This article considers the sociocultural perspective as a framework for writing instruction. Four assumptions of the perspective are examined and illustrated: Writing is a holistic cognitive activity; cognitive processes are learned in dialogic interactions with others; cognitive development occurs in students' zones of proximal development; and knowledge construction is a social and cultural phenomenon.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Alvermann, D.E. (1989). Teacher-student mediation of content area texts. Theory Into Practice, 28(2), 142–147.
2.
Anderson, L.M., Raphael, T. E., Englert, C.S., & Stevens, D.D. (1991, April). Teaching writing with a new instructional model: Variations in teachers' practices and student performance. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.
3.
Anthony, H.M., & Anderson, L.M. (1987, April). The nature of writing instruction in regular and special education classrooms. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Council for Exceptional Children, Chicago.
4.
Applebee, A.N., & Langer, J.A. (1983). Instructional scaffolding: Reading and writing as natural language activities. Language Arts, 60, 168–175.
5.
Au, K.H., & Kawakami, A.J. (1986). The influence of the social organization of instruction on children's text comprehension ability: A Vygotskian perspective. In T.E. Raphael (Ed.), The contexts of school-based literacy (pp. 63–77). New York: Random House.
6.
Bruffee, K.A. (1986). Social construction, language and the authority of knowledge: A bibliographical essay. College English, 48, 773–790.
7.
Bruner, J. (1986). Actual minds, possible worlds.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
8.
Cazden, C.B. (1981). Performance before competence: Assistance to child discourse in the zone of proximal development. The Quarterly Newsletter of Comparative Human Cognition, 3, 5–8.
9.
Daiute, C. (1986). Do 1 and 1 make 2?Written Communication, 3, 283–408.
10.
Diaz, R.M., Neal, C. J., & Amaya-Williams, M. (1990). The social origins of self-regulation. In L.C. Moll (Ed.), Vygotsky and education: The instructional implications and applications of sociohistorical psychology (pp. 127–154). New York: Cambridge University Press.
11.
Edwards, D., & Mercer, N. (1987). Common knowledge: The development of understanding in the classroom.New York: Methuen.
12.
Edwards, D., & Mercer, N. (1989). Reconstructing context: The conventionalization of classroom knowledge. Discourse Processes, 12, 91–104.
13.
Englert, C.S. (1990). Unraveling the mysteries of writing through strategy instruction. In T.E. Scruggs & B.Y.L. Wong (Eds.), Intervention research in learning disabilities (pp. 186–223). New York: Springer-Verlag.
14.
Englert, C.S., & Mariage, T.V. (1991). Shared understandings: Structuring the writing experience through dialogue. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 24, 330–342.
15.
Englert, C.S., Mariage, T. V., & Gavelek, J. (1990, April). A social constructivist view of written literacy instruction. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Council for Exceptional Children, Toronto, Canada.
16.
Englert, C.S., & Palincsar, A.S. (1991). Reconsidering instructional research from a sociocultural perspective. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 6, 225–229.
17.
Englert, C.S., & Raphael, T.E. (1989). Developing successful writers through cognitive strategy instruction. In J.E. Brophy (Ed.), Advances in research on teaching (Vol. 1, pp. 105–151). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
18.
Englert, C.S., Raphael, T. E., & Anderson, L.M. (in press). Socially-mediated instruction: Students' knowledge and talk about writing. Elementary School Journal.
19.
Englert, C.S., Raphael, T. E., Anderson, L.M., Anthony, H.M., & Stevens, D.D. (in press). Making writing strategies and self-talk visible: Strategy instruction in regular and special education classrooms. American Educational Research Journal.
20.
Englert, C.S., Raphael, T. E., Anderson, L.M., Gregg, S.L., & Anthony, H.M. (1989). Exposition: Reading, writing and the metacognitive knowledge of learning disabled students. Learning Disabilities Research, 5(1), 5–24.
21.
Forman, E.A., & Cazden, C.B. (1985). Exploring Vygotskian perspectives in education: The cognitive value of peer interaction. In J.V. Wertsch (Ed.), Culture, communication and cognition: Vygotskian perspectives (pp. 323–347). New York: Cambridge University Press.
22.
Gallimore, R., Tharp, R., & Rueda, R. (1989). The social context of cognitive functioning in the lives of mildly handicapped persons. In D. Sugden (Ed.), Cognitive approaches in special education (pp. 51–81). London: Falmer Press.
23.
Graves, D.H., & Hansen, J. (1983). The author's chair. Language Arts, 60(2), 176–183.
24.
Heap, J.L. (1989). Writing as social action. Theory Into Practice, 28(2), 148–153.
Lemke, J.L. (1987, April). Talking science: Content, conflict and semantics. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Washington, DC.
27.
Lemke, J.L. (1989). Making text talk. Theory Into Practice, 28(2), 136–141.
28.
Mehan, H. (1979). Learning lessons.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
29.
Middleton, D. (1987). Dance to the music: Conversational remembering and joint activity in learning an English Morris dance. The Quarterly Newsletter of the Laboratory of Comparative Human Cognition, 9(1), 23–38.
30.
Moll, L.C. (1990). Introduction. In L.C. Moll (Ed.), Vygotsky and education: Instructional implications and applications of sociohistorical psychology (pp. 1–27). New York: Cambridge University Press.
31.
Moll, L.C. (in press). Introduction. In C.S. Englert (Ed.), Instructional issues in conducting intervention research at the elementary level.New York: Springer-Verlag.
32.
Nystrand, M. (1989). A social-interactive model of writing. Written Communication, 6(1), 66–85.
33.
Raphael, T.E., & Englert, C.S. (1990). Writing and reading: Partners in constructing meaning. The Reading Teacher, 43, 388–400.
34.
Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprenticeship in thinking: Cognitive development in social context.New York: Oxford University Press.
35.
Rowe, D.W. (1989). Author/audience interaction in the preschool: The role of social interaction in literacy learning. Journal of Reading Behavior, 21, 311–349.
36.
Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1983). The development of evaluative, diagnostic and remedial capabilities in children's composing. In M. Martlew (Ed.), The psychology of written language: Developmental and educational perspectives (pp. 67–95). London: Wiley.
37.
Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1986). Written composition. In M. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 778–803). New York: Macmillan.
38.
Schon, D.A. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
39.
Sinclair, J., & Coulthard, R.M. (1975). Towards an analysis of discourse: The English used by teachers and pupils.London: Oxford University Press.
40.
Teale, W.H., & Sulzby, E. (1986). Emergent literacy: Writing and reading.Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
41.
Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Mind in society.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
42.
Wells, G. (1990). Talk about text: Where literacy is learned and taught. Curriculum Inquiry, 20, 369–405.
43.
Wertsch, J.V. (1985). Vygotsky and the social formation of mind.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
44.
Wong, B.Y.L., Wong, R., & Blenkinsop, J. (1989). Cognitive and metacognitive aspects of learning disabled adolescents' composing problems. Learning Disability Quarterly, 12, 300–322.
