Adelman, H.S., & Taylor, L. (1986). Moving the LD field ahead: New paths, new paradigms.Journal of Learning Disabilities,19, 602–608.
2.
Arter, J., & Jenkins, J. (1977). Examining the benefits and prevalence of modality considerations in special education.The Journal of Special Education,11, 281–298.
3.
Brophy, J., & Good, T. (1974). Teacher-student relationships: Causes and consequences.New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
4.
Bruner, J.S., & Postman, L. (1949). On the perception of incongruity: A paradigm.Journal of Personality, 18, 206–223.
5.
Campbell, J. (1982). Grammatical man: Information, entropy, language, and life.New York: Simon & Schuster.
6.
Carnine, D. W., Silbert, J., & Kameenui, E. J. (1990). Direct instruction reading (2nd ed.). Columbus, OH: Merrill.
7.
Carriker, W. (1989). Testimony before the Senate Subcommittee on the handicapped.TED Newsletter,14, 5–6.
8.
Carroll, J.B. (1963). A model of school learning.Teachers College Record,64, 723–733.
9.
Chall, J. (1967). Learning to read: The great debate.New York: McGraw-Hill.
10.
Christenson, S. L., Ysseldyke, J. E., & Thurlow, M.L. (1989). Critical instructional factors for students with mild handicaps: An integrative review.Remedial and Special Education,10(5), 21–31.
11.
Cole, N.S., & Nitko, A.J. (1981). Instrumentation and bias: Issues in selecting measures for educational evaluations. In R. A. Berk (Ed.), Educational evaluation methodology: The state of the art. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
12.
Cooley,W. W., & Leinhardt, G. (1980). The instructional dimensions study.Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis,2, 7–25.
13.
Delacato, C. H. (1959). The treatment and prevention of reading difficulty.New York: Harcourt, Brace & World.
14.
Delpit, L. D. (1988). The silenced dialogue: Power and pedagogy in educating other people's children.Harvard Educational Review,58, 280–298.
15.
Denckla, M.B. (1972). Clinical syndromes in learning disabilities: The case for splitting versus lumping.Journal of Learning Disabilities,5, 401–405.
16.
Dixon, C.N. (1979). Selection and use of instructional materials. In R. C. Cctlfee & P. A. Drum (Eds.), Teaching reading in compensatory classes (pp. 104–113). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
17.
Dole, J. A., Rogers, T., & Osborn, J. (1987). Improving selection of basal reading programs: A report of the textbook adoption guidelines project.The Elementary School Journal, 87, 284–298.
18.
Duffy, G., & McIntyre, L. (1980). A qualitative analysis of how various primary grade teachers employ the structured learning component of the direct instruction model when teaching reading (Research Series No. 80). East Lansing: Michigan State University, Institute for Research on Teaching.
19.
Engelmann, S., & Carnine, D. (1982). Theory of instruction: Principles and applications.New York: Irvington.
20.
Farr,R., & Tulley, M. A. (1985). Do adoption committees perpetuate mediocre textbooks?Phi Delta Kappan, 66, 467–471.
21.
Farr, R., Tulley, M.A., & Powell, D. (1987). The evaluation and selection of basal readers.The Elementary School Journal,87, 267–281.
22.
Farr, R., Tulley, M., & Ray ford, L. (1984). Local district adoption practices in the nonadoption states. Unpublished manuscript, Indiana University, Bloomington.
23.
Freeman, D. J., Kuhs,T. M., Porter, A. C., Floden, R. F., Schmidt, W. H., & Schwille, J. R. (1983). Do textbooks and tests define a national curriculum in elementary school mathematics?The Elementary School Journal, 83, 501–513.
24.
Gaddes, W. H. (1980). Learning disabilities and brain function: A neuropsychological approach.New York: Springer-Verlag.
25.
Gartner, A., & Lipskyf D.K. (1987). Beyond special education: Toward a quality system for all students.Harvard Educational Review, 57, 367–395.
26.
Gelzheiser, L.M. (1987). Reducing the number of students identified as learning disabled: A question of practice, philosophy, or policy?Exceptional Children, 54, 145–150.
27.
George, M. P., George, N. L., & Grosenick, J.K. (1990). Teachers at risk: An examination of teacher attrition in the fldld of behavior disorders. In J. Marr, N. George, M. George, & G. Tindal (Eds.), The Oregon conference monograph (pp. 219–224). Eugene: University of Oregon, Division of Teacher Education.
28.
Gersten, R., Carnine, D., & White, W.A. (1983). The pursuit of clarity: Direct instruction and applied behavior analysis. In W. Heward, T. Heron, D. Hill, & J. Trap-Porter (Eds.), Focus on behavior analysis in education (pp. 38–57). Columbus, OH: Merrill.
29.
Glass, G. V. (1983). Effectiveness of special education.Policy Studies Review,2, 65–78.
30.
Goldstein, P. (1978). Changing the American schoolbook.Lexington, MA: Heath.
31.
Good, T.,SLBrophy, J. (1986). School effects. In M.C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 570–602). New York: Macmillan.
32.
Good, T. L., & Grouws, D.A. (1979). The Missouri Mathematics Effectiveness Project: An experimental study of fourth-grade classrooms.Journal of Educational Psychology,71, 355–362.
33.
Good, T. L., Grou ws, D.A., & Ebmeier, H. (1983). Active mathematics teaching.New York: Longman.
34.
Goodlad, J. (1970). Behind the classroom door.Worthington, OH: Charles Jones.
35.
Hagin,R. A., Beecher, R., & Silver, A. A. (1982). Definition of learning disabilities: A clinical approach. In J. P. Das, R.F. Mulcahy, & A.E. Wall (Eds.), Theory and research in learning disabilities (pp. 45–58). New York: Plenum Press.
36.
Hammill, D.D. (1990). On defining learning disabilities: An emerging consensus.Journal of Learning Disabilities,23, 74–84.
37.
Harris, A. J. (1982). How many kinds of reading disability are there?Journal of Learning Disabilities,15, 456–460.
38.
Jensen, F. A. (1931). Current procedures in selecting textbooks.Philadelphia: Lippincott.
39.
Juel, C. (1988, April). Learning to read and write: A longitudinal study of fifty-four children from first through fourth grade. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans.
40.
Kameenui, E.J. (1985). Direct instruction of reading comprehension: Beyond teacher performance variables to the design-of-instruction. In J.NilesSiR. Lalik (Eds.), Thirty-fourth yearbook of the National Reading Conference. Issues in literacy: A research perspective (pp. 257–262). Rochester, NY: National Reading Conference.
41.
Kameenui, E. J. (in press). Publishing in research journals: Guarding against the false and fashionable. In J.F. Baumann & D.D. Johnson (Eds.), ublishing professional and instructional materials in reading and language arts. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
42.
Kameenui, E. J., & Carnine, D. W. (1990). A curriculum model for analyzing mathematics materials and instruction: Overview of a three-year project. In G. Tindal (Ed.), The Oregon conference monograph (pp. 142–145). Eugene: University of Oregon.
43.
Kameenui, E. J., & Simmons, D. C. (1990). Designing instructional strategies: The prevention of academic learning problems.Columbus, OH: Merrill.
44.
Kaufman, M., Kameenui, E.J., Birman, B., & Danielson, L. (1990). Special education and the process of change: Victim or master of educational reform?Exceptional Children, 57, 109–116.
45.
Kavale, K. A., & Forness, S. R. (1985). The science of learning disabilities.San Diego, CA: Coilege-Hill.
46.
Keogh, B.K. (1982). Research in learning disabilities: A view of status and need. In J.P. Das, R.F. Mulcahy, & A.E. Wall (Eds.), Theory and research in learning disabilities (pp. 27–44). New York: Plenum Press.
47.
Kephart, N., (1971). The slow learner in the classroom.Columbus, OH: Merrill.
48.
Kirk, S.A., & Batettian, B. (1962). Diagnosis and remediation of learning disabilities.Exceptional Children, 29, 73–78.
49.
Klix, F. (1983). An evolutionary approach to cognitive processes and creativity in human beings. In R. Groner, M. Groner, & W.F. Bischot (Eds.), Methods of heuristics. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
50.
Kuhn, T.S. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
51.
Linn, R.L. (1983). Testing and instruction: Links and distinctions.Journal of Educational Measurement,20, 179–189.
52.
Merrill, M.D., Reigeluth, C. M., & Faust, G. W. (1979). The instructional quality profile: A curriculum evaluation and design tool. In H.F. O'Nsil (Ed.), Procedures for instructional systems development (pp. 165–204). New York: Academic Press.
53.
Mosenthal, P. (1982). Designing training programs for learning disabled children: An ideologica perspective.Topics in Learning & Learning Disabilities,2(1), 97–107.
54.
Mosenthal, P. (1984). The problem of partial specification in translating reading research into practice.The Elementary School Journal, 85(2), 1–28.
55.
Nitko, A. J. (1989). Designing tests that are integrated with instruction. In R.L. Linn (Ed.), Educational measurement (3rd ed., pp. 447–474). New York: Macmillan.
56.
Osborn, J. H., Jones, B. F., & Stein, M. L. (1985). The case for improving textbook programs: An issue of quality.Educational Leadership,42, 9–16.
57.
Parker, R., Kameenui, E. J., & Jitendra, A. (1990). Analysis of a grade 3-5 elementary math curriculum for production of valid math tests: Works in progress. In G. Tindal (Ed.), The Oregon conference monograph (pp. 71–79). Eugene: University of Oregon.
58.
Prasse, D. P. (1986). Litigation and special education: An introduction.Exceptional Children,52, 311–312.
59.
Prawat, R.S. (1989). Promoting access to knowledge, strategy and disposition in students: A research synthesis.Review of Educational Research,59(1), 1–41.
60.
Roid, G.H., & Haladyna, T (1982). A technology for test item writing.New York: Academic Press.
61.
Rosecky, M. (1978). Are teachers selective when using basal guidebooks?Reading Teacher,32, 381–385.
62.
Rothstein, L.F. (1990). Special education law.New York: Longman.
63.
Rudman, H.E., Kelly, J.L., Wanons, D.S., Mehrens, W.A., Clark, C.U., & Porter, A.C. (1980). Integrating assessment with instruction: A review (1922-1980) (Research Series No. 75). East Lansing: Michigan State University, College of Education.
64.
Simmons, D., & Kameenui, E.J. (1986). Articulating learning disabilities for the public: A case of professional riddles.Learning Disability Quarterly,9, 304–314.
65.
Singer, H. (1977). Resolving curriculum conflicts in the 1970's.Language Arts,54, 158–163.
66.
Smylie, M.A. (1988). The enhancement function of staff development: Organizational andpsycholog ical antecedents to individual teacher change.American Educational Research Journal,25, 1–30.
67.
Smylie, M.A. (1989). Teachers' views of the effectiveness of sources of learning to teach.The Elementary School Journal,89, 543–558.
68.
Stanovich, K.E. (1986). Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy.Reading Research Quarterly,21, 360–406.
69.
Tennyson, R., & Christensen, D.L. (1986, April). Memory theory and design of intelligent learning systems. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.
70.
Tennyson, R.D., & Cocchiarella, M.J. (1986). An empirically based instructional design theory for teaching concepts.Review of Educational Research,56(1), 40–71.
71.
Tulley, M., & Farr, R. (1985). The purpose of state level textbook adoption: What does the legislation reveal?Journal of Research and Development in Education,18(2), 1–6.
72.
Turnbull, H.R. (1990). Free appropriate public education: The law and children with disabilities (3rd ed.). Denver: Love.
73.
Tyson-Bernstein, M. (1988). A conspiracy of good intentions: America's textbook fiasco.Washington, DC: Council for Basic Education.
74.
U.S. Department of Education. (1989). Eleventh annual report to Congress on the implementation of the Education for All Handicapped Children Act.Washington, DC: Author.
75.
Walberg, H.J. (1984). Improving the productivity of America's schools.Educational Leadership,41, 19–30.
76.
Weiskopf, P.E. (1980). Burnout among teachers of exceptional children.Exceptional Children,47(1), 18–23.
77.
Wiederholt, J.L. (1974). Historical perspectives in the education of children with learning disabilities. In L. Mann & D. Sabatino (Eds.), The second review of special education (pp. 103–149). Philadelphia: Journal of Special Education Press.
78.
Will, M. (1986). Educating students with learning problems: A shared responsibility.Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
79.
Willoughby, S.S., Bereiter, C., Hilton, P., & Rubinstein, J.H. (1987). Real math.LaSalle, IL: Open Court.
80.
Woodward, J.P., & Carnine, D. W. (1988). Antecedent knowledge and intelligent computer-assisted instruction.Journal of Learning Disabilities,21, 131–139.
81.
Ysseldyke, J.E., & Christenson, S.L. (1987). Evaluating students' instructional environments.Remedial and Special Education,8(3), 17–24.
82.
Zigmond, N. (1983, April). Towards a new definition of learning disabilities. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal.