Three curricular approaches to spelling instruction are discussed: (1) whole word, (2) phonemic, and (3) morphemic. Sameness analysis is used to indicate the theoretical potential of each approach for helping students with learning disabilities to achieve generalization in their spelling. The influence of generalization upon retention and transfer is also discussed. In light of weak empirical evidence to support these approaches, it is recommended that promising instructional programs be piloted prior to adoption. Some cautious practical recommendations are offered for analytically evaluating spelling programs under consideration for piloting.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Anderson, R.C., & Faust, G.W. (1973). Educational psychology: The science of instruction and learning. New York: Dodd, Mead.
2.
Becker, W.C., Dixon, R., & Anderson-Inman, L. (1980). Morphographic and root word analysis of 26,000 high frequency words (Tech. Rep. No. 1980-1). Eugene: University of Oregon, Follow Through Project.
3.
Border, E. (1971). Developmental dyslexia: Prevailing diagnostic concepts and a new diagnostic approach. In H. Myklebust (Ed.), Progress in learning disabilities (Vol. 2, pp. 293–321). New York: Grune & Stratton.
4.
Carlisle, J.F. (1987). The use of morphological knowledge in spelling derived forms by learning-disabled and normal students. Annals of Dyslexia, 37, 90–108.
5.
Chomsky, C. (1970). Reading, writing, and phonology. Harvard Educational Review, 40, 247–309.
6.
Chomsky, N, & Halle, D. (1968). The sound pattern of English. New York: Harper and Row.
7.
Dixon, R., & Engelmann, S. (1979). Corrective spelling through morphographs. Chicago: Science Research Associates.
8.
Earl, L.M., Wood, J., & Stennett, R.G. (1981). Morphographic spelling: A pilot study of its effectiveness with grade six students. Special Education in Canada, 55(4), 23–24.
9.
Gerber, M.M. (1984). Orthographic problem-solving ability of learning disabled and normally achieving students. Learning Disability Quarterly, 17, 157–164.
10.
Gerber, M.M. (1985). Spelling as concept-governed problem solving: Learning-disabled and normally achieving students. Advances in Reading/Language Research, 3, 39–75.
11.
Glatthorn, A.A. (1988, September). What schools should teach in the English language arts. Educational Leadership, pp. 44–50.
12.
Graham, S., & Miller, L. (1979). Spelling research and practice: A unified approach. Focus on Exceptional Children, 12(2), 1–16.
13.
Hanna, P.R., Hodges, R.C., & Hanna, J.S. (1971). Spelling: Structure and strategies. New York: Houghton Mifflin.
14.
Hesse, K.D., Robinson, J. W., & Rankin, R. (1983). Retention and transfer from a morphemically based direct instruction spelling program in junior high. Journal of Educational Research, 76, 276–279.
15.
Hillerich, R. (1977). Let's teach spelling—not phonetic misspelling. Language Arts, 54, 301–307.
16.
Monson, J. (1975). Is spelling spelled rut, routine, or revitalized?Elementary English, 52, 223–224.
17.
Perkins, D.N., & Salomon, G. (1988, September). Teaching for transfer. Educational Leadership, pp. 22–32.
18.
Poplin, M., Gray, R., Larsen, S., Banikowski, A., & Mehring, T. (1980). A comparison of components of written expression abilities in learning disabled and non-learning disabled students at three grade levels. Learning Disability Quarterly, 3, 46–55.
19.
Robinson, J. W., & Hesse, K.D. (1981). A morphemically based spelling program's effect on spelling skills and spelling performance of seventh grade students. Journal of Educational Research, 75, 56–62.
20.
Rosenshine, B., & Stevens, R. (1984). Classroom instruction in reading. In D. Pearson (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (pp. 745–798). New York: Longman.
21.
Rowell, G.A. (1972). A prototype for an individualized spelling program. Elementary English, 49, 602–604.
22.
Simon, D., & Simon, H. (1973). Alternative uses of phonemic information in spelling. Review of Educational Research, 73, 115–137.
23.
Slavin, R.E. (1986). The NAPA evaluation of Madeline Hunter's ITIP: Lessons learned. The Elementary School Journal, 87(2), 165–171.
24.
Slavin, R.E. (1989). Pet and the pendulum: Faddism in education and how to stop it. Phi Delta Kappan, 70, 752–758.
25.
Templeton, S., & Scarborough-Franks, L. (1985). The spelling's the thing: Knowledge of derivational morphology in orthography and phonology among older students. Applied Psycholinguistics, 6, 371–390.
26.
Tovey, D. (1978). Sound-it-out: A reasonable approach to spelling?Reading World, 17, 220–233.
27.
Venezky, R.L. (1970). The structure of English orthography. The Hague: Mouton.
28.
Vreeland, M. (1982). Corrective spelling program evaluated. ADI News, 1(2), 3.
