Dear Dr. Wiederholt: Thank you for including my comments on Blaskey et al.'s article, “The Effectiveness of Irlen Filters for Improving Reading Performance: A Pilot Study” (JLD, December 1990) in the Letters to the Editor (JLD, November 1991). There is one error, however, in the copy.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Blakeslee, S. (1991, September 15). Study ties dyslexia to brain flaw affecting vision and other senses. The New York Times, pp. 1, 30.
2.
Blaskey, P., Scheiman, M., Parisi, M., Ciner, E.B., Gallaway, M., & Selznick, R. (1990). The effectiveness of Irlen filters for improving reading performance: A pilot study. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 23, 604–612.
3.
Livingstone, M.S., Rosen, G. S., Drislane, F.W., & Galaburda, A.M. (1991). Physiological and anatomical evidence for a magnocellular defect in developmental dyslexia. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science USA (Neurobiology), 88, 7943–7947.
4.
Lovegrove, W.J., Garzia, R. P., & Nicholson, S.B. (1990). Experimental evidence for a transient system deficit in specific reading disability. Journal of the American Optometric Association, 61(2), 137–146.
5.
Scheiman, M., Blaskey, P., Parisi, M., Ciner, E., Gallaway, M., & Selznick, R. (1991). Response [Letter to the editor]. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 24, 516–517.
6.
Ward, B.J. (1991). Irlen lenses [Letter to the editor]. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 24, 514–516.
7.
Williams, M.C., & Lecluyse, K. (1991). Perceptual consequences of a temporal processing deficit in reading disabled children. Journal of the American Optometric Association, 61(2), 111–121.
