This study examined whether a “goodness of fit” theoretical model, applied to families with and without children with learning disabilities, would be valuable in understanding the children's performance in school. A home interview was conducted with 63 families with a child with learning disabilities and 53 families with a comparable child without learning disabilities. The mothers were asked to rate how their own child fit into the family's expectations for children. It was found that, for both groups of families, children who were rated as a “poor fit” in the home demonstrated less positive behavior in the classroom and poorer achievement over the elementary school years. There was some evidence that poor fit in the home was even more negatively related to outcomes for children with learning disabilities. Discussion is centered on the importance of this theoretical model for understanding the importance of the home on successful school function.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Adelman, H.S., & Taylor, L. (1986). An introduction to learning disabilities. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.
2.
Chapman, J.W., & Boersma, F.J. (1979). Learning disabilities, locus of control, and mother attitudes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 250–258.
3.
Crnic, K.A., Friedrich, W. N., & Greenberg, M.T. (1983). Adaptation of families with mentally retarded children: A model of stress, coping and family ecology. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 88, 125–138.
Feagans, L.V., & McKinney, J.D. (1981). The pattern of exceptionality across domains in learning disabled children. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 1, 313–328.
6.
Frey, K.S., Greenberg, M. T., & Fewell, R.R. (1989). Coping among parents of handicapped children: A multidimensional approach. American Journal of Mental Retardation, 94, 240–249.
7.
Gallimore, R., Weisner, T. S., Kaufman, S.Z., & Bernheimer, L.P. (1989). The social construction of ecocultural riches: Family accommodation of developmentally delayed children. American Journal of Mental Retardation, 94, 216–230.
8.
Hallahan, D.P., Kauffman, J. M., & Lloyd, J.W. (1985). Introduction to learning disabilities. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
9.
Humphries, T.W., & Bauman, E. (1980). Maternal child rearing attitudes associated with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 13, 54–57.
10.
Ladd, G.W., & Price, J.M. (1987). Predicting children's social and school adjustment following the transition from preschool to kindergarten. Child Development, 58, 1168–1189.
11.
Lerner, J. V. (1984). The import of temperament for psychosocial functioning: Tests of a goodness of fit model. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 30(2), 177–188.
12.
Lerner, J.V., Nitz, K., Talwar, R., & Lerner, R.M. (1989). On the functional significance of temperamental individuality: A developmental contextual view of the concept of goodness of fit. In G.A. Kohnstamm, J.E. Bates, & M.K. Rothbart (Eds.), Temperament in childhood (pp. 509–522). New York: Wiley.
13.
Lerner, J. W. (1985). Learning disabilities: Theories, diagnoses, and teaching strategies. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
14.
Lerner, R.M. (1989). Developmental contextualism and the life-span view of person-context interaction. In M.H. Bornstein & J.S. Bruner (Eds.), Interaction in human development (pp. 217–239). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
15.
Margalit, M., & Heiman, T. (1986). Learning-disabled boys' anxiety, parental anxiety, and family climate. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 15(3), 248–253.
16.
McKinney, J.D., & Feagans, L.V. (1984). Academic and behavioral characteristics: Longitudinal studies of learning disabled children and average achievers. Learning Disability Quarterly, 7, 251–265.
17.
McKinney, J.D., Feagans, L. V., Ferguson, J.A., & Burnett, C.K. (1978). The SCAN manual. Chapel Hill, NC: Frank Porter Graham Child Development Center.
Pearl, R., Donahue, M., & Bryan, T. (1986). Social relationships of learning-disabled children. In J.K. Torgesen & B. Y. L. Wong (Eds.), Psychological and educational perspectives on learning disabilities. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
20.
Rees, R.J., Strom, R. D., Wurster, S., & Goldman, R. (1984). Parental expectations for handicapped and non-handicapped children. Australia and New Zealand Journal of Developmental Disabilities, 10(4), 229–241.
21.
Schneiria, T.C. (1957). The concept of development in comparative psychology. In D.B. Harris (Ed.), The concept of development (pp. 78–108). Minneapolis: The University of Minnesota Press.
22.
Silver, L.B. (1984). The misunderstood child: A guide for parents of learning disabled children. New York: McGraw-Hill.
23.
Silver, L.B. (1989). Psychological and family problems associated with learning disabilities: Assessment and intervention. The Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 28, 309–313.
24.
Smith, C.R. (1983). Learning disabilities: The interaction of learner, task, and setting. Boston: Little, Brown.
25.
Talwar, R., Schwab, J., & Lerner, R.M. (1989). Early adolescent temperament and academic competence: Tests of “direct effects” and developmental contextual models. Journal of Early Adolescence, 9(3), 291–309.
26.
Thomas, A., & Chess, S. (1977). Temperament and development. New York: Brunner/Mazel.
27.
Tollison, P., Palmer, D. J., & Stowe, M.L. (1987). Mothers' expectations, interactions, and achievement attributions for their learning disabled or normally achieving sons. The Journal of Special Education, 21(3), 83–93.
28.
Turnbull, A.P., Summers, J. A., & Brotherson, M.J. (1986). Family life cycle: Theoretical and empirical implications and future directions for families with mentally retarded members. In J. Gallagher & P. Vietze (Eds.), Families of handicapped persons: Research, programs, and policy issues (pp. 45–65). Baltimore: Brookes.
29.
Wechsler, D. (1974). Wechsler intelligence scale for children-Revised. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corp.
Ziegler, R., & Holden, L. (1988). Family therapy for learning disabled and attention-deficit disordered children. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 58, 196–210.
