Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Many students who repeatedly fail foreign language requirements, in spite of intensive tutoring, high academic potential, and motivation, are being referred to programs for learning disabled university students. Guidelines for diagnosing a disability in learning a foreign language, however, are not available. This research presents a method for identifying predictors of success in learning a foreign language at the university level and compares the performance of students identified as learning disabled on these predictors. The scores of regular students enrolled in introductory foreign language classes on the Modern Language Aptitude Test were compared with their foreign language course performance. The fourth and fifth subtests predicted a relationship to learning a foreign language. In addition, university learning disabled students exhibited significantly lower performance on all five of the Modern Language Aptitude subtests. The results of this study suggest that the information provided by the Modern Language Aptitude Test (especially the fourth and fifth subtests) is potentially valuable to the diagnostic process.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Allen, D. , & Natelson, E.R. (1977). Prediction of success in French, German, and Russian foreign language learning. An analyses of FY 67-74 student data. Washington, DC: Central Intelligence Agency. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 134 026)

Ayers, J.B., Bustamante, F.A. , & Campana, P.J. (1973). Prediction of success in college foreign language courses. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 33, 939-942.

Boder, E. (1973). Developmental dyslexia: A diagnostic approach based on three atypical reading-spelling patterns. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 15, 663-687.

Carroll, J.B. (1962). The prediction of success in intensive foreign language training. In R. Glaser (Ed.), Training, research, and education (pp. 131-151). New York: Wiley.

Carroll, J.B. , & Sapon, S.M. (1959). Modern language aptitude test (Form A). New York: Psychological Corp.

Clyde-Snyder, H. (1981). Criterion and behavior checklist for adults with specific learning disabilities. In the HELDS Project Series, Appendix A (pp. 25-27). Central Washington University, Ellensburg, WA.

Denckla, M.P. (1977). Minimal brain dysfunction and dyslexia: Beyond diagnosis by exclusion. In M.E. Blaw, I. Rapin, & M. Kinsbourne (eds.), Child neurology, New York: Spectrum.

Dinklage, K.T. (1971). Inability to learn a foreign language. In G. Blaine & C. McArthur (eds.), Emotional problems of the student (pp. 185-206). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

Dinklage, K.T. (1985). Regarding college students' inability to learn a foreign language. paper presented at the annual meeting of the Modern Language Association, Boston.

10.

Fife, R.H. (1931). A summary of the reports on the modern foreign languages (Report issued by the Modern Foreign Language Study and the Canadian Committee on Modern Languages). New York: Macmillan.

11.

Gardner, R.C. , & Lambert, W.E. (1972). Attitudes and motivation in second language learning. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.

12.

Hallahan, D.P. , & Kaufmann, J.S. (1982). Introduction to learning disabilities: A psychobehavioral approach. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

13.

Ingram, R.S., Mason, A.W. , & Blackburn, I.A. (1970). A retrospective study of 82 children with reading disability. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 12, 271-279.

14.

Keeney, L. , & Smith N. (1984). Foreign language modifications for disabled students—the campus response. AHSSPPE Bulletin, 2(1), 4-5.

15.

Lutz, M. (1967). The development of foreign language aptitude tests: A review of the literature (Test developmental report TDR-66-4). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.

16.

Meier, J.H. (1971). Prevalence and characteristics of learning disabilities found in second grade children. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 4, 1-16.

17.

Myklebust, H.R. (1965). Development and disorders of written language. Vol. 1, Picture story language test. New York: Grune & Stratton.

18.

Paivio, A. , & Desrochers, A. (1981). Mnemonic techniques in second-language proficiency. Journal of Educational Psychology, 73, 780-795.

19.

Pressley, M. , Levin, J.R., Nakamura, G.V., Hope, D.J., Bispo, J.G. , & Toye, A.R. (1980). The keyword method of foreign vocabulary learning: An investigation of its generalizability. Journal of Applied Psychology, 8, 53-58.

20.

Rosenthal, T.H. (1970). A preliminary psycholignuistic study of children with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 3, 391-395.

21.

Semel, E.M. , & Wiig, E.H. (1975). Comprehension of syntactic structures and critical verbal elements in children with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 8, 53-58.

22.

Wechsler, D. (1981). Wechsler adult intelligence scale-Revised. New York: Psychological Corp.

23.

Wiig, E.H. , & Roach, M.A. (1975). Immediate recall of semantically varied “sentences” by learning-disabled adolescents. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 40, 119-125.

24.

Wiig, E.H. , & Semel, E.M. (1976). Language disabilities in children and adolescents. Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merrill.

25.

Williams, S.B. , & Leavitt, H.J. (1947). Predicting success in learning Japanese. Journal of Applied Psychology, 31, 164-168.

26.

Woodcock, R. (1978). Woodcock-Johnson psycho-educational battery. Hingham, MA: Teaching Resources Corp.

Foreign Language Learning Disabilities

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References