This study examined the homework practices of 88 teachers of students with learning disabilities. While the findings indicated that the respondents were using several quality homework practices, some problems were noted. Suggestions for improving the homework procedures of teachers of students with learning disabilities are presented.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Austin, J.D. (1979). Homework research in mathematics. School Science and Mathematics, 2, 115–121.
2.
Coulter, F. (1980). Secondary school network co-operative research report No. 7. Perth, Australia: University of Western Australia Education Department and Perth Department of Education. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 209200)
3.
Freisen, C.D. (1978). The results of surveys, questionnaires and polls regarding homework. Iowa City: University of Iowa. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 159174)
4.
Harvard Education Letter. (January, 1985). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
5.
Keith, T. (1982). Time spent on homework and high school grades: A large-sample path analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 74, 248–253.
6.
Kerzig, R.L. (1966). The value of homework. The Clearing House, 41, 140–142.
7.
Knorr, C.L. (1981). A synthesis of homework research and related literature. Bethlehem, PA: Lehigh University. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 199933)
8.
Leconte, R.T. (1981). Homework as a learning experience. What research says to the teacher. Washington, DC: National Education Association. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 217022).
9.
Lee, J.F., & Pruitt, K.W. (1979). Homework assignments: Classroom games or teaching tools?The Clearing House, 53, 31–37.
10.
Schiller, B. (1954). A questionnaire study of junior high school students' reaction to homework. High Points, 26, 23–26. Phi Delta Kappan, 65, 423–426.
11.
United States Department of Education. (1987). What works. Research about teaching and learning. Pueblo, CO: Author.
12.
Walberg, H.J. (1984). Families as partners in educational productivity. Phi Delta Kappan, 65, 397–400.
