Hypertext Computer Study Guides and the Social Studies Achievement of Students with Learning Disabilities,Remedial Students,and Regular Education Students

Abstract

Editor's Comment: The purpose of the Interventions section of the journal is to provide professional practitioners with overviews of successful interventions that can be replicated with individuals with learning disabilities. These interventions can be either physiological or psychoeducational and can occur in school settings, clinics, hospitals, homes, communities, or employment sites. The discussion of these interventions generally includes (a) the theory or rationale of the interventions, (b) previous research findings, (c) characteristics of the individuals receiving the interventions, (d) the intervention that was applied, and (e) the criteria used to evaluate its success. In the following article, Drs. Kyle Higgins and Randall Boone of the University of Washington chronicle the use of hypertext computer study guides with a variety of students, including those with learning disabilities. The results indicated that such an approach is an effective instructional medium. In addition, retention of information appears to be improved. Such an approach would likely be helpful when employed with other students with learning disabilities.

Hypertext is a relatively new term for today's teachers, who work hard to stay abreast of the quickly changing field of computer technology in education. Hypertext as an educational tool is very different from traditional computer-assisted instructional software, offering the reader immediate access through its computer format to supplemental information. Two related studies were conducted to design and field-test hypertext computer study guides. In Study 1, 40 students (10 with learning disabilities, 15 remedial, and 15 regular education) worked in three different treatment groups (lecture, lecture/computer study guide, and computer study guide). Study 2 involved the five lowest achieving students (two with learning disabilities and three remedial) from Study I in an A-B-A design. Results indicated that (a) the computer study guide treatment was as effective as lecture, (b) the lecture/computer study guide treatment was as effective as lecture, (c) posttest scores were higher for the computer study guide group, and (d) retention test scores were higher for the computer study guide group.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Becker, H.J. (1983). School uses of microcomputers (Issue No. 1). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University, Center for Social Organization of Schools.

Becker, H.J. (1987, February). Using computers for instruction. Byte, pp. 149–162.

Bush, V. (1945). As we may think. Atlantic Monthly, 176, 101–108.

Carnine, D. (1984). Mainstreaming computers. Educational Leadership, 41(8), 77–82.

Collins, M. , Carnine, D. , & Gersten, R. (1987). Elaborative corrective feedback and the acquisition of reasoning skills: A study of computer-assisted instruction. Exceptional Children, 54, 254–262.

Grimm, P. (1983). Attention, perception, and memory: Screen design for CBT. Data Training, 3(1), 41–42.

Heines, J.M. (1983). Screen design strategies for computer aided instruction. Bedford, MA: Digital Press.

Kulik, J.A. , Bangert, R. L. , & Williams, G.W. (1983). Effects of computer-based teaching on secondary school students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 75, 19–26.

Kulik, J.A. , Kulik, C. L. , & Cohen, P.A. (1980). Effectiveness of computer-based college teaching. Review of Educational Research, 50, 525–544.

10.

Mokros, J.R. , & Russell, S.J. (1986). Learner-centered software: A survey of microcomputer use with special needs students. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 19, 185–190.

11.

Naiman, A. (1987, February). A hard look at educational software. Byte, pp. 193–200.

12.

Owl International . (1987). Guide: Hypertext for the Macintosh [Computer program]. Seattle, WA: Author.

13.

Pelz, R. (1979). The Washington story: A history of our state. Seattle, WA: Seattle Public Schools.

14.

Prescott, G.A. , Balow, I. H. , Hogan, T.P. , & Farr, R.C. (1984). The metropolitan achievement test. New York: Psychological Corp.

15.

Sarnacki, R.E. (1979). An examination of test-wiseness in the cognitive test domain. Review of Educational Research, 49(2), 252–279.

16.

Waugh, M.L. , & Currier, D. (1986). Computer-based education: What we know and need to know. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 5(3), 13–15.

17.

Winkler, J. , Shavelson, R. , Stasz, C. , Robyn, A. , & Feibel, W. (1984, April). How effective teachers use microcomputers for instruction. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.