Ayres, A.J. (1968). Sensory integrative processes and neuropsychological learning disabilities. In J. Hellmuth (Ed.), Learning disorder. (Vol. 3, pp. 43–58). Seattle, WA: Special Child Publications.
2.
Barsch, R.H. (1967). Achieving perceptualmotor efficiency: A space-oriented approach to learning. Seattle, WA: Special Child Publications.
3.
Barsch, R.H. (1968). Perspectives on learning disabilities: The vectors of a new convergence. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1, 7–23.
4.
Bateman, B. (1965). An educator's view of a diagnostic approach to learning disorders. In J. Hellmuth (Ed.), Learning disorder. (Vol. 1). Seattle, WA: Special Child Publications.
5.
Carnine, D., & Woodward, J. (1988). Paradigms lost: Learning disabilities and the new ghost in the old machine. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 21, 233–236.
6.
Carter v. Florence County School District Four,—F. Supp.—, 17 EHLR 452 (D.C.S. Carolina, 1991).
7.
Cratty, B.J. (1981). Sensory-motor and perceptual-motor theories and practices: An overview and evaluation. In R. Walk & H. Pick (Eds.), Intersensory perception and sensory interaction. New York: Plenum Press.
8.
Cullinan, D. (1988). Basic research and basic needs in research on learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 21, 227–229.
9.
Delacato, C.H. (1966). Neurological organization and reading. Springfield, IL: Thomas.
10.
Dunn, L.M. (1968). Special education for the mildly retarded—Is much of it justified?Exceptional Childre., 35, 5–22.
11.
Frostig, M., & Horne, D. (1964). The Frostig program for the development of visual perception. Chicago: Follett.
12.
Fuchs, D., & Fuchs, L.S. (1991). Framing the REI debate: Abolitionists v. conservationists. In J.W. Lloyd, N.N. Singh, & A.C. Repp (Eds.), The Regular Education Initiative: Alternative perspectives on concepts, issues and models. Sycamore, IL: Sycamore Publishing Co.
13.
General Accounting Office. (1981). Disparities still exist in who gets special education. Report to the Chairman, Subcommittee on Select Education, Committee in Education and Labor, House of Representatives of the United States. Gaithersburg, MD: Author.
14.
Hammill, D.D., & Larsen, S.C. (1974). The effectiveness of psycholinguistic training. Exceptional Children, 41, 5–14.
15.
Hammill, D.D. & Larsen, S.C. (1978). The effectiveness of psycholinguistic training: A reaffirmation of position. Exceptional Children, 44, 402–414.
16.
Hammill, D.D., Leigh, J.E., McNutt, G., & Larsen, S.C. (1981). A new definition of learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 4, 336–342.
17.
Hendrick Hudson District Board of Education v. Rowley, 458 U.S. 176 (1982).
18.
International Institute of Advocacy for School Children. (1991). Academic child abuse. (Available from IIASC, P.O. Box 10459, Eugene, OR 97401)
19.
Kameenui, E.J. (1991). Toward a scientific pedagogy of learning disabilities: A sameness in the message. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 24, 364–372.
20.
Kavale, K.A. & Forness, S.R. (1985). The science of learning disabilities. San Diego, CA: College-Hill.
Kerlinger, F.N. (1977). The influence of research on education practice. Educational Researcher, 6(8), 5–18.
23.
Kirk, S.A. (1968). Illinois Test of Psycholinguistic Abilities: Its origins and implications. In J. Hellmuth (Ed.), Learning disorder. (Vol. 3). Seattle, WA: Special Child Publications.
24.
Kirk, S.A., & Bateman, B.D. (1962). Diagnosis and remediation of learning disabilities. Exceptional Children, 29, 73–78.
25.
Lloyd, J.W. (1984). How shall we individualize instruction—Or should we?Remedial and Special Educatio., 5(1), 7–15.
26.
Office of Special Education Programs. (1990). Kenned., 16 EHLR 1082.
27.
Silver, L.B. (1987). The “magic cure”: A review of the current controversial approaches for treating learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 20, 498-504, 512.
28.
Simmons, D.C., Fuchs, D., & Fuchs, L.S. (1991). Instructional and curricular requisites of mainstreamed students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 24, 353–359.
29.
Stanovich, K.E. (1988). Science and learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 21, 210–214.
30.
Swanson, H.L. (1988). Toward a metatheory of learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 21, 196–209.
31.
Ysseldyke, J.E., & Salvia, J. (1974). Diagnostic-prescriptive teaching: Two models. Exceptional Children, 41, 181–185.
32.
Ysseldyke, J.E., Thurlow, M., Graden, J., Wesson, C., Algozzine, B., & Deno, S. (1983). Generalizations from five years of research on assessment and decision making: The University of Minnesota Institute. Exceptional Education Quarterly, 4, 75–94.