With the current expansion and development of educational computing in public and private schools across the country, policy issues for computer integration can be extremely important for educators. In the present article, research on a 3-year computer integration program at a private school for students with learning disabilities is used to illustrate integration issues. Problems and limitations in the computer program, ranging from lack of direction, support, and leadership from the administration to the lack of funds for maintenance or development, are identified and discussed. Policies and implications for the future of educational computing for students with learning disabilities as well as for private schools are examined.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Anderson, C.A., & Smith, R.L. (1984). Instructional computing patterns in Texas schools: Implications for teacher training. AEDS Journal, 18(1), 1–16.
2.
Binnard, W. (1987). Computer learning month: Benefits of national collaboration. Technological Horizons in Education Journal, 15(3), 88–92.
3.
Blaschke, C.L. (1986). Technology for special education: A national strategy. Technological Horizons in Education Journal, 13(6), 77–82.
4.
Blomeyer, R.L., Jr. (1986). Instructional policy and the development of instructional computing: Maintaining adaptive educational programs. Educational Considerations, 13(3), 17–20.
5.
Bright, G. W. (1987). Integration of microcomputers in the elementary school curriculum. Paper presented at the Texas Computer Education Association State Conference, San Antonio, TX.
6.
Bruder, I. (1988). Electronic Learning's eighth annual survey of the states, 1988. Electronic Learning, 8(2), 38–45.
Chandler, H.N. (1978). How can mathematics research help the resource teacher?Journal of Learning Disabilities, 11, 361–369.
9.
Cosden, M.A., Gerber, M. M., Semmel, D.S., Goldman, S.R., & Semmel, M.I. (1987). Microcomputer use within micro-educational environments. Exceptional Children, 53, 399–409.
10.
Fleisher, L., & Jenkins, J.R. (1983). The effect of word and comprehension-emphasis instruction on reading performance. Learning Disability Quarterly, 6, 146–154.
11.
Goldman, S.R., Semmel, D. S., Cosden, M.A., Gerber, M.M., & Semmel, M.I. (1987). Special education administrators' policies and practices on microcomputer acquisition, allocation, and access for mildly handicapped children: Interfaces with regular education. Exceptional Children, 53, 330–339.
12.
Graham, S. (1983). The effect of self-instructional procedures on LD students' handwriting performance. Learning Disability Quarterly, 6, 231–234.
13.
Grossnickle, D.R., & Laird, B.A. (1981). Profile of change in education: A high school uses microcomputers. Educational Technology, 21, 7–11.
14.
Holleman, J.J. (1986). Expanding opportunities: Disabled students and microcomputer instruction at Berkeley's Vista College. Technological Horizons in Education Journal, 13(6), 68–71.
15.
Holmes, G. (1982). A discussion of some of the issues for would-be-implementors. Educational Technology, 22, 7–13.
16.
Hunter, B., & Alken, R. (1987). The evolution of computer courses in vocational education: Perspectives and directions. Technological Horizons in Education Journal, 14(7), 54–57.
17.
Jenkins, J.R., Larson, K., & Fleisher, L. (1983). Effects of error correction on word recognition and reading comprehension. Learning Disability Quarterly, 6, 139–145.
18.
Kauffman, J.M., Hallahan, D. P., Haas, K., Brame, T., & Boren, R. (1978). Imitating children's errors can improve their ability to spell. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 11, 217–230.
19.
Kerchner, L.B., & Kistinger, B.J. (1984). Language processing/word processing: Written expression, computers and learning disabled students. Learning Disability Quarterly, 7, 329–335.
20.
Lenkway, P. (1986). Minimum student performance standards in computer literacy: Florida's new state law. Technological Horizons in Education Journal, 13(9), 74–77.
21.
McLeod, T.M., & Crump, W.D. (1978). Deficits underlying math disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 11, 237–241.
22.
Quinn, D. (1984). Perspective from the other side: A message of hope for learning disability teachers and students. Learning Disability Quarterly, 7, 295–298.
23.
Rakovic, G. (1987). Brooklyn High School dedicated to high-technology learning. Technological Horizons in Education Journal, 14(7), 58–60.
24.
Solomon, G. (1988). The role of the federal government in educational technology. Electronic Learning, 8(2), 46–49.
25.
Telem, M. (1984). Must computerization fail in schools? Training needed. Educational Technology, 24(6), 19–22.
26.
Towle, M. (1978). Assessment and remediation of handwriting deficits. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 11, 370–377.
27.
Trifiletti, J.J., Frith, G. H., & Armstrong, S. (1984). Microcomputers versus resource rooms for LD students: A preliminary investigation of the effects on math skills. Learning Disability Quarterly, 7, 69–76.
28.
Vacc, N.N. (1987). Word processor versus handwriting: A comparative study of writing samples produced by mildly mentally handicapped students. Exceptional Children, 54, 156–165.
29.
Withrow, F.B., Withrow, M. S., & Withrow, D.F. (1986). Technology and the handicapped. Technological Horizons in Education Journal, 13(6), 65–67.
