The enormous literature on remedial procedures with mildly handicapped children contains many convincing demonstrations that specific instructional techniques can be effective in accomplishing narrowly defined goals. However, when the focus of evaluation shifts to more complex programs that are designed to achieve a more complete remediation of academic skill deficits, the results have often been discouraging. This Topical Review critically examines previous attempts to evaluate the efficiacy of special education programs for mildly handicapped children. The author suggests that serious methodological flaws in these evaluation efforts make our present knowledge in this area very weak. The final section of the review proposes a methodology that is designed to address and overcome many of the limitations of previous research.—JKT
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Abidin, R.R.Seltzer, J. (1981). Special education outcomes: Implications for implementation of Public Law 94–142. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 14(1), 28–31.
2.
Anderson, R.C. (1972). How to construct achievement tests to assess comprehension. Review of Educational Research, 42, 145–170.
3.
Ashburn, S.H. (1976). Comprehensive support services program for serving pupils with special education needs. Ithaca, NY: Tompkins-Seneca-Tioga Board of Cooperative Education Services. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 130 491)
4.
Bacher, J.H. (1965). The effect of special class placement on the self-concept, social adjustment, and reading growth of slow learners. (Doctoral dissertation, New York University, 1964). Dissertation Abstracts, 25, 7071.
5.
Balliet, T.A. (1983). Learning disabilities: Program evaluation, Janesville, WI: Janesville Joint District 1. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 238 241)
6.
Balow, B., Fuchs, D., Kasbohm, M. (1978). Teaching nonreaders to read: An evaluation of the basic skills in Minneapolis. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 11(6), 24–27.
7.
Beck, F.W., Lindsey, J.D., Frith, G.H. (1981). Effects of self-contained special class placement on intellectual functioning on learning disabled students. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 14(5), 280–282.
8.
Berqquist, C.G. (1982). A methodology for validating placement of children in exceptional child programs. Exceptional Children, 49(3), 269–270.
9.
Bersell, G.L.Balliet, T. (1981). Learning disabilities: Program evaluation. Janesville, WI: Janesville Joint District 1. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 277 635)
10.
Bersoff, D.N., Kabler M., Ficus, E., Ankney, R. (1972). Effectiveness of special class placement for children labeled neurologically handicapped. Journal of School Psycholgoy, 10(2), 157–163.
11.
Blatt, B. (1958). The physical, personality, and academic status of children who are mentally retarded attending special classes as compared with children who are mentally retarded attending regular classes. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 62, 810–818.
12.
Blait, B.Garfunkel, F. (1973). Teaching the mentally retarded. In R. Travers (Ed.) Second handbook of research on teaching. Chicago: Rand McNally.
13.
Bohannon, R. (1975). Direct and daily measurement procedures in the identification and treatment of reading behaviors of children in special education. Unpublished Doctoral dissertation, University of Washington.
14.
Bardfield, R.H., Brown, J., Kaplan, P, Rickert, E., Stannard, R. (1973). The special child in the regular classroom. Exceptional Children, 39(5), 384–390.
15.
Brandstetter, G., Merz, C. (1978). Charting scores in precision teaching for skill acquisition. Exceptional Teaching, 45(1), 42–48.
16.
Breuning, S.E. (1978). Precision teaching in the high school classroom: A necessary step towards maximizing teacher effectiveness and student performance. American Educational Review, 15(1), 125–140.
17.
Budoff, M.Gottlieb, J. (1976). Special-class EMR children mainstreamed: A study of an aptitude (learning potential) X treatment interaction. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 81(1), 1–11.
18.
Campbell, D.T.Stanley, J.C. (1963). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Chicago: Rand McNally College Publishing Company.
19.
Calberg, C.Kavale, K. (1980). The efficacy of special versus regular class placement for exceptional children: A meta-analysis. The Journal of Special Education, 14(3), 295–309.
20.
Carroll, A.W. (1967). The effects of segregated and partially integrated school programs on self-concept and academic achievement of educable mentally redardates. Exceptional Children, 34, 93–99.
21.
Carter, J.L. (1975). Intelligence and reading achievement of EMR children in three educational settings. Mental Retardation, 13(5), 26–27.
22.
Cassidy, V.M.Stanton, J.E. (1959). An investigation of factors involved in the educational placement of mentally retarded children. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University, Bureau of Education, Research and Services. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 002 752)
23.
Cook, T.D., Campbell, D.T. (1979). Quasi-experimentation: Design and analysis issues for field settings. Chicago: Rand McNally College Publishing Company.
24.
Cotugno, A.J. (1982). Cognitive control methods in the treatment of special education children. Psychology in the Schools, 1982, 517–525.
25.
Cox, L.M.Wilson, A.P. (1981). A comparison of academic gains in reading among mildly learning disabled students in three program structures. Reading Improvement, 18(2), 132–156.
26.
Deno, S., Chiang, B., Tindal, G., Blackburn, M. (1979). Experimental analysis of program components: An approach to research in CSDCs (Research Report No. 12). Minneapolis, Mn.: University of Minnesota, Institute for Research on Learning Disabilities.
27.
Deno, S., Jenkins, J., Mirkin, p. (1979). Measuring pupil progress toward the least restrictive environment. Learning Disabilities Quarterly, 2(4), 81–92.
28.
Deno, S., Marston, D., Mirkin, P., Lowry, L., Sindelar, P., Jenkins, J. (1982). The use of standard tasks to measure achievement in reading, spelling, and written expression: A normative and developmental study (Research Report No. 87). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota, Institute for Research on Learning Disabilities. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 227 129)
29.
Deno, S.L., Marston, D., Mirkin, P. (1982). Valid measurement procedures for continuous evaluation of written expression. Exceptional Children, 48, 368–371.
30.
Deno, S., Marston, D., Shinn, M., Tindal, G. (1983). Oral reading fluency: A simple datum for scaling reading disability. Topics in Learning and Learning Disability, 2(4), 53–59.
31.
Deno, S., Mirkin, P. (1977). Data-based program modification: A manual. Minneapolis, Minn.: Leadership Training Institute/Special Education, University of Minnesota.
32.
Deno, S.L., Mirkin, P.K., Chiang, B. (1982). Identifying valid measures of reading. Exceptional Children, 49(1), 36–45.
33.
Deno, S., Mirkin, P., Lowry, L., Kuehnle, K. (1980). Relationships among simple measures of spelling and performance on standardized achievement tests. (Research Report No. 21). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota, Institute for Research on Learning Disabilities. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 197 508)
34.
Deno, S.L., Mirkin, P.K., Wesson, C. (1984). Procedures for writing data-based IEPs. Teaching Exceptional Children, 16(2), 94–104.
35.
Elenbogen, M.L. (1957) A comparative study of some aspects of academic and social adjustment of two groups of mentally retarded children in special classes and in regular classes. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Northwestern University, 1957). Dissertation Abstracts, 17, 2496.
36.
Flynn, T.M. (1970). The effect of a parttime special education program on the adjustment of EMR students. Exceptional Children, 36(9), 680–681.
37.
Franklin, G.S.Sparkman, W.E. (1978). The cost effectiveness of two program delivery systems for exceptional children. Journal of Education Finance, 3, 305–314.
38.
Frumess, S.C. (1973). A comparison of management groups involving the use of the standard behavior chart and setting performance aims. Unpublished doctoral dissertion, University of Houston, Houston.
39.
Fuchs, L.S., Deno, S.L., Mirkin, P.K. (1982a). Direct and frequent measurement and evaluation: Effects on instruction and estimates of student progress (Research Report No. 97). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota, Institute for Research on Learning Disabilities. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 226 043)
40.
Fuchs, L.S., Deno, S.L., Mirkin, P.K. (1982b). Effects of frequent curriculum-based measurement and evaluation on student achievement and knowledge of performance: An experimental study (Research Report No. 96). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota, Institute for Research on Learning Disabilities. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 226 045)
41.
Fuchs, L.S., Deno, S.L., Roettger, A. (1983). The effect of alternative data-utilization rules on spelling achievement: An N of 1 study (Research Report No. 120). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota, Institute for Research on Learning Disabilities. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 236 844)
42.
Fuchs, L., Tindal, G., Fuchs, D., Sinn, M., Deno, S., Germann, G. (1983). The technical adequacy of a basal reading mastery test: The Holt basic reading series (Research Report No. 130). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota, Institute for Research on Learning Disabilities.
43.
Fuchs, L., Tindal, G., Shinn, M., Fuchs, D., Deno, S., Germann, G. (1983). Technical adequacy of basal readers' mastery tests: The Ginn 720 series. (Research Report No. 122). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota, Institute for Research on Learning Disabiliteis.
44.
Fuchs, L., Wesson, C., Tindal, G., Mirkin, P., Deno, S. (1982). Instructional changes, student performance, and teacher preferences: The effects of specific measurement and evaluation procedures (Research Report No. 64). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota, Institute for Research on Learning Disabilities. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 218 849)
45.
Germann, G. and Tindal, G. (1983). [Summary report for Pine County Cooperative: 1982-1983]. Unpublished raw data.
46.
Glass, G.V. (1976). Primary, secondary, and meta-analysis of research. Educational Researcher, 5, 3–8.
47.
Glass, G.V. (1977) Integrating findings: The meta-analysis of research. In L. Shulman (Ed.) Review of Research in Education, 5, 351–379.
48.
Glass, G.V. (1980). When educators set standards. In E. L. Baker and E. S. Quellmalz (Eds) Educational testing and evaluation. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
49.
Glass, G.V. (1983). Effectiveness of special education. Policy Studies Review, 2(1), 65–78.
50.
Goldstein, H., Moss, J.W.Jordan, L.J. (1965). The efficacy of special class training on the development of mentally retarded children. Washington, DC: U.S. Office of Education. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 002 907)
51.
Hagin, R.A. (1983). Early intervention with vulnerable children: Results of a demonstration project. Anaheim, CA: Paper presented at the Annual meeting of American Psycholgical Association. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 237 210).
52.
Hall, R.V. (1971). Responsive teaching: Focus on measurement and research in the classroom and the home. Focus on Exceptional Children, 3(7), 1–7.
53.
Hall, R.V., Copeland, R.E. (1971). The responsive teaching model: A first step in shaping school personnel as behavioral modification specialists. Paper presented at the Third Banff International Conference on Behavior Modification, April.
54.
Haring, N.G.Krug. D.A. (1975). Placement in regular programs: Procedures and results. Exceptional Children, 41, 413–417.
55.
Haring, N.G., Lovitt, T. (1969) The application of functional analysis of behavior by teachers in a natural school setting. Unpublished manuscript. Seattle: University of Washington, Experimental Education Unit.
56.
Haring, N.G., Maddox, L., Krug, D.A. (1972). Investigation of systematic instructional procedures to facilitate academic achievement in mentally retarded disadvantaged children. Unpublished manuscript. Seattle: University of Washington, Final Report.
57.
Hawkes, H.E., Lindquist, E. F., Mann, C.R. (1936). The construction and use of achievement examinations. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
58.
Hayes, R.B. (1977). Is special education worth the cost?Paper presented at the Mid-Atlantic Research and Development Association Conference. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. Ed 158 448)
59.
Hersen, M.Barlow, D.H. (1976). Single case experimental designsNew York: Pergammon Press.
60.
Hoeltke, G.M. (1967). Effectiveness of special class placement for educable mentally retarded children. (Doctoral dissertation, University of Nebraska Teachers College, 1966). Disseration Abstracts, 27, 3311a.
61.
Holland, J.W., (1971). The comparative effects of three different programs upon self concept and achievement of the educable mentally retarded. (Doctoral disseration, University of Arkansas, 1971). Disseration Abstracts, 32, 811A.
62.
Idol-Maestas, L., Lloyd, S.Ritter, S. (1982). A model for direct, data based reading instruction. Champaign, II: Department of Special Education, (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 219 738)
63.
Jenkins, J.Pany, D. (1978). Standardized achievement tests: How useful for special education?Exceptional Children, 44, 448–453.
64.
Jenkins, J., Mayhall, W., Peschka, C., Townsend, V. (1974). Using direct and daily measures to increase learning. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 10, 604–608.
65.
Johnson, G.O. (1962). Special education for the mentally handicapped-a paradox. Exceptional Children, 62–69.
66.
Jordan, L.J. (1965). Verbal readiness training for slow-learning children. Mental Retardation, 3, 19–22.
67.
Jordan, T.E.DeCharms, R. (1959). The achievement motive in normal and mentally retarded children. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 64, 457–466.
68.
Kratochwill, T.R. (1978). Single Subject Research: Strategies for evaluating change. New York: Academic Press.
69.
Kavale, K.A.Glass, G.V. (1982). The efficacy of special education intervenetions and practices: A compendium of meta-analysis findings. Focus on Exceptional Children, 15 (4), 1–16.
70.
King, R.P., Deno, S., Mirkin, P., Wesson, C. (1183). The effects of training teachers in the use of formative evaluation in reading: An experimental-control comparison (Research Report No. 111). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota, Institute for Research on Learning Disabilities. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 236 189)
71.
Lakin, K.C. (1983). A response to Gene V. Glass folicy Studies Review, 2(1), 233–240.
72.
Leinhardt, G.Fallay. B. (1982). Restrictive educational settings: Exile or haven. Review of Educational Research, 52(4), 557–578.
73.
Lovitt, T.Eaton, M. (1972). Achievement tests versus direct and daily measurement. In G. Senf (Ed.) Behvior analysis in education, Lawrence, Ks: University of Kansas.
74.
Lew, M., Mesch, D., Lates, B.J. (1982) The Simmons College generic consulting teacher program. TEASE, 5(2), 11–16.
75.
Levine, M. (1976). The academic achievement test: Its historical context and social functions. American Psychologist, 31(3), 228–238.
76.
Lindsley, O.R. (1964). Direct measurement and prothesis of retarded behavior. Journal of Education, 147, 62–81.
77.
Maher, C. (undated). The use of grade and age equivalence scores in educational assessment. Unpublished manuscript.
78.
Marston, D.Deno, S. (1982). Implementation of direct and repeated measurement in the school setting (Research Report No. 106). Minneapolis. MN: University of Minnesota, Institute for Research on Learning Disabiliteis. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 226 048)
79.
Marston, D., Lowry, L., Deno, S., Mirkin, P. (1981). An analysis of learning trends in simple measures of reading, spelling, and written expression: A longitudinal study (Research Report No. 49). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota, Institute for Research on Learning Disabilities.
80.
Marston, D., Tindal, G., Deno, S. (1982). Predictive efficiency of direct, repeated measurement: An analysis of cost and accuracy in classification (Research Report No. 104), Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota, Institute for Research on Learning Disabilities.
81.
Marston, D., Tindal, G., Deno, S. (1984). Eligibility for learning disability services: A direct and repeated measurement approach. Exceptional Children, 50(6), 554–555.
82.
Martin, M. (1982). A comparison of variations in data utilization procedures on the reading performance of mildly handicapped students. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Washington, Seattle.
83.
Miller, T.Sabatino, D.A. (1978). An evaluation of the teacher consultant model as an approach to mainsteaming. Exceptional Children, 45(2), 86–91.
84.
Mirkin, P., Deno, S., Tindal, G., Kuehnle, K. (1982). Frequency of measurement and data utilization strategies as factors in standardized behavioral assessment of academic skill. Journal of Behavioral Assessment, 4(4), 361–370.
85.
Myers, J.K. (1976). The efficacy of the special day school for EMR pupils Mental Retardation, 14(4), 3–11.
86.
Reynolds, R.N., Cober, J.G., Moyer, K.L. (1978). Pennsylvania looks at special education: A two year report. Harrisburg, PA: Pennsylvania State Department of Education (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 155 860).
87.
Ritter D.R. (1978). Surviving in the classroom: A follow-up of mainstreamed children with learning disabilities. Journal of School Psychology, 16(3), 253–256.
88.
Rubin, RA., Krus, P.Balow, B. (1973). Factors in special class placement. Exceptional Children, 525–532.
89.
Rubin, E.Z., Simson, C.B.Betwee, M.C. (1966). Emotionally handicapped children and the elementary school. Detroit. Wayne State University.
90.
Rust, J.O., Miller, L.S., Wilson, W.H. (1978). Using a control group to evaluate a resource room program. Psychology in the Schools, 15(4), 503–506.
91.
Sabatino, D.A. (1971). An evaluation of resource rooms for children with learning disabilities. Journal of learning Disabilities, 4(2), 27–35.
92.
Salvia, J.Ysseldyke, J. (1981). Assessment in special and remedial education. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
93.
Sapir, S.G. (1967). The prevention of learning disability through deficit centered classroom training. New York, NY: Columbia University: (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 113 403).
94.
Schell. J.S. (1959). Some differences between mentally retarded children in special and in regular classes in the schools of Mercer County, Pennsylvania. (Doctoral dissertation, The Pennsylvania State University, 1959). Dissertation Abstracts, 20, 607–608.
95.
Shinn, M. and Marston, D. (1984). [Evaluation of the effectiveness of special education for the mildly handicapped students, grades one to six, using curricular based measurement procedures]. Unpublished raw date.
96.
Sindeiar, P.T.Deno, S.L. (1978). The effectiveness of resource programming. Journal of Special Education12(1), 17–28.
97.
Skiba, R., Marston, D., Wesson, C., Sevcik, B., Deno, S. (1983). Characteristics of the time-series data collected through curriculum-based reading measurement (Research Report No. 125). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota, Institute for Research on Learning Disabilities. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 236 197).
98.
Skiba, R., Wesson, C., Deno, S.L. (1982). The effects of training teachers in the use of formative evaluation in reading: An experimental-control comparison (Research Report No. 88). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota, Institute for Research on Learning Disabilities. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. Ed 228 821).
99.
Smith, H.W.Kennedy, W.A. (1967). Effects of three educational programs on mentally retarded children. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 24, 174.
100.
Stanton, J.E.Cassidy, V.M. (1964). Effectiveness of special classes for educable mentally retarded. Mental Retardation, 2(1), 8–13.
101.
Stedman, D.J. (1983). How can special education be coordinated with other delivery systems?Policy Studies Review, 2(1), 113–130.
102.
Stephens, T.M. (1976). Directive teaching of children with learning and behavioral handicaps (2nd ed). Columbus, Ohio: Charles E. Merrill.
103.
Tilley, B.K. (1971). The effects of three educational placement systems on achievement, self-concept, and behavior in elementary mentally retarded children. (Doctoral dissertation, University of Iova, 1970). Dissertation Abstracts, 31, 4590a.
104.
Tindal. G., Fuchs, L., Fuchs, D., Shinn, M., Deno, S., Germann, G. (1983). The technical adequacy of a basal series mastery test: The Scott Foresman reading program. (Research Report No. 128). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota, Institute for Research on Learning Disabilities.
105.
Tindal, G., Germann, G., Deno, S. (1983). Descriptive research on the Pine County norms: A compilation of findings (Research Report No. 132). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota, Institute for Research on Learning Disabilities.
106.
Tindal, G., Germann, G., Marston, D., Deno, S. (1983). The effectiveness of special education: A direct measurement approach (Research Report No. 123). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota, Institute for Research on Learning Disabilities. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 236 846).
107.
Tindal, G., Marston, D., Deno, S. (1983). The reliability of direct and repeated measurement (Research Report No. 109). Minnespolis, MN: University of Minnesota, Institute for Research on Learning Disabilities.
108.
Tindal, G., Shinn, M., Fuchs, L., Fuchs, D., Deno, S.Germann, G. (1983). The technical adequacy of a basal reading series mastery test (Research Report No. 113). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota, Institute for Research on Learning Disabilities.
109.
Trimble, A.C. (1970). Can remedial reading be eliminated?Academic Therapy, 5(3), 207–213.
110.
Trippi, J.A. (1973). Special class placement and suggestibility of mentally retarded children. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 78(2), 220–222.
111.
Tucker, J., Stevens, L., Ysseldyke, J. (1983). Learning disabilities: The experts speak out. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 16, 6–14.
112.
Vacc, N.A. (1968). A study of emotionally disturbed children in regular and special classes. Exceptional Children, 35, 197–204.
113.
Vacc, N.A. (1972) Long term effects of special class intervention for emotionally disturbed children. Exceptional Children, 39, 15–22.
114.
Walker, V.S. (1974). The efficacy of the resource room for educating retarded children. Exceptional Children, 40, 288–289.
115.
Wesson, C., Deno, S., Mirkin, P., Sevcik, B., Skiba, R., King, R., Tindal, G., Maruyama, G. (1982). Teaching structure and student achievement effects of curriculum-based measurement: A casual (structural) analysis (Research Report No. 105). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota, Institute for Research on Learning Disabilities. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 227 127).
116.
White, O.R., Haring, N.G. (1980). Exceptional teaching. Columbus, Ohio: Charles E. Merrill.
117.
Wujek, M. (1981). Study of secondary special education program effectiveness. Menlo Park, CA: SRI International. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 219 913).
118.
Ysseldyke, J.E.Thurlow, M.L. (1983). Identification/classification research: An integrative summary of findings (Research Report No. 142). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota, Institute for Research on Learning Disabilities.
119.
Zito, R.J.Bardon, J.J. (1969). Achievement motivation among Negro adolescents in regular and special education programs. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 74, 20–26.
