973). A diagnostic and prescriptive technique: Handbook 1: A mainstream approach to identification, assessment and amelioration of learning disabilities.Sioux Falls, SD: Adapt Press.
28.
Glynn, T., Crooks, T., Bethune, N., Ballard, K., & Smith, J. (1989). Reading recovery in context.Wellington, New Zealand: Department of Education.
29.
Kavale, K., & Forness, S. (1985). The science of learning disabilities.San Diego: College-Hill.
30.
Keogh, B. (1987). Learning disabilities: In defense of a construct. Learning Disabilities Research, 3, 4–9.
Milne, A., & Brown, D.F. (1987). Provisions for special education in New Zealand. In D. Mitchell & N. Singh (Eds.), Exceptional children in New Zealand (pp. 39–54). Palmerston North, New Zealand: Dunmore Press.
34.
Ministry of Education. (1989). Charter framework. Unpublished discussion paper, Ministry of Education, Wellington, New Zealand.
35.
Ministry of Education. (1991a). Achievement initiative. New Zealand Education Gazette, 70(7), 1–2.
36.
Ministry of Education. (1991b). Educational provision for learners with special needs: A review of policy. Unpublished discussion paper, Ministry of Education, Wellington, New Zealand.
37.
Ministry of Education. (1991c, July 31). Government announces intentions for special education changes.Ministry of Education news release.
38.
Mitchell, D., & Singh, N. (Eds.). (1987). Exceptional children in New Zealand.Palmerston North, New Zealand: Dunmore Press.
39.
Norman, H., Sritheran, E., & Ridding, C. (1984). Teachers' perceptions of children with special needs: A national survey of primary school teachers concerning children with special needs in regular classes.Wellington, New Zealand: Department of Education.
40.
OECD. (1983). Reviews of national policies for education: New Zealand.Paris: Author.
41.
Olssen, M. (Ed.). (1988). Mental testing in New Zealand: Critical and oppositional perspectives.Dunedin, New Zealand: Otago University Press.
42.
O'Regan, K. (1986). Educational Amendments (Specific Learning Disabilities) Bill: Explanatory notes. Unpublished notes circulated to Members of Parliament, New Zealand House of Representatives, Wellington.
43.
Reid, N., Jackson, P., Gilmore, A., & Croft, C. (1981). Test of scholastic abilities: Teachers' manual.Wellington: New Zealand Council for Educational Research.
44.
Roache, L.E., & Hunt, B.R. (1988). Palmerston North schools research project into learning difficulty in reading. Final research report to the Director of Research and Statistics, Department of Education, Wellington, New Zealand. Contract No. 41-17-159. Palmerston North, New Zealand: Department of Education Psychological Service.
45.
Seabrook, J.A. (no date). How the S.L.D. child in N.Z. presents in the home and at school. Unpublished manuscript, McKenzie Education Foundation, Christchurch, New Zealand.
46.
Shepard, L.A., Smith, M. L., & Vojir, C.P. (1983). Characteristics of pupils identified as learning disabled. American Educational Research Journal, 20, 309–331.
47.
Siegel, L.S. (1988). Evidence that IQ scores are irrelevant to the definition and analysis of reading disability. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 42, 201–215.
48.
Siegel, L.S. (1989). IQ is irrelevant to the definition of learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 22, 469–478.
49.
Sleek, D., & Howie, D. (1987). Legislation, rights and advocacy. In D. Mitchell & N. Singh (Eds.), Exceptional children in New Zealand (pp. 57–69). Palmerston North, New Zealand: Dunmore Press.
50.
Sleeter, C.E. (1986). Learning disabilities: The social construction of a special education category. Exceptional Children, 53, 46–54.
51.
Snook, I.A. (1990a). The indigenous and the imported: The New Zealand school system. International Review of Education, 36, 219–232.
52.
Snook, I.A. (1990b, June). Policy change in higher education: The New Zealand experience. Paper presented at the Seminar on Policy Change in Higher Education, Turku, Finland.
53.
SPELD. (1985). Statement on education for children with specific learning disabilities.Christchurch, New Zealand: SPELD New Zealand.
54.
SPELD. (no date). The third wave: Specific learning disabilities.Wellington, New Zealand: SPELD New Zealand.
55.
Stanovich, K.E. (1991). Discrepancy definitions of reading disability: Has intelligence led us astray?Reading Research Quarterly, 26, 7–29.
56.
Sternberg, R.J. (1985). Beyond IQ: A triarchic theory of human intelligence.Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
57.
Tunmer, W.E., & Chapman, J.W. (1990). A reply to Croft: Ability test construction as naive retrograde empiricism. New Zealand Sociology, 5, 192–200.
58.
Walsh, D.F. (1979). Project CHILD: A report on the incidence of specific learning difficulties in Form 1 pupils in New Zealand primary and intermediate schools.Wellington: New Zealand Council for Educational Research.
