This commentary responds to Bashir and Scavuzzo's assertion that dyslexia should be viewed as a chronic, pervasive condition. The limitations of viewing dyslexia in such a light are identified, and alternate perceptions are proposed. Implications and impact of instructional curricula on reading achievement are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Adams, M.J. (1989). Beginning to read: Thinking and learning about print. In S. Stahl, J. Osborn, & F. Lehr (Eds.), A summary. Urbana-Champaign: Center for the Study of Reading, University of Illinois.
2.
Carnine, D.C. (1976). Similar sound separation and cumulative introduction in learning letter-sound correspondences. Journal of Educational Research, 69, 368–372.
3.
Carnine, D.C. (1981). Reducing training problems associated with visually and auditorily similar correspondences. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 14, 276–279.
4.
Carnine, D.C., & Kameenui, E.J. (1990). The General Education Initiative and children with special needs: A false dilemma in the face of true problems. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 23, 141-144, 148.
5.
Carroll, J.B. (1963). A model of school learning. Teachers College Record, 64, 722–733.
6.
Carroll, J.B. (1989). The Carroll model: A 25-year retrospective and prospective view. Educational Researcher, 18, 26–31.
7.
Clark, M., & Gosnell, M. (1982, March 22). Dealing with dyslexia. Newswee., pp. 55–56.
8.
Engelmann, S., & Carnine, D. (1982). Theory of instruction: Principles and applications. New York: Irvington.
9.
Gickling, E.E., & Thompson, V.P. (1985). A personal view of curriculum-based assessment. Exceptional Children, 52, 205–218.
10.
Gough, P., & Tunmer, W. (1986). Decoding, reading, and reading disability. Remedial and Special Education, 7(1), 6–10.
11.
Gould, S. (1981). The mismeasure of man. New York: Norton.
12.
Juel, C. (1988, April). Learning to read and write: A longitudinal study of fifty-four children from first through fourth grade. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans.
13.
Kameenui, E.J., & Simmons, D.C. (1990). Designing instructional strategies: The prevention of academic learning problems. Columbus, OH: Merrill.
14.
Kavale, K., & Forness, S. (1985). Learning disability and the history of science: Paradigm or paradox?Remedial and Special Educatio., 6(4), 12–23.
15.
Lipson, M.Y., & Wixson, K.K. (1986). Reading disability research: An interactionist perspective. Review of Educational Research, 56, 111–136.
16.
Mendenhall, W. (1983). Introduction to probability and statistics. Boston: PWS.
17.
Simmons, D.C., & Kameenui, E.J. (1986). Articulating learning disabilities for the public: A case of professional riddles. Learning Disability Quarterly, 9, 304–314.
18.
Simmons, D.C., & Kameenui, E.J. (1991). The perceptions of regular and special educators on factors that influence reading achievement of students with reading disability. Unpublished manuscript.
19.
Spear, L.D., & Sternberg, R.J. (1986). An information processing framework for understanding reading disability. In S. Ceci (Ed.), Handbook of cognitive, social, and neuropsychological aspects of learning disabilitie. (Vol. 2, pp. 3–31). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
20.
Stallings, W.M. (1985). Mind your p's and alphas. Educational Researcher, 14, 19–20.
21.
Stanovich, K.E. (1986). Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 31, 360–406.
22.
Summers, J. (1977, November-December). Special feature on learning disabilities. Today's Educatio., pp. 36–48.
23.
U.S. Department of Education. (1989). Eleventh annual report to Congress on the implementation of the Education of the Handicapped Act. Washington, DC: U.S. Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services.
24.
Winslow, R. (1982, February 21). College for the learning disabled. New York Times Magazin., pp. 80, 87, 90.
