Angoff, W.H. (1988). The nature–nurture debate, aptitudes, and group differences. American Psychologist, 43, 713–720.
2.
Bradley, L. (1987, December). Categorising sounds, early intervention and learning to read: A follow-up study. Paper presented at the meeting of the British Psychological Society, London.
3.
Bradley, L. (1988). Making connections in learning to read and to spell. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 2, 3–18.
4.
Bradley, L., & Bryant, P.E. (1983). Categorizing sounds and learning to read—A causal connection. Nature, 301, 419–421.
5.
Bradley, L., & Bryant, P.E. (1985). Rhyme and reason in reading and spelling. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Ellis, A.W. (1985). The cognitive neuropsychology of developmental (and acquired) dyslexia: A critical survey. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 2, 169–205.
8.
Gough, P.B., & Tunmer, W.E. (1986). Decoding, reading, and reading disability. Remedial and Special Education, 7(1), 6–10.
9.
Jorm, A. (1983). Specific reading retardation and working memory: A review. British Journal of Psychology, 74, 311–342.
10.
Lundberg, I., Frost, J., & Peterson, O. (1988). Effects of an extensive program for stimulating phonological awareness in preschool children. Reading Research Quarterly, 23, 263–284.
11.
Maclean, M., Bryant, P., & Bradley, L. (1987). Rhymes, nursery rhymes, and reading in early childhood. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 33, 255–281.
12.
Morais, J., Alegria, J., & Content, A. (1987). The relationships between segmental analysis and alphabetic literacy: An interactive view. Cahiers Psychologie Cognitive, 7, 415–438.
13.
Olson, R., Kliegl, R., Davidson, B., & Foltz, G. (1985). Individual and developmental differences in reading disability. In T. Waller (Ed.), Reading research: Advances in theory and practice (Vol. 4, pp. 1–64). London: Academic Press.
14.
Perfetti, C.A. (in press). The representation problem in reading acquisition. In P. Gough (Ed.), Reading acquisition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
15.
Perfetti, C.A., Beck, I., Bell, L., & Hughes, C. (1987). Phonemic knowledge and learning to read are reciprocal: A longitudinal study of first grade children. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 33, 283–319.
16.
Satz, P., Morris, R., & Fletcher, J.M. (1985). Hypotheses, subtypes, and individual differences in dyslexia: Some reflections. In D.B. Gray & J.F. Kavanagh (Eds.), Biobehavioral measures of dyslexia (pp. 25–40). Parkton, MD: New York Press.
17.
Scarborough, H.S. (1984). Continuity between childhood dyslexia and adult reading. British Journal of Psychology, 75, 329–348.
18.
Schiff, M., & Lewontin, R. (1986). Education and class. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
19.
Seidenberg, M.S., Bruck, M., Fornarolo, G., & Backman, J. (1985). Word recognition processes of poor and disabled readers: Do they necessarily differ?Applied Psycholinguistics, 6, 161–180.
20.
Share, D.L., McGee, R., McKenzie, D., Williams, S., & Suva, P.A. (1987). Further evidence relating to the distinction between specific reading retardation and general reading backwardness. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 5, 35–44.
21.
Silva, P.A., McGee, R., & Williams, S. (1985). Some characteristics of 9-year-old boys with general reading backwardness or specific reading retardation. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 26, 407–421.
22.
Stanovich, K.E. (1986a). Cognitive processes and the reading problems of learning disabled children: Evaluating the assumption of specificity. In J. Torgesen & B. Wong (Eds.), Psychological and educational perspectives on learning disabilities (pp. 87–113). New York: Academic Press.
23.
Stanovich, K.E. (1986b). Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 21, 360–407.
24.
Stanovich, K.E. (1987). Perspectives on segmental analysis and alphabetic literacy. Cahiers Psychologie Cognitive, 7, 514–519.
25.
Stanovich, K.E. (1988). Explaining the differences between the dyslexic and the garden-variety poor reader: The phonological-core variable-difference model. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 21, 590–604, 612.
26.
Stanovich, K.E. (in press). Has the LD field lost its intelligence?Journal of Learning Disabilities.
27.
Stanovich, K.E., & West, R.F. (1988). Exposure to print and orthographic processing. Unpublished manuscript.
28.
Stanovich, K.E., West, R.F., & Cunningham, A.E. (1989, March). The relative independence of phonological and orthographic processing in reading. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.
29.
Stanovich, K.E., West, R.F., & Cunningham, A.E. (in press). Beyond phonological processes: Print exposure and orthographic processing. In S. Brady & D. Shankweiler (Eds.), Phonological processes in literacy. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
30.
Stevenson, J., Graham, P., Fredman, G., & McLoughlin, V. (1987). A twin study of genetic influences on reading and spelling ability and disability. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 28, 229–247.