Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Males with learning disabilities in Grades 1 through 4 were pretested to determine subjects who were in the acquisition stage of decoding. Forty-eight boys were randomly assigned to four feedback treatment conditions and orally read consonant-vowel-consonant (CVC) nonsense words. Four feedback treatments were manipulated as the independent variable: (a) general, (b) corrective/modeling, (c) corrective/sound-it-out, and (d) no feedback. A one-way analysis of variance revealed a significant difference between types of feedback. Planned orthogonal comparisons demonstrated significant differences for (a) any type of feedback compared to no feedback, (b) corrective feedback (modeling and sound-it-out) compared to general feedback, and (c) modeling compared to sound-it-out on the immediate task measure. Additional discussion suggests implications for instructional practices and critical variables to consider in feedback research.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Barringer, C. , & Gholson, G. (1979). Effects of type and combination of feedback upon conceptual learning by children. Implications for research in academic learning. Review of Educational Research, 49, 459–478.

Bloom, R.B. , & Bourdon, L. (1980). Types and frequencies of teachers' written instructional feedback. Journal of Educational Research, 74, 13–15.

Cohen, S.B. , Perkins, V.L. , & Newmark, S. (1985). Written feedback strategies used by special education teachers. Teacher Education and Special Education, 8, 183–187.

D'Angelo, K. (1982). Correction behavior: Implications for reading instruction. The Reading Teacher, 35, 395–398.

Fleisher, L.S. , & Jenkins, J.R. (1983). The effect of word- and comprehension-emphasis instruction on reading performance. Learning Disability Quarterly, 6, 146–154.

Grimes, L. (1981). Error analysis and error correction procedures. Teaching Exceptional Children, 14, 17–20.

Haring, N.C. , Lovitt, T.C. , Eaton, M.D. , & Hansen, C.L. (1978). The fourth R: Research in the classroom. Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merrill.

Jenkins, J.R. , & Larson, K. (1979). Evaluating error-correction procedures for oral reading. The Journal of Special Education, 13, 145–156.

Jenkins, J.R. , Larson, K. , & Fleisher, L. (1983). Effects of error correction on word recognition and reading comprehension. Learning Disability Quarterly, 6, 139–145.

10.

Kochnower, J. , Richardson, E. , & DiBenedetto, B. (1983). A comparison of the phonic decoding ability of normal and learning disabled children. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 16, 348–351.

11.

Kulhavy, R.W. (1977). Feedback in written instruction. Review of Educational Research, 47, 211–232.

12.

Leslie, L. , & Osol, P. (1978). Changes in oral reading strategies as a function of quantities of miscues. Journal of Reading Behavior, 10, 442–445.

13.

Mims, R.M. , & Gholson, B. (1977). Effects of type and amount of feedback upon hypothesis sampling systems among 7 and 8 year old children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 24, 358–371.

14.

Noble, C.E. (1961). Measurements of association value (a), rated associations (a'), and scaled meaningfulness (m') for the 2100 CVC combinations of the English alphabet. Psychological Reports, 8, 489–521.

15.

Pascarella, E.T. , & Pflaum, S.W. (1981). The interaction of children's attribution and level of control over error correction in reading instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 73, 533–540.

16.

Pflaum, S.W. , & Bryan, T.H. (1930). Oral reading behaviors in the learning disabled. Journal of Educational Research, 73, 252–258.

17.

Rose, T.L. , McEntire, E. , & Dowdy, C. (1982). Effects of two error-correction procedures on oral reading. Learning Disability Quarterly, 5, 100–105.

18.

Smith, D.D. (1981). Teaching the learning disabled. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.

Feedback Effects on Oral Reading Errors of Children with Learning Disabilities

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References