Crowder, R.C. (1984). Is it just reading?Developmental Review, 4, 48–61.
2.
Dunn, L.M., & Markwardt, F.C. (1970). Peabody individual achievement test: Manual. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
3.
Hartlage, L., & Steele, C. (1977). WISC and WISC-R correlates of academic achievement. Psychology in the Schools, 14, 15–18.
4.
Henderson, N., Fay, W., Lindemann, S., & Clarkson, O. (1973). Will the IQ test ban decrease the effectiveness of reading prediction?Journal of Educational Psychology, 65, 345–355.
5.
Jastak, J.F., & Jastak, S. (1978). The wide range achievement test (rev. ed.). Wilmington, DE: Jastak Associates.
6.
Kaufman, A. (1973). Comparison of the WPPSI, Stanford-Binet, and McCarthy scales as predictors of first-grade achievement. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 36, 67–73.
7.
Perfetti, C.A. (1984). Reading acquisition and beyond: Decoding includes cognition. American Journal of Education, 33, 40–61.
8.
Sewell, T., & Severson, R. (1974). Learning ability and intelligence as cognitive predictors of achievement in first-grade black children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 66, 948–955.
9.
Siegel, L.S. (1988). Evidence that IQ scores are irrelevant to the definition and analysis of reading disability. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 42, 201–215.
10.
Stanovich, K.E. (1986). Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 21, 360–406.
11.
Stanovich, K.E. (1988). The right and wrong places to look for the cognitive focus of reading disability. Paper presented at a meeting of the Orton Dyslexia Society, New York.
12.
Stanovich, K.E., Cunningham, A.E., & Feeman, D.J. (1984). Intelligence, cognitive skills, and early reading progress. Reading Research Quarterly, 24, 278–303.
13.
Stevenson, H.W., Parker, T., Wilkinson, A., Hegion, A., & Fish, E. (1976). Longitudinal study of individual differences in cognitive development and scholastic achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 68, 377–400.
14.
Torgesen, J.K. (1988). Thinking about the future by distinguishing between issues that have answers and those that do not. In S.T. Vaughn & C.S. Bos (Eds.), Issues and future directions for research in learning disabilities. San Diego: College Hill Press.
15.
Torgesen, J.K., Dahlem, W.E., & Greenstein, J. (1987). Using verbatim text recordings to enhance reading comprehension in learning disabled adolescents. Learning Disabilities Focus, 3, 30–38.
16.
Van den Bos, K.P. (in press). Relationship between cognitive development, decoding skill, and reading comprehension in learning disabled children. In P.G. Aaron & R.M. Joshi (Eds.), Reading and writing disorders in different orthographies. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
17.
Wong, B.Y.L. (1986). Problems and issues in the definition of learning disabilities. In J.K. Torgesen & B.Y.L. Wong (Eds.), Psychological and educational perspectives on learning disabilities (pp. 1–25). San Diego: Academic Press.
18.
Woodcock, R. W. (1978). Development and standardization of the Woodcock-Johnson Psycho-Educational Battery. Hingham, MA: Teaching Resources.