This study identified the social skill competencies necessary for successful performance in secondary mainstream settings as judged by a sample group of 334 regular and special educators. The implications of the findings are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Budoff, M., &Gottlieb, J. (1976). Special class EMR children mainstreamed: A study of an aptitude (learning potential) X treatment interaction. American Journal of Mental Deficiency81, 1–11.
2.
Carlberg, C., &Kavale, K. (1980). The efficacy of special versus regular class placements for exceptional children: A meta-analysis. Journal of Special Education14, 295–309.
3.
Christopher, R., &Renz, P.A. (1969). A critical examination of special education programs. Journal of Special Education, 3, 371–380.
Dunn, L.M. (1968). Special education for the mildly retarded-Is much of it justifiable?Exceptional Children, 3, 371–379.
6.
Flanagan, J. (1972). Measuring human performance. Pittsburgh: American Institutes for Research.
7.
Glavin, J.P. (1973). Follow-up research in resource rooms. Exceptional Children40, 211–213.
8.
Goodman, G. (1979). From residential treatment to community based education: A model for reintegration. Education and Training of the Mentally Retarded14, 95–100.
9.
Gottleib, J. (1981). Mainstreaming: Fulfilling The Promise. American Journal of Mental Deficiency86, 115–126.
10.
Gresham, F.M. (1982). Misguided mainstreaming: The case for social skills treining with handicapped children. Exceptional Children, 48422–433.
11.
Grosenick, J.K. (1971). Integration of exceptional children into regular classes: Research and procedure. Focus on Exceptional Children3, 1–9.
12.
Haring, N.G., &Krug, D.A. (1975). Placement in regular programs: Procedures and results. Exceptional Children41, 413–417.
13.
Hundert, J. (1982). Some considerations of planning the integration of handicapped children into the mainstream. Journal of Learning Disabilities15, 73–80.
14.
Idol-Maestas, L.A. (1981). A teacher training model: The resourcelconsulting teacher. Behavioral Disorders, 6, 108–121.
15.
MacMillan, D.L., &Semmel, M.I. (1977). Evaluation of mainstreaming programs. Focus on Exceptional Children9, 1–14.
16.
Miller, T.L., &Sabatino, D.A. (1978). An evaluation of the teacher consultant model as an approach to mainstreaming. Exceptional Children45, 86–91.
17.
Palmer, D.J. (1980). Factors to be considered in placing handicapped children in regular education classes. Journal of School Psychology18, 163–171.
18.
Rueda, R.S., Rodriguez, R.F., &Prieto, A.G. (1981). Teachers' perceptions of competencies for instructing bilingual/multicultural exceptional children. Exceptional Children48, 268–270.
19.
Salend, S.J. (1984). Factors contributing to the development of successful mainstreaming programs. Exceptional Children50, 409–416.
20.
Salend, S.J., Brooks, L., &Salend, S.M. (1985). Identifying school districts policies for implementing mainstreaming. Manuscript submitted for publication.
21.
Salend, S.J., &Hankee, C. (1981). Successful mainstreaming: A form of communication. Education Unlimited3, 47–48.
22.
Salend, S.J. &Johns, J. (1983). Changing teacher commitment to mainstreaming Teaching Exceptional Children, 15, 82–85.
23.
Salend, S.J., &Lutz, J.G. (1984). Mainstreaming or mainlining: A competency based approach to mainstreaming. Journal of Learning Disabilities17, 27–29.
24.
Salend, S.J., &Vigliail, D. (1982). Preparing secondary students for the mainstream. Teaching Exceptional Children14, 137–140.
25.
Wilkes, H.H., &Bireley, I.K., &Schultz, J.J. (1979). Criteria for mainstreaming the learning disabled child into the regular classes. Journal of Learning Disabilities12, 46–51.
26.
Zigler, E., &Muenchow, S. (1979). Mainstreaming: The proof is in the implementation. American Psychologist34, 993–996.
