Do Children with Learning Disabilities Outgrow Deficits in Selective Auditory Attention? Evidence from Dichotic Listening in Adults with Learning Disabilities
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online December, 1988
Do Children with Learning Disabilities Outgrow Deficits in Selective Auditory Attention? Evidence from Dichotic Listening in Adults with Learning Disabilities
Previous research suggests that children with learning disabilities (LD) evidence similar degrees of cerebral lateralization as nondisabled children, but they perform at a degraded level due to deficits in selective attention. The developmental lag hypothesis predicts that these deficits should attenuate in children with LD with maturity. The present study examined this notion by evaluating dichotic listening ability using both free recall and directed attention conditions in 24 adults with LD and their age- and sex-matched controls. Dichotic syllables, words, and sentences were employed. The results indicated similar degrees of cerebral lateralization but significantly degraded levels of accuracy in the adults with LD in the free recall and directed attention conditions across all levels of semantic processing. Thus, it would appear that adults with LD evidence similar deficits in lateralized selective auditory linguistic processing as found in children with LD.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Belmore, S.M. (1980). Depth of processing and ear differences in memory for sentences. Neuropsychologia, 18, 657–663.
2.
Bever, T.G. (1971). The nature of cerebral dominance in speech behavior of the child and adult. In R. Huxley & E. Ingram (Eds.), Language acquisition: Models and methods (pp. 217–292) New York: Academic Press.
3.
Bryden, M.P., & Allard, F. (1978). Dichotic listening and the development of linguistic processes. In M. Kinsbourne (Ed.), Asymmetrical function of the brain (pp. 392–404) New York: Cambridge University Press.
4.
Bryden, M.P., Munhall, K., & Allard, F. (1983). Attentional biases and the right-ear effect in dichotic listening. Brain and Language, 18, 236–248.
5.
Critchley, M. (1970). The dyslexic child. London: Heinemann.
6.
Hellige, J.B. (1983). The study of cerebral hemisphere differences: Introduction and overview. In J.B. Hellige (Ed.), Cerebral hemisphere asymmetry: Method, theory, and application (pp. 1–17) New York: Praeger.
7.
Hynd, G.W., Cohen, M., & Obrzut, J.E. (1983). Dichotic consonant-vowel (CV) testing in the diagnosis of learning disabilities in children. Ear and Hearing, 4(1), 283–286.
8.
Hynd, G.W., & Obrzut, J.E. (1977). Effects of grade level and sex on the magnitude of the dichotic ear advantage. Neuropsychologia, 15, 689–692.
9.
Hynd, G.W., Obrzut, J.E., Weed, W., & Hynd, C.R. (1979). Development of cerebral dominance: Dichotic listening asymmetry in normal and learning-disabled children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 28, 445–454.
Kimura, D. (1961). Cerebral dominance and the perception of verbal stimuli. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 15, 166–171.
12.
Kimura, D. (1963). Speech lateralization in young children as determined by an auditory test. Journal of Comparative Physiological Psychology, 56, 899–902.
13.
Kinsbourne, M. (1970). The cerebral basis of lateral asymmetries in attention. Acta Psychologica, 33, 193–201.
14.
Lenneberg, E.H. (1967). Biological foundations of language. New York: Wiley.
15.
Obrzut, J.E., & Hynd, G.W. (1981). Cognitive development and cerebral lateralization in children with learning disabilities. International Journal of Neuroscience, 14, 139–145.
16.
Obrzut, J.E., Hynd, G.W., & Bolick-Uphoff, C. (1986). Lateral asymmetries in learning disabled children: A review. In S.J. Ceci (Ed.), Handbook of cognitive, social, and neuropsychological aspects of learning disabilities (pp. 441–473) Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
17.
Obrzut, J.E., Hynd, G.W., Obrzut, A., & Pirozzolo, F.J. (1981). Effects of directed attention on cerebral asymmetries in normal and learning-disabled children. Developmental Psychology, 17(1), 118–125.
18.
Oldfield, R.C. (1971). The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh Handedness Inventory. Neuropsychologia, 9, 97–113.
19.
Orton, S.T. (1937). Reading, writing, and speech problems in children. New York: Norton.
20.
Porter, R.J., & Hughes, L.F. (1983). Dichotic listening to CVs: Method, interpretation, and application. In J.B. Hellige (Ed.), Cerebral hemisphere asymmetry: Method, theory, and application (pp. 177–218) New York: Praeger.
21.
Satz, P. (1976). Cerebral dominance and reading disability: An old problem revisited. In R.M. Knights & D.J. Bakker (Eds.), The neuropsychology of learning disorders (pp. 273–294) Baltimore: University Park Press.
22.
Satz, P., Rardin, D., & Ross, J. (1971). An evaluation of a theory of specific developmental dyslexia. Child Development, 42, 2009–2021.
23.
Satz, P., Taylor, H.G., Friel, J., & Fletcher, J.M. (1978). Some developmental and predictive precursors of reading disabilities: A six year follow-up. In A.L. Benton & D. Pearl (Eds.), Dyslexia: An appraisal of current knowledge (pp. 313–348) New York: Oxford University Press.
24.
Schulman-Galambos, C. (1977). Dichotic listening performance in elementary and college students. Neuropsychologia, 15, 577–584.
25.
Sommers, R.K., & Taylor, M.L. (1972). Cerebral speech dominance in language-disordered and normal children. Cortex, 8, 224–232.
26.
Wechsler, D. (1981). Wechsler adult intelligence scale-Revised. New York: Psychological Corp.
