A comprehensive survey of 200 student folders revealed that elementary school (ES) nonpromotion is primarily associated with low academic achievement and low IQ, whereas a junior high school (JHS) nonpromotion is mainly correlated to behavioral suspensions and excessive absenteeism. Having an ES nonpromotion increases the risk of a later grade retention five fold. During the year following an ES nonpromotion, the behavioral and academic outcome is significantly improved and is generally satisfactory. This is clearly not the case after a JHS grade retention.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Abidin, R.R., Golladay, W.M. & Howerton, A.L.Elementary school retention: an unjustifiable, discriminatory and noxious educational policy. Journal of School Psychology, 1971, 9, 410–417.
2.
Ackerman, P.J., Dykman, R.A., & Peters, J.D.Teenage status of hyperactive and nonhyperactive learning disabled boys. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 1977, 47, 577–596.
3.
American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, 3rd Edition. Washington, D.C.: American Psychiatric Association, 1980.
4.
Ames, L.B.Retention in grade can be a step forward. Education Digest, March 1981, 46, 36–37.
5.
Bachman, J.G., Green, S. & Wirtanen, I.D.Dropping out: Problem or symptom?Ann Arbor, Michigan: Institute for Social Research, 1971.
6.
ERIC Clearinghouse on Educational Management. Synthesis of research on grade retention and social promotion. Educational Leadership, 1982, 39, 471–473.
Fiske, E.B.Third of city high school students are chronically absent from class. New York Times, 1983, pp. 1 & 34.
9.
Funk, H.D.Nonpromotion teaches children they are inferior. Education Digest, 1969, 35(3), 38–39.
10.
Hinton, G.G. & Knights, R.M.Children with learning problems: Academic history, academic prediction, and adjustment three years after assessment. Exceptional Children, 1971, 37, 513–518.
11.
Holmes, C.T. & Matthews, K.M.The effects of nonpromotion on elementary and junior high school pupils: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 1984, 54, 225–236.
12.
Horn, W.F., O'Donnell, J.P. & Vitulano, L.A.Long term follow-up studies of learning disabled persons. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1983, 16, 542–555.
13.
Jackson, G.B.The research evidence on the effects of grade retention. Review of Educational Research, 1975, 45, 613–635.
14.
Kamii, C.K. & Weikart, D.P. Marks, achievement and intelligence of seventh graders who were retained (nonpromoted) once in elementary school. Journal of Educational Research, 1963, 56, 452–459.
15.
Leschred, A.W., Coolman, M., & Williams, S.Addressing the needs of school failures in a delinquent population. Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Ontario Psychological Association, Toronto, Canada, February, 1983.
16.
May, D.C. & Welch, E.L.The effects of developmental placement and early retention on children's later scores on standardized tests. Psychology in the Schools, 1984, 21, 381–385.
17.
McElwee, E.W.A comparison of the personality traits of 300 accelerated, normal and retarded children. Journal of Educational Research, 1932, 26, 31–34.
18.
Meltzer, L.J., Levine, M.D., Karniski, W., Palfrey, J.S., & Clarke, S.An analysis of the learning styles of adolescent delinquents. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1984, 17, 600–608.
19.
Mendelson, W., Johnson, N. & Stewart, M.A.Hyperactive children as teenagers. A follow-up study. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 1971, 153, 273–279.
20.
Meussen, E.J.A determination of the effect of retardation in students. University of Michigan, 1952. Quoted in To promote or not promote. Journal of Education, February, 1954, 136, 55–56 & 58.
21.
Pulkkinen, L.Long-term studies on the characteristics of aggressive and non-aggressive juveniles. In P.F. Brain & D. Benton (Eds.), Multidisciplinary Approaches to Aggression Research. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1981, pp. 225–243.
22.
Reinherz, H. & Griffin, C.L.The second time around. School Counselor, 1970, 17, 213–218.
23.
Rose, J.S., Medway, F.J., Cantrell, V.L., & Marus, S.H.A fresh look at the retention-promotion controversy. Journal of School Psychology, 1983, 21, 201–211.
24.
Safer, D.Subgrouping conduct disordered adolescents by early risk factors. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 1984, 54, 603–612.
25.
Safer, D., Heaton, R. & Allen, R.Socioeconomic factors influencing the rate of nonpromotion in elementary schools. Peabody Journal of Education, 1977, 54, 275–281.
26.
Sandin, A.A.Social and emotional adjustments of regularly promoted pupils. New York: Teachers College, Columbia University, 1944.
27.
Snipes, W.T.Promotion and moving. Elementary School Journal, 1965, 65, 429–433.
28.
Walker, N.W.Elementary school retention: avoiding abuses through systematic decision making. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 1984, 18, 1–6.
29.
Weiss, G., Minde, K., Werry, J.S., Douglas, V. & Nemeth, E.Studies on the hyperactive child. VIII. Five year follow-up. Archives of General Psychiatry, 1971, 24, 409–414.
30.
Zarb, J.M.A comparison of remedial, failure, and successful secondary school students across self-perception and past and present school performance variables. Adolescence, 1984, 19, 335–348.
